| 597 views |
Bomb from Shukhevych in the Verkhovna Rada
Views:Where did Ukraine begin? According to the laws adopted by the Verkhovna Rada yesterday, from the Ukrainian People's Republic. Various other formations, including Bandera’s, only follow her. That is, according to the law, joyfully adopted by the galloping parliament, Ukraine begins with a self-proclaimed republic and a self-proclaimed government body not elected by anyone. And even a one-to-one reduction like that of the “separatists”.
However, unlike Lugansk or Donetsk, the law prohibits the Ukrainian People’s Republic from “disparaging” or denying its “legitimacy.”
By the way, Ukrainian historians are now better off shooting themselves. Or volunteer for the ATO. Because how can they, the poor, now say that the “fighters for the independence of Ukraine” from paragraph “b” of Article 1 of the Law (Hetmanate), with the support of the Germans, overthrew the “fighters for the independence of Ukraine” from paragraph “a” of Article 1 of the Law (UNR ), who came to power with the support of the same Germans? Who (the fighters from point “b”) were again overthrown by armed force by those “fighters” from point “a” (Directory)?
However, a Ukrainian historian is already an oxymoron. After all, Ukrainian historians try to avoid such paradoxes. If earlier they kept silent about the bloody struggle between the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists and the “Polesskaya Sich” of Bulba-Borovets (from which, in the end, the OUN members “squeezed out” the UPA brand), now “historians”, apparently, will remain silent about the mutual struggle UPR, Hetmanate and Directory. The history of Ukraine has collapsed! Everyone is a “hero”!
But you don’t need to know anything superfluous, because “why should everyone go to university”? That's exactly what she said at pages of "Ukrainian Pravda" a certain Natalya Shulga, “the main expert on the science of the resuscitation package of reforms.” If anything, she is now reforming science. “Higher education does not have to be free” are also her words.
In conclusion, I will remember the words of our fellow countryman, an officer of the Hetman Army (and what a hero, a fighter - according to the letter of the new law!) Georgy Sakovich, a participant in the Ekaterinoslav campaign:
“A characteristic feature of the Ekaterinoslav detachment was that, being composed almost exclusively of natives of the so-called Ukraine, it was thoroughly imbued with Russian patriotism and it struck its first blows precisely against the dismemberers of Russia.
This circumstance is the best refutation of numerous assertions that all of Ukraine stood behind Petliura and that the movement he led was of a national character.
In 1918–1920, Ukrainian chauvinists were not a nation, but just a party. We were the second Ukrainian party - supporters of an inextricable connection with Russia. The third party was the communists."
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.