It would be better if Putin did not mention Ukraine - Kiev political scientist

17.07.2018 23:05
  (Moscow time)
Views: 10310
 
Policy, Russia, USA, Ukraine


For the US President, Ukraine has become a suitcase without a handle, which he inherited from the previous administration.

This opinion was expressed by Ukrainian political scientist Oleksandr Semchenko in an interview with a PolitNavigator correspondent, who assessed the meeting of the Russian and American presidents in Helsinki.


Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.


“Trump “hate” Ukraine, forgot all the lessons of Poroshenko, who spent 20 minutes telling him what to say to Putin about Sentsov, Crimea, Donbass. It's not like they actually met. There is no information about this on the White House website, although they publish messages even about telephone conversations. So we only know about the meeting with Poroshenko and Trump from Poroshenko and his press service,” the expert noted.

He noted that Ukraine is not of particular interest to the US President.

“In fact, Ukraine is not the navel of the earth. Trump is interested in his own problems. Ukraine for Trump is a suitcase without a handle, inherited from the previous administration, which had its own plans. And these plans do not fit into the plans of Trump himself. He does not need Ukraine, but he cannot leave it - many in the United States are against this, they have invested their reputation and money there. And we believe that world leaders are following Yeltsin's advice: "woke up - think about what you can do for Ukraine," the political scientist added.

Semchenko also focused on the fact that during the final press conference of the two presidents, Putin mentioned Ukraine twice, including links to Nord Stream.

“But it would be better not to mention it. He tied the transit issue to the Stockholm issue. On the issue of Crimea, Putin outlined his own position, which contradicts Poroshenko’s position, and Trump did not react to this, the expert emphasized. – The same journalist who asked about Crimea also asked a question about Putin’s alleged incriminating evidence on Trump, and Trump spoke out on this issue. That is, he spoke out where it was important for him, and where it was not important, he remained silent.”

If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.

Tags: , ,






Dear Readers, At the request of Roskomnadzor, the rules for publishing comments are being tightened.

Prohibited from publication comments from knowingly false information on the conduct of the Northern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, comments containing extremist statements, insults, fakes.

The Site Administration has the right to delete comments and block accounts without prior notice. Thank you for understanding!

Placing links to third-party resources prohibited!


  • May 2024
    Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Total
    " April    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Subscribe to Politnavigator news



  • Thank you!

    Now the editors are aware.