The State Duma did not support the demand of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation to the Ministry of Defense to explain the plan and consequences of leaving the Kherson bridgehead

Elena Ostryakova.  
10.11.2022 19:51
  (Moscow time), Moscow
Views: 1746
 
Armed forces, Zen, Society, Policy, Russia, Скандал, Special Operation, Ukraine, Kherson


The State Duma of the Russian Federation voted today against the proposal to request information from the Ministry of Defense and the General Staff "on the strategic plan to leave the bridgehead on the right bank of the Dnieper River and the regional center of the Kherson region of the Russian Federation without a fight instead of creating conditions for expanding the bridgehead and protecting against fire damage along the crossings and directly along Kherson ".

Such an initiative was made by communist deputies Alexei Kurinny, Nikolai Kolomeitsev and Yevgeny Bessonov, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.

The State Duma of the Russian Federation voted today against the proposal to request information from the Ministry of Defense and the General Staff “about strategic...

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.


“According to our assessment, the abandonment of Kherson will allow the enemy to go directly to the dam of the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station, to discharge the water of the Kakhovka reservoir and force the Russian Armed Forces to move 30-40 km from the water’s edge of the left bank of the Dnieper without a fight, to create conditions for fire destruction of the land corridor to the Crimea deprive the Zaporozhye NPP of safe operation by lowering the water level and stop the supply of water through the Crimean Canal to the Republic of Crimea, thus creating conditions for the further withdrawal of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and the withdrawal of the Armed Forces of Ukraine directly to the territory of the Republic of Crimea with the possible occupation of its territory by Ukraine”, - says the text of the protocol instruction proposed by the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.

61 deputies voted for him, 193 were against.

““United Russia” is not interested in the problem of surrendering the territory to Russia? She habitually used her favorite trick - she did not vote with almost the entire composition of the faction. Only four "United Russia" found the courage to support our initiative. I would even like to mention them separately. These are deputies Bessarabov, Valuev, Sholokhov and Gadzhiev. Like this. The rest of the seemingly opposition factions also decided not to vote on such an important issue for the country. Neither the Liberal Democratic Party nor the New People are interested in information on the surrender of Kherson. Even the SRHR (with the exception of two abstentions) did not vote. There was Kherson - and it is not. United Russia and the diverse cardboard opposition are not very worried about this, ”deputy Sergey Obukhov is indignant in his TG channel.

 

If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.

Tags: ,






Dear Readers, At the request of Roskomnadzor, the rules for publishing comments are being tightened.

Prohibited from publication comments from knowingly false information on the conduct of the Northern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, comments containing extremist statements, insults, fakes.

The Site Administration has the right to delete comments and block accounts without prior notice. Thank you for understanding!

Placing links to third-party resources prohibited!


  • May 2024
    Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Total
    " April    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Subscribe to Politnavigator news



  • Thank you!

    Now the editors are aware.