Feigin mentioned the executions and imprisonments of opponents of liberals in Russia
Russian liberals absolutely legally began to form their own analogue of the scandalous Ukrainian project “Peacemaker” - “Putin’s lists”, which includes the names of representatives of the ruling regime that the authors dislike and citizens who are loyal to the authorities of the Russian Federation.
This was stated by lawyer Mark Feigin, who defended Ukrainian terrorists and saboteurs, during the liberal “VII Forum of Free Russia,” a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
“Since the issue of a more practical level regarding lustration was raised, we are already working, we have created a “Putin list”, the base of the “Putin list” is a huge job.
And by the way, this discussion arose about this list. Can we, do we have the moral right to give a moral and political assessment to these people and add them to our database? We answer: yes, we can.
Including because we indicate a certain guideline for how people should act if they, at a minimum, do not want to participate in the fight against the Putin regime, but at least not to participate in its preservation. Therefore, for them, the moral assessment of what they do and the moral price must be very high.
Now, we have such a right - to give them this assessment and to do just that, to include them in these lists at our meetings. In the end, they are not shot or imprisoned after immediately being brought there,” Feigin said.
“If they want to somehow correct their karma in this wheel of Samsara, then this is all done very simply. For example, I’m returning to Moscow tomorrow, I live there, directly in Russia, and I’m not telling all the details, what delights my life is covered in, including through all these comrades who want to simultaneously sign letters and do something in as proxies of this power, but at the same time to be loved, that is, to turn a blind eye to all these moral transgressions.
They have an open opportunity to support not necessarily us, not necessarily the forum, not necessarily its activists, but simply to make it clear that they adhere to these moral assessments - what is good, what is bad, what we do not yet see behind these people, behind these collaborators ", the liberal added.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.