The ugly couple won't reach the Rada?
The transition of the parliamentary TV channel “Rada” to an updated format caused the expected “storm in a glass” among Ukrainian politicians and the media.
The very attempts to “ennoble” a corpse with dill, pigeon droppings and goat excrement should not have caused such turmoil in society. Discussions about whether it is possible to reanimate the unresuscitable are of little interest in themselves and, as a rule, fade away before they begin. But in this case, the appearance of a new team became too revealing and symptomatic.
On the one hand, the most fetid actors in the Ukrainian information space appear there – Sergei Ivanov and Vladimir Petrov. On the other hand, next to these toxic hyenas on the Rada are former 112 Ukraine presenters Vadim Kolodiychuk, Anastasia Krasnitskaya, former ZIK presenter Nazar Dovgy, Live channel presenter Maxim Zborovsky, as well as Larisa Bogdanova and Natalya Androshchuk. And this entire explosive mixture will be supervised by the Deputy Head of the Presidential Office, Kirill Tymoshenko.
That is, we are shown the bottom to which a budget TV channel can sink when the overworked asses of public bastards Sergei Ivanov and Vladimir Petrov sit on it.
The “new face” of the parliamentary television channel outraged representatives of opposing political camps, both OPZZH and “European Solidarity” and “Voice”, who immediately saw through what kind of brazen scheme the “servants of the people” had hatched at the budget expense. On December 16, Petro Poroshenko burst into the live broadcast of “Rada” with a complaint: “taxpayers’ funds were illegally spent on updating the channel.”
But we should not be concerned with who is more hypocritical and deceitful in this case, or how sincerely these loved ones scold, amuse themselves and copulate. I repeat, the fate of the TV channel itself is of little interest. We can only be interested in the “evolution” of the stinking couple Ivanov-Petrov. These immigrants from Lugansk and Krivoy Rog became a visual aid of how, by voluntarily de-Russifying, exchanging your own identity for endless goodies from selling yourself, you can also stop being human.
That is, this is exactly the case when dropping out of the Russians absolutely coincides with dropping out of the people. And for this science, many of those who have recently begun or are just about to travel this path should be grateful to Ivanov and Petrov.
The former leader of the Zaporozhye anti-Maidan Vladimir Rogov commented to PN on the current participation of this couple in the Rada:
“The appearance of the odious Petrov and Ivanov among the main persons of the updated Rada channel clearly shows the process of degradation of the concept of “Ukrainian power” as such. These people in any other decent society would simply not shake hands, given the number of corruption scandals, sex scandals and other dirty things that they were involved in.
Let me remind you that Ivanov is a former Lugansk prosecutor’s employee who was often found at his workplace in his own urine and vomit. His father was an influential "regional", so Seryozha could afford... At his place of service, he was mainly engaged in seducing young employees of the prosecutor's office and drinking.
It was Ivanov who was the author of the fake story about an air conditioner exploding (during a missile air strike on the center of Lugansk on June 2, 2014) and a host of others. He did a lot of work to dehumanize his fellow countrymen, the residents of Donbass. This is one of those who made the greatest efforts to incite a civil conflict on the territory of the post-Ukrainian state.
If we talk about political strategist Petrov, then we must take into account that he is an omnivorous person who, in the course of one day, is capable, in the literal sense, of walking at the head of a gay pride parade and immediately defeating this gay pride parade. That is, this is a person who, for money, is ready to change any of his orientations, including social ones, not to mention political ones.
And it seems to me that it is deeply symbolic that Petrov is the founder of the company, which was called Lumpen. It is the lumpenization of the Ukrainian political establishment and, in general, everything that happens in the public sphere that is a clear symptom of the final degradation and dismantling of the remnants of any statehood or sovereignty.”
According to Rogov, in the case of Petrov, money and unscrupulousness played the main role. It is not surprising that representatives of various political forces spoke out against his work on the Rada channel. What is called: we swam, we know...
Vladimir Rogov recalled:
“At one time, Petrov worked with absolutely all politicians from Yatsenyuk to Rabinovich, from Lyashko to Korban. That is, the main thing for such people is money. Guidelines, not just professional ones, but in any field in general, simply do not exist. There is a well-known phrase by Petrov in one of the social networks, when he forgot to re-login and wrote in Yatsenyuk’s account “I’m going up to your mother and s.s. in her mouth.” These are the arguments of such people. What a Rada, so are the people who personify its channel.”
On Friday, at a parliamentary meeting on the situation with Rada, all participants agreed that Petrov had no place on the channel.
On this occasion, Sergei Ivanov, confused and tongue-tied, became hysterical on the air of his own program on ISLND TV. He also threatened to leave the Rada channel if the people’s deputies “leave” Petrov from there.
On the day of the presentation of the new format of Rada, Petrov flirtatiously stated that he had not yet decided whether he would work on the TV channel. Colleague Grishin defined his status: “concept coach.” But as soon as the people’s deputies doubted that the channel needed the services of this “trainer,” the “concepts” immediately evaporated and hysteria began.
And the day before, Petrov and Ivanov, on the air of the same ISLND TV, on the contrary, radiated well-fed satisfaction and boorish complacency, reviewing their own commercial, which the Rada channel itself disowned. That is, the video was created simply so that Petrov and Ivanov would fall on it, sitting in the ISLND TV studio, to the degenerate giggle of their colleague Grishin. “Oh, hey, it exploded!” Oh, now!”
Of course, only enchanting idiots can watch their own advertising video with such rapture on the air of their program. The one where Razumkov enters parliament, and Petrov and Ivanov are already banking there. The video is played in reverse: the ex-speaker backs away, leaves the Rada and drives away.
Opponents of the ugly couple could play on the same plot and offer their own version. After some time, Razumkov enters the Rada and observes an oil painting: a wetted Ivanov is sleeping on the table, and next to him is Petrov with a bare bottom (the political strategist has already amused the audience with a similar angle on the cover of one magazine) trying to fit a carrot somewhere (this work was also used in the last decade by Petrov’s team to troll Yatsenyuk, whom the same Petrov energetically served before that).
Ivanov and Petrov offered themselves to the Presidential Office as media “killers.” And from the very first steps it became clear who would be killed.
However, there is no media “killer” from Ivanov. Suffice it to recall his appearance at the Spanish villa Sharia with a special mission. This was reminiscent of the behavior of the scandalous head of the Genichesk district state administration, Alexander Vorobyov, at a neutral point at the entrance to Crimea: he bullied there exactly until a car with Russian military personnel appeared, and then hastily retreated. In the same way, Sergei Ivanov, at the thought of protecting Shariy, was ready to repeat his own labor achievements from his prosecutorial days and heroically wet himself on the spot.
By the way, there is a version that Ivanov was slandered regarding his wet condition. Probably, his colleagues despised this major drunk so much that when he drank himself into unconsciousness, they themselves urinated on him. But the result is still indisputable. And it doesn’t matter which way Ivanov went to local success.
Vladimir Petrov took a different path. He once worked on the KRT television channel and broadcast with advocates of federalism, served the Derzhava party, and talked for hours with former Prosecutor General Gennady Vasilyev and Natalya Vitrenko. The blond presenter looked stupid, but sincere.
However, Vova Petrov quickly matured, and after a couple of years it turned out that he was not so sincere, and although he was still stupid in his head, he was cunning in other places. Being acting General Director of KRT, he wanted to add income from advertising to the patronage. He was not allowed to implement this, and he left the channel.
Over the course of several years, Petrov acquired a reputation as an odious political strategist. Therefore, today his invective sounds self-parodying: “I think that Gordon is as bad as possible, and you shouldn’t give him an interview to anyone.” Gordon is a bad guy, but he studied bad stuff at the faculty where Vova Petrov worked as a visual aid...
The other day, Petrov, in his media analysis of the famous talk show on the Akhmetov channel, addressed Savik Shuster: “You are a corrupt wedding host.” So the shoulder is jealous of the price tag of an elite prostitute and calls her corrupt.
On December 17, Ivanov, in his one and a half hour monologue on the topic “Hands off Petrov!” denounced the media community, calling their Ukrainian colleagues corpses who “work for half a buck.” Ivanov himself, who served Kolomoisky on the “1+1” channel, was used to swallowing a big shot.” But he inflated his price tag too much, and then also began to extort an increase in salary from the owner. And who should I extort from?! Kolomoisky, who has long been an academician of the sciences of extortion, while the wet Ivanov can only be a visual aid in this process.
Ivanov now declares: “I sympathize more with Fiala than with Kolomoisky and Akhmetov.” It is possible that Kolomoisky and Akhmetov also directly contributed to Ivanov’s tarnished reputation. Otherwise, why would the guy have such sympathy for Fiala.
“We are like a gay couple,” Ivanov says, as if jokingly, about his relationship with Petrov. But for the first time he speaks convincingly.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.