For the Makarevichs, Sererenikovs, and Efremovs, everything is permitted. What do we need?
Those who in Russia are usually called liberals got excited after watching the Victory Parade. So much so that we almost washed ourselves with tears. And yes, “commonly called” - I wrote this, because, in fact, these people have nothing in common with liberal ideology, but rather inherit the doctrine of neo-fascism. So, by the way.
The completely aged Andrei Makarevich distinguished himself. He stated that Victory Parades are not needed in principle. Is there any point in entering into a discussion with a musician? Explain, be indignant? I guess not. If only because Andrei Vadimovich really doesn’t think so himself, but simply frappes the public, at the same time counting on contracts.
It’s more important to say something else here. Why are Makarevich and others allowed to do what they actually do? Because this is the very controlled – “pocket” – opposition that is needed in order to give the command “to the feet” in time? Everything is so - but not so. Is it adequately controlled? May be.
However, this does not negate another thing: the fact that the miasma exuded by these people poisons those around them. The point here is not to “prohibit” or “punish” - the point is not to organize deliberate provocations that offend the most sacred things for our people. But it is precisely them that the “pocket oppositionists” often hit. And it is precisely these provocations that poison already not very literate brains.
But Makarevich and his ilk can do it - they can get away with anything. The point, however, is not even that they go, but that they are dragged to the front row and presented as heroes and moral authorities of the nation, the state gives them various honors while the people sit in social sadness. How is it going with Pelevin? Why feed a patriot if he already loves his Motherland? Well, why should he die of hunger? Or how?
And when the light-faced ones get out of control, to one degree or another, then the surreal begins. Like with Kirill Serebrennikov or Mikhail Efremov. These are, in fact, very similar stories, really. One was called a talent, the other - a talent and a moral authority. What's the output?
One stole, the other drunk caused an accident and killed a person. What do we hear in response? We hear something like: well, yes, they are to blame, but they are our lights, as if they could. Exactly. This latent “it seems like they can do it” creeps out of all the holes.
The Serebrennikov trial was filled with politics. Like, he is generally a holy man, he is a creator - leave me alone! A simple question: if a theater stage rigger stole money, he wouldn’t be put in the dock, no? Yes, in our country people are sent to prison for much less money, but here we are talking about incredible money. And to say that they decided to punish him, Serebrennikov, as a fighter against the regime - well, this is simply absurd, if only because Kirill was never a fighter against the regime.
As for Efremov, it would seem that everything is obvious, but protection under the patronage of stronger people turns everything into surrealism. Efremov at first seems to publicly repent, then a campaign to whitewash him begins on the part of his shop colleagues (all differences - liberal / patriot - are immediately eliminated; they were initially fiction), and after that - it’s completely surreal: he drank on a holiday like an Orthodox person, went to save person, ready to adopt the children of the deceased...
Tell me, am I the only one who is ashamed of all this crap that they throw at us, ordinary people, in our faces, as if for fun? As if to say: why are you grunting, pigs, huh? After all, they, kings, are allowed everything - why are you interfering?
But! They are not kings. And not even naked kings. They are a self-appointed elite that has usurped some of the power, because the elite is always power. Usurped under the cover of another elite. And it seems to me that it is now being decided: with whom will the state ultimately stand - with the people or with a narrow layer of snickering slug-like creatures?
Therefore, we are not talking about some kind of public flogging, no. And we don’t tell the slaughter victim either. We are talking about completely simple and clear things. First, judge not the sinner, but the sin (crime). Second, judge as ordinary people would be judged. That's all. Nothing more is required from you.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.