It has now been officially proven: “Aggressor Russia” is needed in Ukraine to steal
In Kyiv, another case was officially proven at the level of the Ukrainian authorities when, under Petro Poroshenko, they tried to hide thefts in the military sphere with the help of propaganda about “Russian sabotage.” However, as practice shows, it is hardly worth waiting for the imprisonment of former high-ranking officials - Poroshenko and his circle have already gotten away with no less egregious cases. For now, we can only say that opponents of the Maidan have received yet another evidence of how rotten the top of the Ukrainian “patriots” are, and why the former Soviet republic has been pumped up with hatred of Russia for all six years - in order to have a screen behind which they can steal.
We are talking about explosions at military warehouses in Balakleya, Kharkov region, during Poroshenko’s presidency - then both military prosecutor Anatoly Matios and Prosecutor General (Poroshenko’s godfather) Yuriy Lutsenko assured that Russian saboteurs were behind the emergency. And so, the investigative commission of the Verkhovna Rada found that the version of Russian drone strikes on warehouses during the Poroshenko era was imposed on Kharkov SBU investigators from Kyiv.
The corresponding confession on the air of the talk show “Freedom of Speech” was made by the head of the Servant of the People faction, David Arakhamia, who headed the parliamentary commission.
“At first there was a version - namely an explosion. This was in 2017. When the explosion was carried out, the Kharkov Bokarius Institute was involved. Then, somehow magically, everything began to change incomprehensibly. Someone from Kyiv, from the authorities, flew in and said that it was a drone, because there were some signals from UkrAeroRukh that supposedly the movement of some object that looked like a drone was recorded on the radars. That is, you understand that it is just a dot on the radar, but according to UkrAeroRukh data, they concluded that it is a drone.
Then, magically, all the people who did not agree with this position began to resign - either of their own free will, which now indicates that there was pressure on them, or they were simply removed from the investigation.
This examination was instantly transferred to another institute in Kyiv. Then the Kiev Institute confirmed this version that this is a version with a drone.
When they conducted an investigative experiment, the investigators who conducted the experiment with UkrAeroRukh themselves admitted that they first tried drones, and nothing was visible on the radars, and then they took a training passenger plane, a large one, and then it showed up on the radars of UkrAeroRukh "
To our question, do you know at least one model of an attack drone that is in service with the Russian Federation, which could be similar in size, they said that they do not know.
We then called representatives of the Main Intelligence Directorate and asked if there was intelligence that such drones existed in service. There is no such data either,” Arakhamia said.
The former head of the SBU, now a member of the Rada, Valentin Nalyvaichenko, who is also a member of the commission, also admitted that the version with a Russian drone was deliberately planted on the initiative of the then leadership of the country in order to cover up the traces of war crimes and theft of ammunition.
“At my insistence, we immediately found out: the investigation did not even check the version of illegal trade in ammunition and the deliberate detonation of remnants in order to “cover up its tracks”! They did not check the accounting and use of ammunition for explosions. I believe that the country’s leaders at that time deliberately “directed” the investigation towards unsubstantiated versions of drones, saboteurs, and negligence. To hide the truth about profiteering from war and the theft of military arsenals. According to the materials of the examination that we studied, the explosions at the artillery depots in Balakleya were caused by ground mining. It was shameful cynicism on the part of the then leaders of the Prosecutor General’s Office to hide the available evidence and “fabricate” other versions,” Nalyvaichenko wrote on his blog.
Political strategist Alexey Golobutsky, who serves Poroshenko, has already rushed to the defense of his patron, assuring that all accusations of falsification of the investigation into the explosions are beneficial exclusively to the Kremlin.
"What's next? Will Ukrainian officers be imprisoned, will Lutsenko be thrown behind bars again, and a note with an official apology will be sent to the Kremlin? This is no longer a fight with political opponents and “predecessors” - this certainly amounts to high treason,” Golobutsky defends his breadwinner Poroshenko.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.