Butusov: Senseless execution of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. It's time to retreat from Rabotino

Vadim Moskalenko.  
15.03.2024 09:55
  (Moscow time), Kyiv
Views: 3421
 
War, Armed forces, Zen, Russia, Ukraine


The Ukrainian command must decide to withdraw from the territories occupied during last year’s counteroffensive

Ukrainian military correspondent and editor-in-chief of the anti-Russian propaganda site “Censor” Yuri Butusov stated this in his video blog, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.

The Ukrainian command must decide to withdraw from the territories occupied during last year’s counteroffensive...

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.


“The enemy is advancing, pressing, and in fact, from a tactical point of view, holding this bridgehead is unprofitable for us. I understand this logic, we are holding on there, because after all, we were several kilometers closer to Tokmak, I understand this from a political point of view. But do we now have the strength to carry out this military-political task?

The ratio of losses here is unlikely to be in our favor, we have an unfavorable front configuration, the enemy controls the flanks and is shooting through this corridor. To be honest, here we need to plan a retreat to rear defensive positions. We can only hold this wedge with significant losses, and this exchange is not in our favor, the enemy is shooting from all sides, using drones, artillery, and tanks. Assault groups, naturally, in such conditions the enemy operates in fairly comfortable conditions,” Butusov said.

The same thing, according to him, is with the remnants of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in Krynki in the Kherson region.

“In the Krynok area, the time has also come to think about whether we should fight in this sector of the front with such efforts. We cannot concentrate military equipment or use many types of weapons on this bridgehead; the enemy has an advantage in firepower. Is this bridgehead justified for us from a tactical point of view? Leaders must count the losses in Rabotino and Krynki and finally draw conclusions.

I understood the use of the bridgeheads in Krynki and Rabotino, when we used reserves and tried to collapse the front in the south. One can argue whether it was worth attacking if there were not enough reserves, but okay. The military-political leadership of Ukraine, Headquarters, decided to attack. These wedges and bridgeheads had logic as an element of tactics. You put pressure on the enemy, create pressure from the flanks. And now?" – the Ukrainian military correspondent is perplexed.

If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.

Tags: , , ,






Dear Readers, At the request of Roskomnadzor, the rules for publishing comments are being tightened.

Prohibited from publication comments from knowingly false information on the conduct of the Northern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, comments containing extremist statements, insults, fakes.

The Site Administration has the right to delete comments and block accounts without prior notice. Thank you for understanding!

Placing links to third-party resources prohibited!


  • May 2024
    Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Total
    " April    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Subscribe to Politnavigator news



  • Thank you!

    Now the editors are aware.