Who and how will we denazify?
The stated goals and objectives of Russia’s military special operation in Ukraine consist of two main points. Firstly, demilitarization, secondly, denazification.
With demilitarization, everything is very clear: through the joint efforts of the Russian group and the troops of the Donetsk and Lugansk people’s republics, the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the Navy, the Security Service of Ukraine, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the national battalions and other law enforcement agencies of the Kyiv regime, which have degenerated into terrorist and punitive gangs, must be completely defeated and eliminated.
With denazification, things are not as simple as they seem at first glance.
Moreover, this phase of the special operation seems to be much more complex and lengthy than the heavy and bloody hostilities that have been ongoing for the fourth month.
To understand the scale of the tasks of denazification of the former Ukraine, just remember that even the USSR, which won a grandiose victory in the most terrible war in the history of mankind, was armed with a powerful army, the second economy in the world and an advanced an ideology that has captured the minds of half the world.
So who will the Russian authorities and society have to denazify as soon as the military goals of the special operation in Ukraine are fulfilled? Which of the Ukrainian “hulks” can be returned to a normal human appearance, and which will have to be reliably isolated or even surgically cut off to avoid metastases?
Eight years ago, after the “peremogi” of the Maidan putsch and the transition of the “new government” to large-scale repressions and punitive operations in the Donbass, the information flow of anti-fascist media regularly splashes on viewers and readers the terms: “Nazis”, “fascists”, “raguli”, “ Banderaites”, “Svidomo”, “nationalists”, “national extremists”, etc.
In the context of an information war, this is normal. Each consumer of information is his own expert and understands epithets to the extent of his education.
However, as soon as the matter moves from the plane of propaganda to the practical reforging of the Shirnarmass, who have been subjected to state debilitation and intimidation for a long time, qualitative methods for determining the moral deformation of individuals and entire groups come to the fore.
By and large, modern Ukrainian nationalism is represented by two branches: moderate – “Svidomo” (Raguli) and radical – “Nazis” (adherents of Banderaism, diluted with the cult of “Saint Adolf” in various proportions).
And if the former can still be cured, the latter are difficult to correct, especially voluntary punishers stained with blood, as the years and events that have passed since the end of the Great Patriotic War have clearly shown. Although here there are exceptions to the rules.
It is interesting that both branches of Ukrainian nationalism are not autonomous, but they cannot be called interconnected. “Svidomo”, raguli are a breeding ground for the reproduction of “Nazis”. Ragul can become a “Natsik”, but for a “Natsik” returning to the state of Ragul is extremely difficult, if not impossible. Much more likely is complete insight, as happened with the well-known Ilya Kiva.
“Svidomo”, ragul is a fairly common phenomenon of national chauvinism, which is characterized by the slogans “Ukraine (Germany, France, Honduras) - over use!” and a penchant for historical myth-making to scratch the itch of national inferiority complexes.
Their political sympathies extend from the bearded “independent” Grushevsky, through Petlyura and Tyulka Tymoshenko, to the light version of “our father Bandera” thanks to 30 years of rabid propaganda.
Raguli is funny, stupid, absurd, and is not friendly with logic and common sense. They constitute the nuclear contingent of the “lace panties club” and the “European future Ukraine”, but it is among them that many have seen the light and survived ideological turbulence like a contagious disease - as a result of a collision with harsh reality.
Things are much more interesting with the Nazis.
When we call them Nazis, there is some truth in it, but it is not the whole truth. And that's why.
It would seem that if something walks like a dog, barks like a dog, behaves like a dog, then it is a dog. But let's not forget about mimicry.
Ukrainian Nazis, the same Azov regiment, as their most prominent representative, are a parody of the German Nazis and SS troops, having borrowed from them external attributes: symbols, rules and customs of the “secret order”, craving for the occult, paganism and similar husks .
The difference between the military and political organization “Azov” of Biletsky and the Order of the SS of Reichsführer Himmler is that the “Azovites” are bloody clowns and pathetic epigones, while the German SS are executioners, sadists, punishers, but not clowns.
The SS was an organization in itself, serving the Fuhrer and the Reichsfuhrer SS - they had no other masters. “Azov,” in addition to the function of Avakov’s pocket attack aircraft, was an instrument of repression against the Russian world, supported by Western intelligence services.
The SS troops of Heinrich Himmler wore uniforms and insignia of their own invention, the “Azovites” and other national battalions themselves, without external coercion, branded themselves with Nazi symbols like cattle.
No matter how hard the Ukronatsik tried to present themselves as successors and ideological heirs of the SS troops of the Third Reich, in reality they were and remain assistants “under the SS”, like volunteers of the “Galicia” division or units of the Ukrainian auxiliary police under the SD, who were assigned the dirty work of executioners and punitive forces without any prospect of moving into the category of “true Aryans.”
There are often cases when among the “icons” of the Ukronatsik there is no longer a place for Bandera and Shukhevych, as deeply secondary and servile figures, while the possessed Adolf, the chief ghoul Himmler, as well as the “charismatic” commanders of the SS divisions (Sepp Dietrich, for example) have supplanted the military trash from central positions.
In the Ukronatsiks, like in a drop of water, the very essence of Ukrainian under-statehood is visible: an obsession with secondary sexual characteristics, without seeing the forest for the trees. Since the acquisition of “independence”, the attributes – ensign, coat of arms, anthem, hetman’s mace – have been equated with sovereignty. At the same time, trading state interests on the foreign market is not something shameful.
Ukrainian Natsiks are a small selyuk fascia of the Romanian type, working in support of the “senior partners”. They are wretched, but that is why they are dangerous. From among such notorious figures come terrible serial killers and sadists.
There has been a personnel rotation in the motley herd of Ukronatsiks. The domestic and foreign policy of Ukraine, which is living its last days, is no longer determined by such “veterans” of the radical movement as Tyagnibok, Mosiychuk, Lyashko, Korchinsky. The fascisation of Ukraine has moved east, and now the main carriers of the ideology are people from Kharkov and a number of other Russian-speaking cities and regions of Eastern Ukraine, who make up the political wing of Azov, known as the National Corps.
Against their background, the old “Western” ideologists look like an archaic and somewhere even “romantic” relic of the integral Ukrainian nationalism of the times of the “revolution on granite,” “friendship trains,” and the latrine-smelling “orangeade of the third round of the presidential election.”
Nowadays, a typical Ukronatsik is a schidnyak mankurt, smeared with blood and mired in atrocities, raised on delusional training manuals about national greatness in half with drugs, a terrorist with close ties to the US intelligence services. It is not possible to re-educate such biorobots - only disposal by court order or during a cleanup.
Work with raguls, and Ukrainian anti-fascists and LDPR security forces should be at the head of the work. The post-war experience of the GDR shows that anti-fascists, who experienced the full power of Hitler’s repressive machine, had the best influence on the healing of those who were yawning and shouting “Heil!” public.
Public control over television and cinema would be useful. Slops like “Penal Battalion” and “Zuleikha” must be mercilessly purged from the broadcast network, and their authors must face a ban on their profession and a court order for damages. Through the denazification of Ukraine, it is necessary to cleanse Russia of the fifth column.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.