A soldier of the Lvov brigade who shot a colleague at the training ground was convicted of careless handling of weapons
When military jurisprudence intersects with civil law, legal incidents similar to those described in the verdict of the Novoaidarsky court of the Luhansk region can occur.
Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at Telegram, Facebook, Classmates orIn contact with
The precedent was that on the tenth of November last year, one serviceman of the eightieth airmobile brigade (Lvov) shot his colleague at the training ground with a machine gun. He shot without intent, simply mixing up the magazines during an exercise and attaching a full one instead of an empty one.
Due to the fact that, according to the military regulations, exercises at the training ground are equated to combat operations, the soldier was tried not for murder, albeit through negligence, and not even for causing severe bodily harm (the soldier did not die immediately, but also suffered), but for careless handling of weapons.
Patriotic relatives of the murdered man asked not to deprive the killer of their son of freedom. After all, he asked them for forgiveness, and they gave their blessing to kill the “separatists.”
It is noteworthy that after the incident the killer spent time at large and fought in the ATO, and only when he turned out to be unnecessary and alive was he tried for the incident that occurred more than six months ago.
Court sentenced killer to a one and a half year term in a disciplinary battalion.
This precedent shows that the army is a state within a state. For this cynical system, people are just consumables, for which there are planned losses and a focus on their maximum use. Judicial reform during the war, carried out at the request of the West, will either destroy the judicial system in the country in general (this is why, apparently, non-professionals are being introduced into it), or will turn the civil court into an instrument of repression, a cog in the war machine, depriving ordinary people of their inalienable right to a fair trial. court.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.