Dear transmission! This Wednesday, almost crying, the entire Kanatchikova dacha gathered at the microphones...
The right-wing grant-suckers of the country of the victorious Sparrow-Banderism continue to look for specks in the eyes of others, pointedly not noticing the blockage of logs in their own eyes.
On March 28, parasites and parasites from the so-called “Crimean human rights activists” once again gathered at the Ukrinform press center to share their creaky opinions on the work of the media in the Russian Crimea.
All as one, with loud burps: Tatyana Pechonchik – head of the board of the Center for Information on Human Rights; Irina Sedova – “expert” of the Crimean Human Rights Group; Alexander Burmagin – executive director of the Human Rights Platform, member of the Independent Media Council; Vyacheslav Likhachev is the coordinator of the direction of documenting human rights violations of the Vostok-SOS charitable foundation.
All this grant-eating army, instead of moving sacks or clearing sheds of rubbish, acts as co-authors of the report. And only fellow worker Likhachev was invited as a reviewer. Warm company - all our own.
The name of the meeting alone indicated that there could be no talk of any unbiased view. The parasites set the agenda of their interpreter on the topic “Hate speech in the information space of Crimea: scale and consequences.”
“Hate speech” was searched for by paid human rights activists in three areas: Crimean media working in the legal framework of the Russian Federation; unofficial electronic media of Crimea; federal Russian TV channels. The period of time from 2014 to 2017 was studied. For comparison, releases of key Russian media in the Crimean information space in the spring of 2014 and spring of 2017 were used.
With particular passion, the “experts” looked for sources of information that spoke more offensively than others about the Vorobandera regime and their henchmen in Crimea.
The “researchers” also identified the most “oppressed” groups based on religious, ethnic and social characteristics. The “experts” from the high road put the results of their mouse fuss in the form of recommendations, which they intend to bring to the attention of the Ukrainian government, the “world power” and even the power structures of the Russian Federation.
In general, “Dear program! On Saturday, almost crying, the entire Kanatchikova dacha gathered in front of the screens...”
And Svidomo’s right-wing madhouse did not disappoint! Immediately after Pechonchik’s introductory muttering, a curly montage of Russian TV programs from the spring of 2014 was shown with typical (according to the assembled assholes) broadcasts in “hate speech” on the Crimean air.
Thus, the “Russia 24” story was recorded in this category, in which Crimeans lay flowers and light candles as a sign of grief for the victims of the “Odessa Khatyn”, and the speaker of the State Council of Crimea, Konstantinov, says on camera: “I never thought that I would live to see this... " And further: “The enemy is not defeated, there can be only one conversation with Nazism - this is its destruction.”
So what is Konstantinov wrong about? Should the Ukrainian Nazis, who had already killed hundreds of people at that time, have to be patted on the head and given food coupons? All this scum who laughed at the “fried Colorados”? Only an aspen stake in the chest plywood!
Immediately after these shots, a story was presented from Mariupol on “Bloody Sunday” on May 9, 2014. Presenter of TV channel “Russia” Evgeniy Popov: “Kyiv punitive forces drowned the main national holiday in blood. After Odessa, the rebellious Mariupol will be humiliated on Victory Day..."/
Again, what's wrong? Raguli did not organize the massacre in Mariupol on May 9, 2014? They didn’t shoot at unarmed people and crush them with armored vehicles? Who could flood Mariupol with blood on Victory Day? Only the Nazis. I understand, it’s a shame when someone appreciates you so much, although you consider yourself the heir to a thousand-year-old Cossack democracy, which taught Europe how to pick its nose correctly and gave America a model constitution. In general, the owner of the crooked face blames the mirror.
Zhirinovsky also got it for his characterization of the clique Farion: “If there had been no uterine rabies, there would have been no Maidan.” It’s extremely difficult to argue with Beowulfovich on this point. It’s a pity that the authors of the selection didn’t squeeze Farion’s selected speeches into their video libel. Compared to her, the rude Zhirik would definitely look like the standard gentleman from the House of Weights and Measures.
The clip ended with the gloomy maxim of Mikhail Leontyev from “However”: “This is a good chance to deal with our fifth column.”
It is noteworthy that in the “hate speech” compilation, no one called for hanging, shooting, or otherwise repressing the Ukrainian people. Rightly so, only the Ukronatsiks and related maydauns were cursed and crushed. In general, it is clear that Poroshenko’s grant-suckers have taken to justifying and defending the rot.
At the end of the presentation, the presenter of the press, Pechonchik, winced quite a bit, saying that all these words were spoken to “Ukrainian activists, journalists, human rights activists who criticize the processes taking place in modern Russia.”
It’s a pity that Pechonchik and her accomplices did not experience the universal methods of influencing cheaters. In polite society they were beaten on their insolent faces with heavy bronze candelabra, and in the Wild West they were lynched without delay.
So who do the assembled “experts” consider to be the target audience for the “hate speech” of the Crimean and federal media? The list is standardly predictable - these are Crimean Tatars, Ukrainians, Mejlisoids, “Euromaidan activists”, Muslims, migrants, women (is this the fascist Farionikha a woman?), Filaret members and even (oh horror!) LGBT people. Of the eight positions, three hits (“Majlis”, maydauns, Filaret’s sect), the rest - a finger in the dupa. Add more Martians.
Pechonchik knocked out a stingy male tear, powerfully shuddering once again, transferring the terms “Bandera”, “Banderlog”, “militants” to all Ukrainians. Khabalka used similar projections for other categories of “offended”. Separately, it was surprising that the term “Uniates” in relation to Greek Catholics was also classified by “researchers” as “hate speech.”
She pushed it powerfully, inspire! It reminded me of an old joke when a not very polite man demanded from a well-fed lady who occupied a double seat in public transport with the words: “move over, you elephant!”, which the lady extrapolated into “comrades, he called me a bitch!”
“He spoke, wringing his hands, a talker and a troublemaker.” Further, the specially invited young man Bumargin played the role of a learned monkey, addressing those present with a speech on how to correctly understand the term “mova vorozhnechi”. Referring to European human rights institutions, Bumargin chewed on the snot for a long time and tediously, “tse oburennya ta rozpalennya hate,” repeating in his own way parts of Pechonik’s speech.
After the boring Bumargin, human rights advocate Sedova came out with her two cents, assessing the situation with the media in Crimea with the formula “when we started the study, we thought that everything was terrible there, but in fact it’s even worse there than we imagined,” calling the report “ toxic."
In this case, it is difficult to argue with Sedova, since their expert “second-fresh sturgeon” can only be approached from the windward side. Rectal literature. A manuscript that doesn't sink.
According to Sedova’s authoritative opinion, the Russian TV channels “First”, “Russia-1” and “NTV” often use “Vorozhnechi language” in their broadcasts, when they should have refrained from making value judgments.
Of course, Sedova’s opinion is invaluable for Russian journalism.
I believe the above is enough to get an idea of the coven organized by Svidomo sewers from “human rights”. A deceitful and corrupt bastard, on whom there is no place to put a stamp.
Summing up.
The phantasmagoria that reigned at the press conference of the “human rights” servants of the Vorobander regime appeared. in fact. invention of the bicycle. Having snatched the convenient term “hate speech” from European caches, a group of stubborn people is trying to pull their holey rubber band onto the globe in such a way that Russia will have to answer for harsh phrases addressed to the sadists, murderers and looters released by Euromaidan. The chances are zero, but the grants must be earned.
In general, “dear editor, maybe it’s better about the reactor, about your favorite lunar tractor...”? However, continue to make it funny for us.
Yes, and you can also add this text to your list of “hate speech”.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.