A Kiev journalist pointed out inconsistencies in Gritsak’s version of the “Ruban case”
Kiev journalist Igor Burdyga drew attention to the inconsistencies in the official version of the “Ruban case” presented by the head of the SBU Vasily Gritsak - about the alleged preparation of a coup d’etat and the murder of the president and the heads of the country’s special services, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
Burdyga wrote about this on his page on the social network, publishing two photos to confirm his opinion.
“The top photo shows weapons seized by the SBU from the van of Vladimir Ruban in February 2018, the bottom photo shows weapons seized by the SBU from the van of French citizen Gregoire Mouteau in May 2016. Today’s briefing by Vasily Gritsak is most reminiscent of the briefing dedicated to the detention of Muto in June 2016. In both cases, the head of the SBU talks about irrefutable evidence of the preparation of terrorist attacks, the victims of which were to be civilians. Let me just remind you that in the case of Muto, for a year and a half, the SBU did not prove the Frenchman’s guilt in court. their only evidence in this case is surveillance tapes with dubious translations. Let’s see what happens this time,” writes a Kiev journalist.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.