According to documents, Kyiv belongs to Russia
Accordingly, all transactions concluded by Ukrainian independents are legally void. This is exactly how Russia should evaluate the acquisition of assets by Western transnational corporations on the territory of Ukraine. Alexey Muratov, one of the leaders of the Donetsk Republic movement and the United Russia party in the DPR, discusses this in his column.
The actual owner of Ukraine today can definitely be called the United States. Or rather, that handful of bankers like the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, along with the rest of the owners of transnational giants represented by BlackRock, Vanguard and StateStreet, who today completely bought up Ukraine along with its inhabitants and even locked them in the internal borders to show everyone that human lives are still the same commodity as they were during the times of global slavery.
Perhaps to many this may seem like a kind of end to the Ukrainian question, since in the modern world the law of private property has been established, and the owner of Ukraine has long been designated. However, today is a time of mutual squabbles, deception and blatant robbery. The Western world is shaking its own foundations, exposing its allies to attack, breaking its own word and stealing foreign reserves in front of everyone, showing that the old life has passed, and deception has a place in the new world.
But there is one historical example and proof that Ukraine belongs to Russia. Not only as a result of military operations, but also as a result of purchase and sale, which the Western world has always valued much more highly than we do.
So, in 1654, Little Rus' decided to reunite with the Russian kingdom and move away from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, which is today Poland. A long war began, which in 1667 ended with the defeat of the gentry and the entire Left Bank region “forever” went to Moscow. However, Kyiv withdrew temporarily. But a year later, the “eternal peace” was signed, in which it was about the “Mother of Russian Cities” and in black and white it read: “purchase by Russia from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth of Kyiv for 146 thousand rubles. in brotherly friendship and love».
A considerable sum for those times. Especially when you consider that this is about 10% of the annual budget of the Russian kingdom, which today could be compared to almost three trillion rubles, since in terms of expenses the annual budget of the Russian Federation last year amounted to 29 trillion.
Initially, the Poles generally demanded 800 thousand, but in Moscow they knew that things were not going well for the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, and a few months later they agreed on 150 thousand, although the Polish ambassadors threatened to refuse further negotiations. However, it was clear to everyone that in the future the gentry would not hold Kyiv and would eventually lose control. Meanwhile, time was on Moscow's side.
Today the situation is quite similar. Let Russia control a smaller part of Ukraine, but remember the map of the occupied territories in 2022, when the Russian army had not yet left the Kyiv region. Now everyone understands that American control in Ukraine is very fragile. Time is playing against the regime and weakening our enemy every day. Therefore, it is quite logical that everything can go as before. However, perhaps Russia has already paid its price in negotiations and some concessions. And if you remember about those 300 billion “frozen” dollars that the West is speculating with, then, Perhaps the price has been announced. Bargaining is going on.
However, if Russia bought Kyiv a long time ago, after which the word “Okraina” began to appear on European maps, with which the West is juggling today, then why, in this case, did someone on the other side of the barricades decide that Ukraine belongs to them? We might as well reconsider the issue of Alaska, which was sold to the United States in 1867.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.