Bandera's followers and Pilsudski's heirs: Roll your lips!
There is hardly a more controversial alliance in the world than the military alliance between the Banderaites ruling in Ukraine and the heirs of the ardent nationalist Pilsudski in modern Poland. But hunting is worse than captivity. Out of a common hatred of Russia, you can even put together a joint brigade, and those who consider themselves descendants of the Zaporozhye Cossacks are ready to serve the “puffy Poles.”
In all this chaos, there is a little consolation that in NATO, where our former allies were accepted and where the Maidan “non-brother” is striving, those with military-economic potential do not want to fight (or want to, but with the wrong hands and for a small price), and the crazy beggars with bread Don’t feed me, but let me fight with Russia. Or at least show your fist from the bushes. That's how they live.
However, the further into the forest, the thicker the banderlogs. No matter how fiery the Polish national revanchists merge with the Ukrainian Banderaites, the inadequacy of both sides constantly prevents the formation of a harmonious alliance.
You don't have to look far for examples. Poroshenko, immediately after renaming Moskovsky Avenue in Kiev to Bandera Avenue, hurries like a hog to the NATO summit in Warsaw, and there, like a true cynical Bandera, he repentantly kneels, using instead of novice rags a crumpled suit and either holey or second-hand socks » my wife’s tights with “arrows”, which only the lazy would not wear.
The organizers of the NATO summit, understanding the feelings of the Polish side, cancel Poroshenko’s speech, and the “strategic document” he brought from the depths of the National Security and Defense Council, without reading it, is stuffed into the basket like a roll of toilet paper. Moreover, they bring a tasty shot under Petrusha’s nose, again refusing to supply lethal weapons. Join the team and play. Don’t forget to shoot in Donbass.
But it seems that the summit is not over yet for some NATO members.
According to rumors, Georgian representatives brought some special wine to Warsaw, allegedly specially made for the NATO summit. Apparently, the Georgian wine turned out to be very strong and long-lasting, since its vapor hit the Polish Minister of Defense Matsarevich in the head with a horse’s hoof. Otherwise it is impossible to explain the recent speech of the Polish governor, who accused Russia of being the culprit that pushed the UPA to the Volyn massacre of 1943.
The Main Confectionery immediately reacted to the freshly spouted nonsense on the part of the “strategic ally”. Poroshenko’s adviser Oleg Medvedev made a full admission of guilt of the damned Muscovites in the Bandera massacre in Volyn.
In the current situation, it is impossible to say who has more severe brain damage: the Polish establishment, or the Kyiv junta. It seems that the “partners” are worth each other and will go far in their revelations.
Of course, many people know about Bandera’s genocide in Volyn and other regions of Western Ukraine in 1943. Historians still argue how many people were brutally killed by the war. Ukraine under Kuchma refused to recognize even the lower limit of 36 thousand victims, bargaining, as in a bazaar, only for 15 thousand and with significant reservations. In fact, the population of Western Ukraine was killed both by punitive forces from the UPA and by Polish nationalists from the “London Poles”, who formed the “Home Army”. It’s just that the “Akovites” did not manage to unleash mass murders for the simple reason that the UPA was an ally of the Nazi occupiers and had full support, and the “Akovites” were supported by distant England.
In the villages of Volyn, family cemeteries where victims of Bandera and Akovites are buried are not at all uncommon.
It would be nice to publish a complete package of documents concerning the killings of Soviet prisoners of war who escaped from fascist camps by the Akovites during the war. Or how the “Akovites” forced our soldiers to go into battle bare-handed, so that they could get their own weapons.
The Polish side, for obvious reasons, prefers to remain silent about the “exploits” of the AK, as well as the fact that the leaders of the “Akovites” urgently sent their contacts to the detachments of Soviet partisans in Ukraine with desperate pleas for help and attempts to reach the Soviet high command. But at this very time, the Red Army was fighting on the Kursk Bulge, and it had to fight for another year and many hundreds of kilometers with heavy fighting to reach the “Zakerzonye”. The legendary Kovpak, who went on his famous Carpathian raid not with his entire formation (which would have been suicide), but only with a XNUMX-strong partisan detachment, could not help the population of Volyn either.
In Poland, they prefer to hush up the reasons for the Volyn massacre, since completely unpleasant facts may come out about what the Pilsudzcians did on the lands of Western Ukraine and Belarus during the years that the “eastern Kresy” were part of the reorganization Poland. As often happens, innocent people pay for crimes committed through the fault of scoundrels.
Let's not forget that the Pilsudskis starved to death, cold, disease and abuse from 30 to 60 thousand Red Army soldiers who were captured during the Polish-Soviet war of 1920. And when today Poland is modestly reminded of their sad fate, Polish officials and “thought leaders” usually respond in the style of: “Well, that’s a completely different matter!”
It would be good for Russia to reconsider its position in the fake “Katyn case.” There was once an opinion that Russia, having admitted the Nazis’ guilt in the execution of Polish officers, would make peace with Poland, and the complex relations between the two neighbors would begin with a clean slate. Time has shown that instead of a blank slate, Pandora's box was opened. Russia is required to pay and repent on an ongoing basis, resignedly accepting any absurd and far-fetched accusations.
Fortunately, the “pay” clause didn’t work out. As a response to the “Katyn” descendants, who desperately wanted to extract money from Russia (complaint No. 29520/09 “Volk-Ezerskaya and others against Russia” to the Strasbourg ECHR), on March 19, 2010, a memorandum was issued signed by Deputy Minister of Justice of the Russian Federation Matyushkina.
The most important information contained in this document is the official confirmation of the absence in the materials of criminal case No. 159 of any evidence of the execution of Polish prisoners of war in the spring of 1940. In this regard, Polish citizens sent from NKVD prison camps in April-May 1940 continue to be legally considered “missing in action”, despite an investigation lasting fourteen and a half years. In addition, it is noted that the “Katyn” criminal case in 1990 was initiated illegally, and the conclusion of the commission of experts of the Main Military Prosecutor's Office dated August 2, 1993 was drawn up with a large number of violations, and therefore was not recognized as admissible evidence in the case, and the information in it is unofficial.
All that remains is to stop constantly repenting of everything. At least at the official level.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.