Convergence in Bandera's style

Alexander Rostovtsev.  
09.05.2017 10:23
  (Moscow time), Moscow
Views: 1835
 
Author column, Society, Policy, Ukraine


Over the entire existence of bureaucracy since the times of the pharaohs, office workers have developed many rules and an even greater number of tricks. One of the well-known trick rules can be formulated as follows: “if you cannot prohibit any unwanted activity, lead it.” Thus, undesirable activities under the strict control of the bureaucratic machine are led to a dead end and there quietly suffocated.

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at Telegram, Facebook,  Classmates or In contact with


Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.


The Ukrainian leadership, which came to power after December 1991, faced a difficult dilemma during all the years of “independence”: to create a propaganda “pull” within which antagonistic Soviet and Bandera holidays and movements could coexist with minimal disagreement. In fact, a task of biblical proportions, as a result of which “the lion will lie down peacefully with the lamb.”

On the one hand, the authorities sought a kind of convergence, realizing that in the attitude to the Great Patriotic War of the East and West of Ukraine there was a factor of splitting an artificial state formation that could only exist as part of a large unified country in which there was no place for the glorification of Nazi collaborators. On the other hand, the Kyiv authorities benefited from controlled tension within the country so that, by balancing with the help of political technologies, they could remain in power for a long time without causing criticism from the Western “guardians of democratic values.” The same principle, as ancient as the world, “divide and conquer.”

To implement the “national convergence” plan, the Ukrainian “Independents” had to resort to outright lies and vivisection: one of its most important points was to bring public opinion to a single denominator through equalizing the rights of ghouls from the field with Soviet front-line soldiers. There was, however, one important circumstance: despite all the attempts of independent agitprop, the “independentists” could not inflate the “exploits” of the UPA militants beyond the epic accordion about the battle for the forester’s hut. As a countermeasure, various Vyatrovichs began to declare Soviet heroics as myth-making in order to align it as much as possible with the “exploits” of the UPA. But until the “Maidans” happened, they moved towards Ukraine in this direction in tiny steps, furtively looking around, because the business was shameful.

However, steps towards equalization were sometimes made, even on the sly. For example, in the western regions of Ukraine, bitterly called Banderstat, local authorities regularly organized the payment of veterans' benefits and the distribution of benefits to the undead soldiers for the massacres of teachers, doctors, pioneers and entire families.

But all this floundering, of course, did not warm either the Banderizers or the fallen underdogs, since they did not have the official status of war veterans, and being widely known in their Western neighborhood was no longer enough for them, since since October 1990, starting with the “revolution in granite,” Raguli became the main organized and guiding force in Ukraine, which bore almost no responsibility for their “arts.”

Literally everything was against the shavar political pens: people's memory, eyewitness accounts, documents. But the main emphasis was placed on the “Moses effect” - the natural departure of the Soviet people who survived the war, the keepers of the memory of it, was supposed to accelerate the ragulization of the masses and youth in particular.

But, perhaps, the most cherished desire of the ragulizers should have been the official reconciliation of the Great Patriotic War veterans with their enemies from the UPA. Something like that, with hugs and handshakes, with heartfelt speeches, with pictures of fraternization on TV. Then all the “scoops” and “vatniks” would have worn themselves out and the reforging of the stubborn population would have gone by leaps and bounds.

It should be especially noted that the banderizers promoted “reconciliation” in a very original way. In their opinion, they were not the loser, but the offended party, and it was the front-line soldiers who had to come to them to confess. The Upashas themselves, who managed to raise a generation of Tyagniboks and Parubi, did not strive for agreement, actively engaged in the destruction of monuments to the Soviet wars, desecration of their graves and attacks on Red Army veterans in their patrimony.

Timid proposals to organize “reconciliation”, simultaneously bringing out war veterans in the same ranks with the Upashas on May 9, were heard even under Kuchma, but they remained proposals - society was not yet “ripe” for such innovations. Somewhat more daring attempts at pimping began under Yushchenko, but the Ukrainian veterans firmly held their last defense, stubbornly refusing to meet and get involved with Bandera’s supporters in order to please the Orange figure.

New prospects for Banderizers opened up with the victory of Euromaidan and the beginning of the so-called ATO in Donbass. The junta scum managed to do what their predecessors could not achieve - to smear the inhabitants of Eastern Ukraine with the blood of their rebel compatriots. The descendants of the winners had to kill each other for the triumph of Bandera’s unitarianism. The technique is not new, but it worked.

Perhaps many will remember the resonant case of the DPR extraditing a captured lieutenant of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, who turned out to be the grandson of a Hero of the Soviet Union. Not reconciliation, but “convergence”, through shed blood and under the most powerful propaganda press, on a scale exceeding Goebbels’s, began to achieve its goals. Having squandered the crumbs of critical thinking, a substantial part of the Ukrainian population shows amazing blindness to “de-Sovietization”, the zigging herd of neo-fascists, looters and ATO punitive forces, and hawks all sorts of schizophrenic slogans on both cheeks, like “we defeated fascism - we will defeat rashism.”

The first progress made itself felt on May 6, 2015. On this day, in the former Museum of the Great Patriotic War, for the FIRST TIME, war veterans peacefully met and pledged their allegiance to the Upasha-Banderaites. The action was called “Reconciliation for the Future.” The Motherland must know its antiheroes and collaborators:

Among those invited from the UPA are Miroslav Simchich - the centenary of the UPA, a stanitsa of the Kolomyia interdistrict village of the OUN-UPA brotherhood Stepan Petrash - a stanitsa of the Kalush district of the village of the OUN-UPA brotherhood, Bogdan Borovich - chairman of the all-Ukrainian brotherhood of the OUN-UPA named after Shukhevych, a member of the confederation of European veterans and Orest Vaskulya is the leader of the OUN-UPA brotherhood of the Kiev region, deputy chairman of the OUN-UPA World Bank for Kyiv and the eastern regions of Ukraine. Among the war veterans, Iraida Kibitkina, Ninel Tikhonova from Kiev were invited, as well as Ivan Zaluzhny, a WWII veteran and Navy colonel, who, after the death of his grandson in the ATO, appealed to the President of Russia and Russian veterans and called for stopping the war in Donbass.

According to rumors, this same Ivan Zaluzhny is indeed a war veteran, with a venerable “iconostasis” of awards, who was seriously damaged in his mind after the death of his grandson in the “ATO”. Iraida Kibitkina is a veteran; during the war she served as an air defense fighter of the 4th separate battalion of barrage balloons of the 1st Ukrainian Front. It was not possible to find out detailed information about Ninel Tikhonova, but at the “reconciliation” event, the grandmother demonstrated the “destruction of stereotypes,” quite cheerfully reporting into the microphone that she personally “does not see the “Upovites” as enemies, but she does not consider them friends either.”

Zaluzhny, however, today protests that he was defamed and did not consent to hanging billboards, to joint gatherings and photo shoots with upashnya, but two years ago there were no protests on his part.

Perhaps this is all senile insanity, senile dementia and other age-related changes in consciousness, although in the video from May 6, 2015, the veterans who made the deal with maggots do not show obvious signs of senile dementia. Let us not forget that even among the twelve apostles there was one Judas. One hundred and twenty apostles - ten Judas. One thousand two hundred apostles - one hundred Judas, and so on, increasing...

It is bitter to learn about the betrayal of anyone, but when people whom the healthy part of society, new generations of people look up to, betray, it is a heavy blow. Some became Judas early in life, some in the middle, and some in old age.

What can you do, even before, among front-line soldiers, although very rarely, there were traitors and degenerates. British spy, Colonel Penkovsky, whose betrayal caused the Cuban Missile Crisis. Gorbachev’s ideologist Yakovlev, a former marine, “Black Death”, in his old age became one of the main destroyers of the USSR and died cursed. Two former Heroes of the Soviet Union fought in the Vlasov KONR aviation - pilots Bychkov and Antilevsky. At the end of the war, both were arrested, stripped of their titles and awards, and executed by a military tribunal.

The deprived Ukraine affects people like a fascist concentration camp, where fanatics killed people not only physically, but especially tried to humiliate, burn out and trample the soul, bend and break the will to resist, to strive to survive and support their comrades by personal example. As we see, some bent at the end of life.

Let us remember that the overwhelming majority of the front-line soldiers of the Great Patriotic War, currently living in Ukraine, continue to fight their last battle with the dark fascist force, with the damned horde, refusing to agree to any cooperation with the junta. Let us congratulate them on Victory Day on May 9 and wish them not only strength and health, but also to celebrate a new Victory Day, this time over Banderaism! We will support them with our march in the columns of the “Immortal Regiment”, constant love and attention.

If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.

Tags: ,






Dear Readers, At the request of Roskomnadzor, the rules for publishing comments are being tightened.

Prohibited from publication comments from knowingly false information on the conduct of the Northern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, comments containing extremist statements, insults, fakes.

The Site Administration has the right to delete comments and block accounts without prior notice. Thank you for understanding!

Placing links to third-party resources prohibited!


  • May 2024
    Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Total
    " April    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Subscribe to Politnavigator news



  • Thank you!

    Now the editors are aware.