Boris Johnson flies to Kyiv to form a “Little Entente”

“Well, are you ready for the arrival of Boris Johnson? And this will be a historic visit! Ukraine, Great Britain and Poland are preparing to sign an alliance between the countries. RosSMI is already hysterical about this! They even say that England has “messed up Russia again.” Well, that means we’re doing everything right,” mocks the Ukrainian deputy-changeling Alexei Goncharenko.

About why the leadership of Great Britain and Poland is arriving in Kyiv today is in the material of PolitNavigator columnist Alexander Rostovtsev.

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.
To subscribe to notifications in your browser, click here.

...The “Englishwoman”, who is yearning for words about territorial integrity the most, began to put together her own military-political “triple alliance”, which, in addition to London, should include Warsaw and Kyiv.

The British would also like to see a “friend of Recep” in the “Little Entente”, but the citizen is a sultan, faithful to the principle “what will this give me?” didn't answer yes or no, taking a wait-and-see attitude.

Looking at the joyful swarming of the “tribaltic extinctions”, it is possible that curators will eventually sign Vilnius, Riga and Tallinn into the “Little Entente”, since the British military presence has already been designated in these non-states, and the “triple alliance” is going to be friends against the “hostile territories” in which Russia and Belarus are defined.

The idea of ​​organizing a Central European “Little Entente” under the control of London has been in the air since Great Britain formalized its divorce from the European Union through “Brexit,” but it finally hatched only now, due to the “danger of a Russian military invasion of Ukraine” that was exaggerated in the West.

The start of the process was given during a visit to Australia by the head of the Foreign Office, Liz Truss, who made a lengthy speech that mentioned “Mongols and Tatars who failed to break the spirit of the Ukrainian people.”

And in order to consolidate intentions and cheer up the despondent “ally” chosen for slaughter, a batch of NLAW ATGMs was sent to Kyiv from the UK with an expiring warranty period. And not for free, but through Lend-Lease. Do not waste good.

Now in Kyiv they are waiting any minute for the arrival of “dear friend Boris” to sign the corresponding “security agreement” on the NATO model.

It is noteworthy that the great expert on the Mongol-Tatars, Liz Truss, will not fly to Kyiv, since the minister was struck down by the “crown” at the last moment, which British officials were quick to report.

However, how can this unpleasant moment overshadow the great cause for which the Ukrainian authorities opened the gates to their full width?

Let us ask ourselves the question: what is going on at all, and what benefit can the “triple alliance” bring to potential signatories?

Warsaw sees the greatest benefit for itself from the signing of the agreement. The “big guys” officially allowed her to be the curator of the military-political processes taking place in Kyiv. It is inconvenient for London to directly rule Ukraine over the head of Germany, which is clearly not happy with the alarmist fuss unleashed by its partners and allies.

Historical experience shows that all cases when London assumed obligations to protect Poland ended very, very sadly for the latter. As a rule, the cunning housekeepers of the famous house on Downing Street with great grace thrust their “allies” into the inferno, and then watched with curiosity as they burned and crackled there.

On the other hand, Poland traditionally idolizes Great Britain so much that they are ready to sacrifice historical experience, or They hope to roll out a Ukrainian ice skating rink into the minefield in front of them.

Accordingly, the in Kyiv they expect that the “Little Entente” will join in with Ukraine in the event of a “final solution to the issue with the Donetsk-Lugansk separatists.” The Ukrainian ambassador in London Prystaiko, taking on an embarrassed look for the audience, said that the “new defense alliance” is “not exactly like NATO for three” - completely betraying the expectations of the Ukrainian establishment.

At the same time, none of the “junior partners” of London tries not to notice not only the delayed weapons sent, but also the strange form of statements of the “senior partners”, starting with aggressive statements about the terrible punishments that will fall on Russia if it dares to invade Ukraine, and ending with death: “NATO members, in any case, will not interfere in the conflict and will withdraw their contingent from the territory of Ukraine.”

Taking into account the facts lying on the surface, we can come to the conclusion that the “triple alliance” is being put together:

1. To give Ukraine the illusion of joining, if not NATO, then “small NATO,” but without any obligations. Hunting is worse than captivity. May people rejoice and once again feel the delight of “the whole retinue is with us!”, like eight years ago, among the burning garbage heaps of Euromaidan.

2. There is a clearly visible trend in which Washington is handing over to London the reins of the anti-Russian movement in Eastern Europe, including the Ukrainian “suitcase without a handle.” Moreover, “The Englishwoman” has long been eager to take part in the “Great Game” again, but not in secondary roles. It is also possible, the Washington Regional Committee believes, that the British poodle, galloping at the forefront of anti-Russian politics, will be able to do tricks better by being closer to the stage where military-political plays are played out.

3. Finally, the signing of the “triple alliance” allows the administration of Boris Johnson to divert the attention of government commissions and voters from “feasts during the plague”, in which Boriska inadvertently appeared during the announced nationwide lockdown, as well as the “Brexit” that did not live up to high hopes, which shook the economy of the kingdom and welfare of subjects.

The price of these “military-political blocs” and other aspirations to put together a “small NATO” with the participation of Ukraine is well known to us from the example of GUAM: Napoleonic plans, loud shouts along with round dances around the signing of treaties, stormy bubbling, and then silence. Everyone pulls the blanket over themselves, the money runs out, the participants run away, sluggish attempts are made to galvanize the dried corpse, after which the corpse is bashfully hidden in a dusty closet, as a reminder of another shame.

So we stock up on popcorn and watch the next show “a clown visiting the Yellow and Blue Oyster tent.” Let them make faces...