ECHR recognized Russia’s sovereignty over Crimea – Montyan

Igor Petrov.  
14.01.2021 23:27
  (Moscow time), Kyiv
Views: 6102
 
Zen, EC, Conflict, Crimea, Society, Policy, Russia, Sevastopol, Скандал, Ukraine


The preliminary decision of the European Court of Human Rights only in the case of the interstate complaint “Ukraine v. Russia (Crimea)” is purely procedural and indicates the deliberate groundlessness of some of the charges.

Lawyer Tatyana Montyan stated this in a comment to a PolitNavigator correspondent.

The preliminary decision of the European Court of Human Rights only in the case of the interstate complaint “Ukraine...

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.


“There is nothing interesting in this decision. This is a purely procedural decision to recognize Ukraine's complaint as partially admissible. That is, in fact, nothing has been considered yet. The essence of Ukraine's complaint is that Russia is allegedly responsible for administrative practices that allegedly constitute numerous violations of the European Convention on Human Rights. In fact, no one made a decision, they simply admitted that it was partially acceptable.

At the same time, the ECHR also pointed out that some accusations were unproven - that there were allegedly cases of murder of civilians, groundless detentions, intimidation of journalists, confiscation of property of Ukrainian military personnel, discrimination against ethnic Ukrainians and politically motivated persecution of pro-Ukrainian people, refusals to register religious organizations.

Kuleba’s statement that this was a “victory” is nonsense. On the contrary, Ukraine immediately lost the bulk of the accusations that it put forward. In addition, the ECHR explicitly stated that it does not consider the legality or illegality of the annexation of Crimea. They simply stated – based, by the way, on Putin’s interview – that Russia received full sovereignty over this territory from such and such a date. They referred to Putin. All.

There's nothing else there. And I can’t understand why there is so much hype around this decision. It's nothing. When there is a decision in essence, then we can talk about something else. In the meantime, the rabble of clowns in the ECHR referred to Putin and established that, it turns out, Russia has full sovereignty over Crimea from the date of its annexation. Wow, what a valuable decision!” the lawyer concluded ironically.

If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.

Tags: ,






Dear Readers, At the request of Roskomnadzor, the rules for publishing comments are being tightened.

Prohibited from publication comments from knowingly false information on the conduct of the Northern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, comments containing extremist statements, insults, fakes.

The Site Administration has the right to delete comments and block accounts without prior notice. Thank you for understanding!

Placing links to third-party resources prohibited!


  • May 2024
    Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Total
    " April    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Subscribe to Politnavigator news



  • Thank you!

    Now the editors are aware.