“Do you want Crimea? Go and conquer it yourself!” – Poroshenko bought the loyalty of idiots for show off
The statement of Lyashkov deputy and party member of the Azov regiment Igor Mosiychuk, who last Friday in his blog said: Poroshenko plans to send to the Ukrainian parliament in September a document on the renaming of Crimea into Tatar autonomy, as the Mejlis members have been demanding for a long time, was offensively neglected.
Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at Telegram, Facebook, Classmates or In contact with
The situation around the bill “on Crimean Tatar autonomy with the right of self-determination” is already beginning to heat up. Almost synchronous statements followed from Lyashko and the entire faction of the Radical Party in Zrad that they would not allow any more autonomies on the territory of unitary Ukraine, since this would lead to the final destruction of Nenko. They say, today give in to the Crimean Tatars, tomorrow leave it to the Hungarians, the day after tomorrow the Romanians or Slovaks will want to leave.
If something happens, Lyashko’s deputies promise to disrupt the vote.
Judging by the way the interested media Mejlis woodpeckers responded to this news, things are heading towards a serious rupture of the lower information chakra.
Cunning eastern propagandists do not skimp on jubilation and praise for the wise Poroshenko.
The Mejlis propagandist Muzhdabaev is the most indecently rejoicing and setting off firecrackers, claiming that the Kremlin is terribly afraid of the bill, panic reigns in the Russian media, and the autonomy granted to Poroshenko will allow extremists to return Crimea in the near future.
It seems that the finest hour has come, a sweet and intoxicating moment of the long-awaited “peremoga”. The two-hundred-year-old dream of the Crimean Tatar nationalists came true: Ukraine gave them Crimea. But! Did it really come true and was it a direct gift? Here's the question.
As is often the case with Svidomo of all stripes, they are ready to completely spread the seething brown substance in their own heads to other people. A small monitoring of the official Russian press indicates that the “Kremlin leaflets” barely shrugged their shoulders and stifled a yawn in response to this “epoch-making event”, moving on to covering more noticeable and important news, which is traditionally rich in August every year.
The only thing I would like to advise the exalted Muzhdabaev is to take a loading dose of sedative tablets and douse himself thoroughly with cold water. Cooling his head and emotions will help him look at Poroshenko’s decision from a different perspective, when the firebirds of the party are steadily turning into slimy toads of evil.
What, in fact, will change from adding some new words about Crimea to the Constitution of Ukraine? For Russia – absolutely nothing. Doesn’t Muzhdabaev think so? These are personal problems of Muzhdabaev and the scoundrels he serves.
No foreign country will help Muzhdabaev. In order for foreign countries to react with due attention to Poroshenko’s new Crimean demarche, only one, but very important little thing needs to be done - return Crimea to Ukrainian control. But since Crimea is Russian, and it is impossible to change this harsh fact from the outside (and the Kremlin kicks out all attempts to revise the status of Crimea, considering the issue closed), rewriting the Ukrainian constitution on the status of Crimea is nothing more than an attempt by Kyiv to influence the weather on Mars .
Moreover, Poroshenko, through show-off, literally for a piece of paper with printed text, bought the loyalty of idiots like Muzhdabaev. Absolutely without sacrificing anything or risking anything on your part. One can even say that the gnawed bone he threw to the Mejlis activists has a not-so-disguised mocking subtext addressed to the Chubarovites and Islyamovites: “Do you want Crimea? So go and conquer it yourself.”
It seems that Poroshenko’s approval was perceived as a guide to action by the leader of the thugs, Islyamov, who once again spoke in the Ukrainian media with threats to return Crimea by force.
“We need to strengthen our forces internally and prepare to liberate the territory. If necessary, by military means. We, Crimean Tatars, will not allow anyone to decide the fate of Crimea without us. We ourselves, together with mainland Ukrainians, will decide his fate,” said the leader of Asker.
It seems that Muzhdabaev, Islyamov and others like them have been keeping their brains in a box of mothballs for the last 25 years, because due to their extreme stubbornness and unwillingness to face the facts, the Mejlis “activists” have not understood anything and do not want to learn anything.
Apparently, we need to start with the fact that the Mejlis members and the “Svidomo from the mainland” from the very beginning of “Independence” were very conditional allies, the only unifying factors for which were hatred of Russia and practical Russophobia. Moreover, from the very beginning, each of the parties tried to have a “partner” for their own selfish purposes, preferring not to give anything in return.
Hatred is a bad material for creation - it is destructive, but it is precisely this simple thought that stubbornly does not enter the heads of both “partners”.
In particular, the “Nezalezhniki” used the “Majlis” as a strike force against the Russian population of Crimea, while the Mejlis members themselves did not see Crimea as part of Ukraine in the long term. It was just that Banderaism and total Ukrainization benefited them, since the Russians suffered from it. But since there was an administrative resource behind the Ukrainian raguls, the shavarniki got more benefit from the “Majlis” than the “Medjlis” from the shavarniki, in fact, as of February 2014.
All that the leaders of the “Majlis” were able to achieve from Kiev were minor concessions, such as the unpunished theft of aid to the Crimean Tatars, protection and running local businesses on criminal “concepts”, having an illegal executive body of the “Majlis”, pocket militants, working for the Turkish secret services and react harshly to any attempts to self-organize the Russian population of Crimea.
Even under Yushchenko, the “mezhdlis” failed to extort two very important decisions from Kiev: a) consider the Crimean Tatars autochthons (i.e., spontaneously born in a given territory before the hatching of the first proto-Ukrainian) and b) legitimize Crimean Tatar autonomy in Crimea .
Why didn't Kyiv do this earlier? Everything is very simple. Both decisions placed the Crimean Tatar minority in Crimea in a dominant position. Actually, not even the population, but the self-proclaimed “Majlis”, who carried out trials and reprisals “in the name and on behalf of the people.” Considering the toughness and uncompromising nature of the Mejlis members, you don’t need to go to grandma to understand that having captured the commanding heights in Crimea, the Mejlis will try to get rid of any control and any observers from Kyiv. Further, things on the peninsula could easily follow the “Ichkeria” scenario, since the main role models for the Mejlis members were the leaders of the Chechen militants. Kyiv was not in any mood to get its own “Ichkeria”, and therefore the ambitions of the Dzhemilev-Chubarov gang were restrained by Kiev.
With the victory of the “guidance”, the situation changed dramatically and the Mejlis members who fled for Perekop and Chongar, looking back at their sister-in-law Raguli, took over as much weapons and power in the regions of the Kherson region bordering Crimea as they could bite off. Until the spring of 2017, the Confectioner’s gang was solving a difficult problem - by any means necessary to corral the Islamist militants and use their bad energy to benefit the junta. We can already say that they succeeded.
Now, looking at the depressed askers, in Kyiv they decided to cheer them up and stimulate them a little. And this refreshing pill was Poroshenko’s firm promise to recognize Crimea as the national autonomy of the Crimean Tatars at the constitutional level. As usual, bypassing any norms and rules, without holding any referendums, but simply taking into account the wishes of a group of criminals and renegades. The very fact that the Ukrainian authorities and the “Majlis” completely ignore the Crimean referendum of 1991 indicates that they are ready to walk through a legislative minefield, not caring about possible consequences in the future. We need to be more careful.
But who in post-Maidan Ukraine pays attention to such little things as observing the spirit and letter of the law?
It must be assumed that now from the entire Majlis kubl the powders are expecting a return in the form of an oracle and stench on a universal scale, directed against Russia, with a demand to urgently return to them “their own autonomy.”
However, if you think about it, apart from the stench and scream, they have no other measures left to influence Russia. Russia has already taken care of eliminating most of its own vulnerable positions on Ukrainian territory. Now Ukraine is free to take whatever steps it wants: shoot itself in the foot, get in wherever it kills, swim behind buoys, stand under an arrow, introduce a visa regime. In a word, have a blast and don’t deny yourself anything.
In addition to encouraging Islyamov, Chubarov and Muzhdabaev, Poroshenko
took another step, which his Mejlis wards are unlikely to immediately notice and appreciate, being in the frenzy of “peer-friendly” euphoria: “Crimean Tatar autonomy” will become a good distraction for the Chubarovites, so that their interest in creating their own khanate in south of Kherson region.
Mejlis leaders will be toying with the idea of returning “their own Crimea” for a year, or even more, since Poroshenko agreed to “give it” to them. And while all the futility of their throwing reaches the Kazan-heads, the hunters will come up with some other stupid entertainment for their cheburek army.
As mentioned above, for Russia and Crimea, any decision of the Ukrainian authorities will not change anything - Crimea will continue to remain part of Russia. But this does not mean that nothing will change for Ukraine.
It seems that the most interesting thing in the matter of “national autonomy” will be the fight between Ukrainian and Crimean Tatar radicals. Crimea may be lost to them, but the issue is fundamental for both sides, especially if we take into account the label “with the right of self-determination”: some need “legalization” to create their own khanate, confirmed by presidential and parliamentary papers, others are ready to lay down their bones, but not even allow shadows of “self-determination” with the right for any territory to secede from Ukraine.
If the spiders do not agree, then the split in the already heterogeneous environment of radicals and extremists in Ukraine could develop into a real war.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.