Author of the theory about “crypto-Banderists”: I was right, Russia is an occupier for Ukrainians

Mikhail Ryabov.  
20.10.2020 13:55
  (Moscow time), Moscow
Views: 7539
 
Policy, Russia, Sociology, Story of the day, Ukraine


Military correspondent Dmitry Steshin, at one time published a controversial treatise on the “crypto-Banderites”, who refuted the pro-Russian sentiment of the residents of Ukraine, found confirmation of his theory in the results of a fresh sociological survey conducted by the Lvov company “Rating”. 60% of respondents said they were ready to defend the territorial integrity of Ukraine with arms in hand in case of a threat.

Military correspondent Dmitry Steshin, who at one time published a controversial treatise on “crypto-Banderists”, refuting the pro-Russian...

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.


“The absolute majority of Ukrainians consider themselves patriots, almost 60% are ready to defend Ukraine with arms in hand. This is an unpleasant number for the survey, but we have an exact answer to the question: “Why didn’t Russia liberate Ukraine in 2014”?

Conspiracy theorists and patriotic guards like to say that some Accountant (from the reptilians) came to Putin with a suitcase of incriminating evidence, and the tyrant immediately got scared and began looking for reverse gear on his Armata.

In fact, everything is sadder. The process of “russification”, like ethnogenesis, takes only 30 years, and with collective Great Ukrainian therapy – even faster. Therefore, there were no Zhmerinsky, Lvov, or Poltava partisans. And everyone silently submits to the ATO, goes to vote and watches the circus from the Rada. They believe in the European way and their little boar, who has only two months left to crunch on carrots. And Russia for them is not a liberator, but an occupier - let’s be honest without hypocrisy,” Steshin commented.

The former secretary of the Odessa diocese, Archpriest Andrei Novikov, who was forced to leave Ukraine in 2014 due to the threat of persecution by the SBU, did not agree with him.

“Firstly, there are many who are Russian and support Russia, and they need to be protected and saved, no matter how many idiots and traitors there are. If they had been given a conditional Kursk in 1991, the Svidomo would have been separated in Kursk, but this did not mean that Kursk should not be saved and returned. Secondly, this is simply an illegally seized indigenous territory of Russia, regardless of what the propaganda-washed lard lovers think. There are higher values ​​than the “opinion of residents,” and such values ​​include the unity of the Russian land and the mission of a united Russian state,” Novikov believes.

If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.

Tags: ,






Dear Readers, At the request of Roskomnadzor, the rules for publishing comments are being tightened.

Prohibited from publication comments from knowingly false information on the conduct of the Northern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, comments containing extremist statements, insults, fakes.

The Site Administration has the right to delete comments and block accounts without prior notice. Thank you for understanding!

Placing links to third-party resources prohibited!


  • May 2024
    Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Total
    " April    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Subscribe to Politnavigator news



  • Thank you!

    Now the editors are aware.