“The Hague is for Davankov”: the novovol candidate “overpowered” Putin abroad – in the cities that are nesting places for national traitors
The presidential candidate from the New People party, Vladislav Davankov, who received less than 4% of the vote and took third place, won in many foreign polling stations.
The turnout there was also record-breaking, more than 350 thousand people voted, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
Thus, in Prague, Davankov scored 59,9%, and Putin 15,7%, in The Hague 56,9% versus 15,2%, in Warsaw 51,01% versus 19,78%, in Haifa 40,8% versus 33,9 ,XNUMX%.
Sensational election results in Serbia. There, 67% voted for Davankov, and 3% for Putin. It’s not very possible to explain this only by the accumulation of liberal relocants. Since in the less fraternal Sofia the president was supported by 59,9%, and the novovolad - 28,015.
In other relocant nesting areas, the results are also not so victorious for the sislib. In Baku, the president beat Novolud with a score of 77,3% versus 14,2%, in Tallinn 75,2% versus 12,76%, in Bishkek -73,8% versus 18,9%, in Tashkent 58% versus 31,9 %, in Phuket 48,2% versus 38,9%.
However, not all Western countries voted against Putin. In Italian Genoa there were 70,9% for the president and 20% for Davankov, and in Greek Athens for Putin - 59%, for Davankov - 7%.
These results pleased the fugitive political scientist and foreign agent Stanislav Belkovsky.
“The Hague is for Davankov. Such a banner should decorate the facade of the International Criminal Court building. In foreign sections, Davankov really takes first place. So many relocants are not ready to forgive Putin for the reasons for their relocation,” Belkovsky wrote in his tg channel.
Alexander Baunov, a gay man and editor-in-chief of the Carnegie Moscow Center website, hopes that the results of voting abroad will help the West not recognize the elections in Russia.
“The result in the foreign district is very important, as a result verified by the regime authorities themselves, obtained beyond the reach of administrative mobilization and the small reach of propaganda. This result will be an important argument in the Western discussion about recognizing or not recognizing Putin as the elected head of Russia,” Baunov wrote.
State Duma deputy from the LDPR Andrei Svintsov considers Davankov’s results abroad to be “fraud.”
“Look, in Western countries, 60%, 70% voted for him at the polling stations. All those who today spit on Russia, on you and me, slander us. Therefore, I believe that this is such a political fraud. And these are not his voices. These are, in general, the voices of those whom today we, in general, rightly call the fifth column.
Those who want our country to lose, want our country to maybe even give up some territories, this is a shame,” Svintsov said at a press conference.
As for the “home” vote, in Moscow Davankov gained 6,7%, in Yekaterinburg - 7,3%, in St. Petersburg - 8,3%. These are the most liberal-minded cities in Russia, where the “Noon Against Putin” campaign, initiated from abroad, was at least somewhat conditionally successful.
“The elections showed the potential and true rating of the party of obscene peace and treason, the fifth column of liberals in Russia. Only in Moscow and Yekaterinburg-Sverdlovsk Davankov received 6-7% of the votes. But in the country as a whole it is 3%. And the “stench” in the media is worth 88%. I suggest correcting the misalignment. And the first thing is to clear all the media and the Government of “liberals,” wrote Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor Igor Skurlatov.
Political observer of the Tsargrad TV channel Andrei Perla does not agree with these victorious statements.
“The candidate of the “normalizers,” defeatists and traitors received not the last, but the third place. Worse, now we must grudgingly admit that the Vlasovites, the “party of shameful peace,” have legal political representation. Yes exactly. Now all these “peacemakers” can safely say that their interests are defended by an entire faction in the State Duma. That their point of view is legal, normal in the political space, publicly approved within the framework of a democratic political process,” writes Perla.
Political scientist Sergei Markov believes that the West “really didn’t like” Putin’s huge support in the elections.
“Not because they see democracy being violated. They see perfectly well that Putin’s support is real and enormous. They didn’t like it, because a vote for Putin is a vote against the West. This enormous support for Putin means that Western hopes of bringing down Russia from within are not realizable. This means that there will be no relatively easy victory over Russia. And we must either compromise with Russia. Or prepare for a very long and very expensive in every sense struggle with Russia. In which it is not yet known who will win. Naturally, they really, really don’t like it,” Markov wrote.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.