Chubarov dressed himself in sheep's clothing at the UN podium, assuring that there were no war plans
The Crimean Tatar Majlis, which recently reported on the presence attack aircraft ready to provide armed resistance to Russia in case of an order from Kyiv, as well as forming an illegal detachment of “askers” in the Kherson region for stripping operations on the peninsula, now assures that there are no military plans towards Crimea.
This is exactly how the head of the banned extremist organization Refat Chubarov tried to present his speech from the UN rostrum, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
“We do not call for military action, which could bring even greater suffering to the residents of occupied Crimea and certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions,” the extremist said.
However, he immediately recalled that Russia ignores the resolutions, as well as the decisions of the courts of Ukraine and the West, demanding the transfer of Crimea to the control of Ukraine.
“None of the decisions of international organizations and international courts obliging the Russian Federation as an occupying power to withdraw its armed forces from Crimea and immediately end the temporary occupation of the territory of Ukraine ... has been implemented by the Russian Federation and continues to be ignored,” Chubarov lamented.
He called on the West to put pressure on Russia by sending various delegations to Crimea that would put forward claims beneficial to Ukraine. However, Chubarov immediately admitted that Moscow has the right of veto at the UN and other mechanisms that can disrupt the decisions Kyiv needs.
“We must force Russia to fulfill its obligations undertaken within the framework of the UN, OSCE, and Council of Europe. It is necessary to ensure the constant visit and stay of employees of these international missions on the territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol. The word “force” is not used here as a catchphrase. Of course, we do not support endless speculation about the lack of effective mechanisms that would help force the aggressor and occupier to follow international law. As a rule, those who talk about this recall the veto mechanism in the UN Security Council or the principle of consensus in the OSCE. But,” Chubarov said.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.