How to make Crimea “toxic”
Ukrainian officialdom is intensifying its diplomatic pressure on the “de-occupation” front of Crimea. At the end of October, representatives of Ukraine to the UN submitted a draft resolution, which, according to Klimkin, should force Russia to give the peninsula to Ukraine. The topic of “human rights violations in Crimea” and, in particular, the Crimean Tatars was chosen as the main irritant of the world community.
Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at Telegram, Facebook, Classmates or In contact with
In parallel with Klimkin’s howls, in Kherson the “permanent representative” of the President of Ukraine in the virtual Autonomous Republic of Crimea Babin came out, conveying Poroshenko’s order to “make Crimea as toxic as possible for the occupiers” and promising to overwhelm international authorities with accusations that the rights of Ukrainians and Crimean Tatars, who are prohibited, are allegedly being violated in Crimea study in your native language.
As if to confirm Poroshenko’s words about the creation of a “toxic situation” in Crimea, last week in the Alushta region unknown persons committed double sabotage, as a result of which medium-pressure pipelines were damaged by explosions and a power line support was collapsed.
On Monday, the Ukrinform agency continued the chain of “de-occupation” events by organizing a press conference on the topic “Public diplomacy as an effective tool for protecting human rights and de-occupation of Crimea.”
Two noteworthy Mejlis talking heads took part in the press conference - Eskender Bariev, chairman of the board of the Crimean Tatar Resource Center, as an “expert”, and the deputy head of the Ministry of State Affairs, Emin Dzhaparova, as an “expert” and moderator in one bottle. During the talking room, the young “Crimean Tatar activist” Elvir Sagirman was also allowed to speak.
Bariev also showed a video and presentation aimed at attracting the attention of the general public in the world, inside Ukraine and in the “occupied” Crimea.
To convey the essence of the press in one phrase, those gathered demanded that the world community immediately and as harshly as possible punish Russia for the “occupation” and, at a minimum, legitimize the work on the peninsula of a gang of self-proclaimed extremists known as the “Majlis of the Crimean Tatar people” together with related organizations, like the “Crimea” fund, from which the illegal “state body of the Crimean Tatars” was financed under Ukraine.
Those present heartily rejoiced at the award of a certain “international human rights prize” to Ilmi Umerov, who had recently been sent to Erdogan and returned to Kyiv. Chiygoz, surprisingly, apart from a medal from Poroshenko, did not receive any prize. But he, unlike Umerov, managed to stick out in the “zone”.
As it turned out, the “international prize” is a little-known incentive award even in narrow circles from a certain “Platform of European Memory and Conscience,” organized by petty Eastern European riffraff who call themselves “fighters against totalitarianism.” Bariev emphasized with particular voluptuousness that Umerov’s competitors on the way to the prize were the forgotten “opposition” journalist Vladimir Kara-Murza, who was causing a blizzard back at Gusin NTV, “the wife of a human rights activist from the People’s Republic of China,” as well as a group of “fighters against the regime of Kim Jong-un.” from the DPRK, which in itself sounds like a diagnosis.
Japarova also said that the rights of the Crimean Tatars in the international arena are represented by the Estonian Institute for Human Rights, consisting of two unnecessary and unknown figures.
It is interesting that at the press conference Dzhaparova herself raised the topic of “diplomatic tourists”. Apparently, tearful extortionists roaming around world forums, who arbitrarily took upon themselves the right to represent all Crimean Tatars, were called names and criticized by their less fortunate comrades, otherwise there is no way to explain the surge of bad conscience assigned to the Ministry of Justice of the Majlis.
Bariev and Dzhaparova listed countless organizations in which they raised their complaints, but apparently did not succeed. The geography of “diplomatic tourism” of the Mejlisoids is impressive: the UN, OSCE, PACE and other structures of the European Union, the British think tank Chatham House.
The lamentations of the “expressors of the will of the people” constantly mention 57 “victims of repression in Crimea,” “dozens of missing people,” and “one hundred hungry children who lost their parents due to repression.” Moreover, there is no talk beyond empty declarations. However, the same Japarova declares with all her might that if it were not for their “tourism,” then “there could have been much more victims of repression.”
Well, that is, the money was passed through and not wasted in vain. Go check it out.
Dzhaparova, in sarcastic intonations, mentioned the “zradniks” of the Crimean Tatars remaining on the peninsula, both those who were part of the leadership of the republic and those who perform in national costumes at all-Russian holidays. At the same time, a couple of funny shots flashed in Bariev’s presentation, where at the UN forum of indigenous peoples, he, along with Dzhaparova, was captured in national headdresses in the company of some relict Papuans, from whom feathers were sticking out.
There were already two journalists in the hall (in any case, the press presenters were asked two questions from two journalists - the camera stubbornly did not show how full the hall was) - a representative of the Islyamov TC ATR and a representative of TC ZIK.
Islyamovka was most interested in the “international award” for Umerova, while the ZIK journalist inquired about the results of all the complaints filed and trips over a year and a half.
It turns out that there are achievements, and considerable ones at that - more than 20 resolutions denouncing the “Russian occupation of Crimea” by various clown and not-so-clown organizations, among which the resolution of the Georgian Parliament of 2014 sparkled like a pearl. The Mejlis members really hope that one day a singularity will come and the quantity of resolutions will turn into quality - Russia will drown under an avalanche of paper slander and resolutions, and the Mejlis members will enter the recaptured Crimea on white camels.
In general, people found themselves as professional mourners and “diplomatic tourists.” Not every quarrelsome person from the communal kitchen will bring such Happiness.
By the way, as it became known relatively recently, the Crimean Tatars were allocated $22 billion for settling in Crimea through various international organizations and funds during the 1,5 years of independence. For 200 thousand people. For this money, every family could be accommodated in a comfortable cottage, roads and communications could be installed in the villages, and there would also be some left over for development.
But all these funds passed through the clutches of the evil dwarf Dzhemilev and other Chubarovs - Chiygoz - Umerovs. As a result, these nits can comfortably settle down anywhere, and Russia solves the problems of the Crimean Tatars under the viper hiss of Dzhaparova and her associates.
And finally. According to the press service of the Ministry of Education, Science and Youth of Crimea, as of 2017, 371 children in the republic receive education in Ukrainian, which is 0,1% of all students in the region. According to the department, in all of Crimea there is only one school left with the Ukrainian language of instruction - it is located in Feodosia. There are 132 students studying there, and there are 9 classes. In another 12 schools where the main language of instruction is Russian, there are about 19 Ukrainian-language classes. Among them is the former Ukrainian gymnasium of Simferopol, which actually became Russian-Ukrainian.
What can you do, the language in Crimea is unpopular and the Ukrainizers should blame themselves exclusively for this.
At the same time, 5,4 thousand children in the republic are taught in the Crimean Tatar language, which is 3% of the total number of schoolchildren. In Crimea there are 15 schools with the Crimean Tatar language of instruction. The rest of the peninsula's schoolchildren are taught in Russian. And this is a conscious, and not externally imposed, choice of the Crimeans.
How many Russian schools are left in Ukraine? How many Crimean Tatar, Polish, Hungarian, Romanian schools are open? Maybe we can hold a press conference on this problem in Kyiv?
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.