The actions of the judicial authorities of the Russian Federation in the case of Dzhemilev Jr. are impeccable, - lawyer “Sevastopol-Crimea-Russia”
The actions of the Russian judicial authorities in the case of Khaiser Dzhemilev, who killed Fevzi Edemov in Bakhchisarai in 2013, are impeccable.”
Subscribe to the news "PolitNavigator - Crimea" in Facebook, Classmates or In contact with
Crimean lawyer Ivan Bakai told PolitNavigator about this, analyzing yesterday’s statements by the Ukrainian media.
Let us recall that it was reported, in particular, that the Krasnodar court refused to dismiss the case of Dzhemilev, accused of premeditated murder, in connection with the existing verdict of the Ukrainian court.
“The Krasnodar court “forgot” about Art. 12 part 3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and refused to drop the case, despite the verdict of the Ukrainian court. Dzhemilev remains hostage,” the defendant’s defense lawyer wrote on Twitter.
“However,” Bakai noted, “the Federal Law “On the application of the provisions of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation in the territories of the Republic of Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol” determined that if the trial in a criminal case began before March 18, 2014, it continues in the manner established by the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, in the absence of grounds for returning the criminal case to the prosecutor. Thus, the trial of this case by a Ukrainian court “in person” is illegal. And the materials of the case were “taken from the air” - after all, all the protocols of investigative actions and material evidence are at the disposal of the competent authorities of the Russian Federation.”
At the time of the annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol to the Russian Federation, the lawyer recalled, there were 1 criminal and about 400 civil cases in the courts, in which prosecutors were involved.
“However, apart from the case of Hayser Dzhemilev, no other case aroused the interest of the Ukrainian Themis. This is the best evidence of the fabrication of materials in this case for political reasons. And precisely on the part of the Kyiv authorities,” concluded Ivan Bakai.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.