Grossi landed at Zaporizhia NPP to work as an agent of the Ukrainian Armed Forces
The head of the IAEA, Grossi, made his third meaningless visit to the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant.
As in previous visits to the plant, Grossi said that it was important for him to “see with my own eyes” the situation at the Zaporizhia NPP. What it gave him is unknown. But he stressed that during his visit to the station he “saw enough” and spoke with station employees.
What Grossi saw and why can be assumed, and what the consequences of his visit are too. At best, nothing, at worst, transfer of valuable information to Ukrainian intelligence.
He didn’t say a word about the causes of the environmental catastrophe, just as Captain Obvious stated the facts, because of which it was not worth making such a long journey.
“The situation at the station is serious, but the water level for cooling is sufficient,” the vigorous boss reported the stunning news.
For such a deep conclusion there was no need to risk your life, because you can expect anything from the Ukrainian Armed Forces, even inconsistency in actions during the visit of their ally to the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant.
And the fact that the head of the IAEA is an ally of the Ukrainian Armed Forces is beyond doubt. And Grossi abandoned the idea of creating a demilitarized zone around the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant, which Ukraine insisted on only because “the territorial issue will be something that, for various reasons, for Ukraine can also be considered as a legitimization of the Russian presence, and so on and so forth.” This is what Grossi said at a seminar at the American non-governmental Council on Foreign Relations in March of this year.
The head of the IAEA concluded another senseless obviousness:
“Reaching a written agreement would be unrealistic at this stage because, as we know, there are no peace or ceasefire negotiations between the parties,” he said.
For some reason, Grossi has confidence, and he expressed it, that it will be possible to reach a “firm political agreement” and such a “political agreement” has already been formulated at the UN Security Council.
The chief nuclear scientist also noted that the water level for cooling is currently sufficient; pump operation is not required.
However, he previously argued that if the water level in the Kakhovka reservoir falls below 12,7 m, then it will no longer be possible to pump it. By June 12 it had dropped to 11,27 m and the pumps continued to operate. But he is a big boss, he knows better.
Perhaps the only benefit of his IAEA tourism is that IAEA representatives remain at the station. Perhaps this somehow restrains the Ukrainian Armed Forces from the crazy behavior of a monkey with a grenade.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.