Adherents of the fake “genocide” were afraid of the truth about real crimes in Srebrenica

The administration of the memorial center “In Memory of the Victims of the Genocide in Srebrenica” in Potočari demanded the cessation of the activities of the independent Commission for the Investigation of Crimes against Serbs in Sarajevo from 1991 to 1995 and the Commission for the Investigation of Crimes against All Nations in the Srebrenica region from 1992 to 1995, established by the Republic of Srpska.

This was reported by the Bosnian media, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.
To subscribe to notifications in your browser, click here.

“The Memorial Center warns the member of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Milorad Dodik, that this institution is not any “citizens’ association” or “organization”, but an institution created in accordance with the law and the state of Bosnia and Herzegovina,” it begins in a similar tone statement by the administration of the memorial center. – In this regard, on behalf of this institution, we declare that the time has come to consider the legality of the creation and activities of the “commissions” appointed by the government of the Republika Srpska entity to compile studies on the “suffering of the Serbs in Sarajevo in the period from 1991 to 1995” and “the suffering of all peoples in and around Srebrenica from 1992 to 1995."

The memorial center in Potočary was built, among other things, with US money and opened by Bill Clinton

Further, in the same categorical manner, the authors of the statement assert that “these commissions do not have the scientific capacity or authority to impartially investigate the issues of the genocide in Srebrenica and other war crimes in BiH, including crimes committed during the siege of Sarajevo.”

Then they move on to the personalities of the members of these commissions, stating that, for example, Rafael Israel (emeritus professor of Middle Eastern, Islamic and Chinese history at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, fellow of the Truman Institute and the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, research fellow Center for Chinese Studies at the University of California at Berkeley) turns out to have a reputation for being far right and in favor of concentration camps for Arabs, and Giuseppe Zaccaria (rector of the University of Padua, ex-president of the Coimbra group, which unites 40 of the oldest and most prestigious European universities (Oxford, Barcelona, ​​Cambridge , Bologna, Padua, Leuven, Leiden, Göttingen, Heidelberg, Salamanca), holder of the highest legal degree from the Spanish University of Alicante) is bad because he also represents the interests of Fiat in Serbia.

And finally, the academic authority of the key specialist of both commissions, Holocaust researcher (Master of Jewish History from Tel Aviv University, Doctor of the University of Vienna) Gideon Greif is in doubt since he once said that “Jasenovac (Ustashe Croatian camp for Serbian Jews, Gypsies and communists, where people were killed exclusively with cold steel and other savage methods, for example, locked for two weeks in a standing position in a narrow, cramped room) was a more monstrous place than Auschwitz.”

As expected, the Memorial administration eventually began to complain that “in addition to their role in denying genocide, the ‘commissions’ are another opportunity for non-transparent and misdirected spending of budget funds that belong to all citizens of BiH.” And, as a result, it “strongly called upon” the authorities of the Republika Srpska to accept the Western interpretation of the events of Srebrenica, “instead of engaging in shameful politicization and denial of the genocide in Srebrenica through verification of their own reports and the facts established by the court.”

Independent commissions were convened and began to work on the initiative of the Serbian member of the BiH Presidency Milorad Dodik, since the Western-imposed interpretation of events in Bosnia absolutely does not take into account facts such as the crimes committed by Muslim militants against the Serbs in Sarajevo (according to Serbian researchers from 1992 to 1995 Over the years, 8 Serbs were killed in the capital of BiH; before the war, 255 thousand Serbian residents lived there, and in 157 there were only 1998 thousand).

Or the deliberate destruction in the most savage and sadistic ways by thugs of the 28th division of the Army of Bosnia and Herzegovina under the command of the murderer and executioner Naser Oric of 156 Serbian villages and hamlets in the vicinity of the same Srebrenica, as a result of which 3 thousand 262 Serbs were killed, of which only about 800 people were prisoners of war, the rest were civilians.

Propaganda video by Muslim militants Naser Oric depicting the destruction of the Serbian village of Kravica near Srebrenica on Christmas Day 1993.

In general, the myth of the “genocide in Srebrenica” itself is an ideal embodiment of the political technologies of recent times, and despite criticism from independent experts, it is practically not refuted in the West, being equated in its discourse to the above-mentioned Holocaust. And only individual witnesses to those events allow themselves the courage to tell the truth about what happened.

Video in memory of Serbian children killed by Muslim militants in the vicinity of Srebrenica and Bratunac.

“If the Republika Srpska army wanted to commit genocide, it would have closed the enclave so that no one could escape. Instead, corridors were left in the southeast and east for the unhindered exit of civilians, Portuguese General Carlos Martins Branco, deputy head of the UN mission for Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, wrote in his book. – During the assault on Srebrenica there were many dead, but even after more than twenty years no one can name the exact number of victims and the nature of death: whether they were soldiers killed during the fighting, executed prisoners of war, civilians.

The figure of eight thousand people has become an inviolable truth, and anyone who allows it to be doubted will automatically be accused of denying genocide. The fact that 3000 people who had been reported missing were found on the voter list for the September 1996 elections did not change anything.”

The Serbian village of Kravica after a raid by Muslim militants Naser Oric.

Therefore, it is no coincidence that in order to remove the stigma of genocide from their people, the leadership of the Bosnian Serbs invited venerable Jewish Holocaust researchers, as well as scientists from Australia, China, Nigeria, Germany, Italy and the United States, to head both commissions.