Experts have suggested why “decision-making centers” have not yet been destroyed by Russian missiles
Yesterday’s attacks on military infrastructure facilities in Kyiv and other regions of Ukraine were not carried out out of any kind of revenge, as Ukrainian propaganda is trying to present. The Russian Armed Forces destroyed objects that posed a danger as part of a special operation.
Military expert Alexander Khramchikhin told PolitNavigator about this.
“This has nothing to do with revenge. There is a war going on, and the strikes on targets in Ukraine are connected with the war, nothing else. At the same time, Ukrainian propaganda stated that Russia allegedly ran out of missiles - well, that’s propaganda. They talk about it because they want to,” he noted.
The editor-in-chief of the National Defense magazine, Igor Korotchenko, emphasized that Russian missiles in Kyiv are not hitting the building of the Ministry of Defense or the SBU. Over time, their destruction is obvious, but there is no political solution for this yet:
“The Russian military command sets tasks to defeat priority military targets in Ukraine, including those located on the territory of its capital. Therefore, all the military and military-technical infrastructure of Ukraine that poses a threat to us and whose activities are dangerous for us are being attacked. They are destroyed in accordance with specified parameters and a certain priority for selecting appropriate targets. In this case, these are objects on the territory of Kyiv.
Unfortunately, these are not decision-making centers yet, but, nevertheless, other military objects are identified and destroyed. Why not decision-making centers? This means that the high command has some considerations for which they are postponing the corresponding decision for now. This is in the logic of people who have all the information. From a military point of view, the destruction of decision-making centers in Kyiv is obvious, but this means that the time has not yet come, in the opinion of our political leadership. We hope he will come again,” he concluded.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.