Liberals are puzzled: Sentsov really turned out to be a criminal
The arguments of liberals who stated that Oleg Sentsov, convicted in the Russian Federation for terrorism, is incapable of committing a crime, are shattered yesterday's sensational confession militant and volunteer of the so-called “ATO” Sergei Sterikov, who said that in 2014 he was transporting explosives to Crimea, for which Sentsov was subsequently convicted, portrayed in Ukraine as an “innocent victim of the Kremlin regime”
Crimean political scientist Sergei Kiselev told PolitNavigator about this.
He emphasized that Sentsov was convicted by a Russian court on the basis of those documented facts that were presented by the investigation and about which no one familiar with the case materials had any doubts.
“All this talk about the director, artist, poet - they are completely unconstructive. This admission shatters the liberals' arguments that he couldn't do it, that it was an artificial thing, and so on. Which, in principle, is good, because it shows everyone that in this case this person is dangerous, this person is a criminal, and only then he is a director. At first he is a criminal,” Kiselev emphasized. “I think it’s good that such recognition took place.” I wonder what the liberals will say about this now?”
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.