Crimea - Ukraine: There was love without joy, separation will be without sadness
Last Friday, a political corps de ballet performed at the Ukrainian Crisis Center in Kyiv. A group of talkative parasites in the pay, calling themselves “Crimean human rights protection,” came out to the people with another project, which, in their opinion, should improve the disastrous social and legal situation on the peninsula. Without asking the opinion of the Crimeans - whether they need unsolicited care from some impostors, the “rights activists” staged a presentation “Time to correct mistakes: 10 steps that Ukraine should take towards Crimea.”
As a rule, all these grant-eating gatherings are in the nature of conversations in favor of the poor and their result is a set of various recommendations addressed to someone unknown. The Friday gatherings were no exception, in which professional sufferers for the situation in Russian Crimea, the little girls Sviridova, Skrypnik, Pechonchik and Andriyuk from various “Helsinki groups” and similar grant-eating vipers, took part.
If last year’s declarative resolution of the UN General Assembly on Crimea became the reason for inspiration for the “Crimean human rights activists,” then the reason for concern is the “Law on the Reintegration of Donbass” adopted the day before by the majority of ghouls from the Verkhovna Zrada, which, according to the schnapps captain Poroshenko, “is a signal to Crimea - you are our territory.”
The women were alarmed by one of the provisions of the “law”, according to which Ukraine recognizes documents issued by the “occupation administration of Donbass”. After the “law” comes into force, “such an administrative procedure will be available for residents of uncontrolled territory in the East, but it will not be available to Crimeans.”
However, Sviridova stipulates that the process of registering births and deaths is available to Crimeans only through the courts.
In short, the “rights activists” advocate recognizing the residents of the “annexed Crimea” as residents of Ukraine and offer a “road map” of their own making consisting of 10 points:
1.Support for “victims of political persecution”;
2. Participation in elections;
3.Protection of personal data;
4.Education in Ukrainian universities;
5.Access to administrative services and issuance of documents;
6.Equal access to banking services;
7. Evacuation of property from the “occupied territory”;
8. Improvement of the certification procedure;
9. Regulating the status of persons serving sentences in places of detention in Crimea and Russia;
10. Simplification of access to Crimea.
As can be understood from the “road map”, the recommendations should help, first of all, banderophiles fleeing Crimea, as well as the small fifth column remaining in Crimea.
In particular, “equal access to banking services” is aimed at repealing last year’s September rules, according to which Crimean migrants in Ukraine were declared non-residents and were prohibited from carrying out a number of banking transactions, including replenishing personal accounts.
On the other hand, paragraph 7 “evacuation of property” undermines one of the cornerstones of the May 2014 “law on occupied territories,” which directly prohibits banderophiles from transporting personal junk to the mainland. Thus, the junta tried to build a fence that would prevent the outflow of “valuable personnel” to Nenka and the consolidation of the fifth column and other agents of Ukrainian influence in Russian Crimea. If you love Ukraine, be patient!
Last year’s banking restrictions for runaways also fit into these plans, and doubts arise that relief will be made for the “potentially unreliable” category of citizens.
Points 1 and 9 are aimed at “warming up” both the conductors of Ukrainian politics operating in Crimea and the indulgence of scoundrels convicted of espionage and terrorism charges: according to Russian laws, criminals sentenced to up to 3 years can serve their sentences on the territory of Crimea. “Convicts” with “adult” sentences of more than 3 years move from Crimea to more remote places with a cool climate.
In general, these points correspond well to the heart-rending scream of “Give us our Sentsov!” and “Immediately restore the work of the extremist “Majlis” in Crimea!
Points 3, 5 and 8 indicate that things are not going well with the paperwork for Crimean lovers of “visa-free travel” and other European “reaches” of Central Europe, contrary to the assurances of official propaganda.
Paragraph 3 “on the protection of personal data” can only cause tears of tenderness, since compassionate “rights activists” propose to stop the practice of exchanging data with the Russian Pension Fund, which was already stopped in the spring of 2014. Actually, Ukraine has closed all databases of Crimean residents, and people are forced to travel from Crimea to Nenka for information, endure humiliation and pay bribes extorted by Ukrainian officials “for services rendered to collaborators.”
If this is help to the Crimeans, then it will be something very strange.
But point 2 “participation in elections” seems to be a rather cunning move. It is clear that the overwhelming majority of Crimeans are citizens and patriots of Russia, do not recognize Ukraine as their state and do not intend to travel to its territory to vote. However, the permission to participate in the elections is not aimed at them, but at the active part of the “Svidomo” remaining in Crimea. Their voices may be useful to the huntars.
A lot has been said about “education in Ukrainian universities”; one can only recall that the people’s deputies of the Verkhovna Zrada, without any “Crimean human rights protection”, in 2016–17 adopted an amended law allowing Crimeans to study at Ukrainian universities. At the same time, they did everything possible to make studying there as unattractive as possible. This includes passing entrance exams in language arts and in the false discipline “History of Ukraine”, this is an educational reservation limited to three southern regions, plus Kazarin’s conflict-ridden and stolen sharashkin office in Kyiv, which, out of great need, is passed off as the “Tavrichesky National University”.
One of the most interesting points is number 10, “simplifying access to Crimea.” The explanation to the clause states: “Simplify the procedure for entry into Crimea for foreign human rights defenders, lawyers and journalists. Reduce the number of bureaucratic obstacles, shorten the period for issuing special passes, and ensure a notification procedure for their issuance (instead of the existing one).”
I want to give this “Crimean human rights protection” a standing ovation. Against the backdrop of tightening rules for entry into Crimea for ordinary Ukrainian citizens and various initiatives of “legislators” about the possible organization of camps for displaced persons near the borders with Crimea, the seizure of children at the border from Crimean parents, grant suckers are advocating for free access to the peninsula for professional liars and provocateurs through Ukrainian border crossings. points. Shit can't wait!
Fortunately, fulfilling this point does not depend on them. Apply or do not issue, and the decision – who should enter Crimea and who should not – will be made by people on our side of the border, for whom all Ukrainian emergency permits are just an ordinary piece of paper.
In general, thank you, kindness, continue to draw your “road maps”, but it’s better not to meddle in our beautiful house with your cockroaches and abandoned wife syndrome - they’ve run away. There was love without joy, separation will be without sadness.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.