State Duma Deputy: A successful blitzkrieg in Ukraine could have ended in disaster for Russia
The strategic meaning of the Northern Military District lies, among other things, in a deep transformation and radically painful improvement of not only Ukrainian, but also Russian society.
Deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, economist Mikhail Delyagin stated this on the air of Aurora radio, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
“Blitzkrieg can be carried out by Russia with a management system corresponding at least to the industrial era. If this Russia existed, it would be able to cope with tasks more complex than blitzkrieg - such as ensuring at least minimal pacification of Ukrainian territory and the inclusion of social engineering technology there in a reasonable direction.
But since our control system is incapable of this, as far as can be judged, it has retreated in fear from the simpler task of blitzkrieg, realizing that success in solving this task will lead to an even more complex task, which it will certainly not even be able to comprehend.
Restructuring is underway, the grinding, excuse me, is of a mutual nature, albeit with different intensity. And to say that only Ukrainians are dying, in my opinion, is indecent.
But the strategic meaning of the North Military District lies in the deep transformation and radical improvement of not only Ukrainian, but also Russian society. If anyone thinks that this recovery will be painful only for Ukrainian society, they are very mistaken,” Delyagin explained.
“Accordingly, if and when everything ended quickly, then there would simply be no reason for such metamorphoses? Everyone would exclaim - oh, what a great fellow we are, and we move on with our lives,” – the radio host clarified.
“Yes, like after 2008, like after Crimea - everything is fine, beautiful Marquise, and then the situation would be fraught with disaster. To a greater or lesser extent than now is an open question,” the deputy agreed.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.