Dugin: Putin must respond to the Kremlin’s attack, otherwise it’s capitulation
The absence of retaliatory steps to the drone attack on the Kremlin will mean virtual capitulation.
Philosopher and political scientist Alexander Dugin stated this on the YouTube channel Tsargrad TV, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
“I think this is a direct blow to the president, this is a demonstration of the vulnerability of our air defense, this is actually such a fundamental declaration of war on us, which we wanted to avoid, not notice, reduce the whole problem to a private special military operation. That’s why it’s called a “special operation,” as something separate,” Dugin explained.
– It is natural to respond to the West’s attack on the Russian capital, on the Russian president, because Ukraine is not here as a subject. It was the consolidated West and NATO countries that struck a blow against the President of the Russian Federation and the Kremlin. This is how it should be assessed.
What response should follow?
I think that this is up to our supreme commander in chief to decide. From my point of view, not to notice and not to respond would be an unequivocal capitulation, simply an admission that the enemy has the right to attack a nuclear power in the very center and carry out direct attacks on our president.
This will mean surrender.
If not capitulation, then the range and range of possible answers depends entirely on our leadership, and if there is an answer, it will be reasonable, correct, and whatever it is, it is not within my competence to judge.
But the fact that the West declared war on us and simply carried out an attack on our president, on the Kremlin, on the country, on Moscow, then not recognizing this simply means capitulating, throwing out a white flag.”
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.