Malaysian Boeing shot down by Ukrainian pilot Voloshin – media
Moscow - Kyiv, December 23 (PolitNavigator, Mikhail Stamm) - In the “Malaysian Boeing case” a “secret witness” appeared, whose testimony clears all charges against the militia and Russia. And they explain the mysterious behavior of Western experts,” writes "TVNZ". According to him, the airliner was shot down by Ukrainian pilot Vladislav Voloshin. A witness named Alexander told the publication exactly how this happened.
Subscribe to the news "PolitNavigator - Kiev" в Facebook, Classmates or In contact with
“This man came to the editorial office of Komsomolskaya Pravda himself,” the newspaper writes. “We checked his documents - he is not an actor or a figurehead. We cannot yet disclose the real details of the witness - our interlocutor has relatives in Ukraine and he is afraid of revenge and blackmail.”
This is what this man himself, whom the newspaper introduced as Alexander, said.
“I was on the territory of Ukraine, in the city of Dnepropetrovsk, the village of Aviatorskoye,” he says in an interview with the publication. - This is an ordinary airport. Fighter planes and helicopters were based there at that time. Planes regularly flew and bombed, Su-25 attack aircraft bombed Donetsk and Lugansk.”
According to Alexander, of the eight aircraft, only two were equipped with air-to-air missiles. The missiles were suspended under their wings. At the same time, there were no air battles.
On July 17, planes flew regularly in the morning. “In the afternoon, about an hour before the Boeing was shot down, three attack aircraft were lifted into the air. I don't remember the specific time. Of the aircraft, one was equipped with such missiles (air-to-air - editor's note). It was a Su-25,” says the witness and emphasizes that he saw it personally.
He could not confuse the type of ammunition suspended under the wings, Alexander assures: “They differ in size, plumage, and color. With guidance head. It's very easy to identify her."
“After a short time, only one plane returned, two were shot down. Somewhere in eastern Ukraine, they told me so. One plane returned, on which these missiles were suspended,” the witness continues. – He returned without the missiles. This pilot was very scared.”
According to KP’s interlocutor, he was not closely acquainted with this pilot, whose last name was Voloshin and whose first name was “Vladislav, it seems.” I won't say for sure. Captain". “Voloshin is about 30 years old. His unit is based in Nikolaev – his unit was recognized as the best unit in Ukraine in 2013,” the witness later added.
Alexander was surprised by the absence of air-to-air missiles, since, according to him, they are not included in the main ammunition load - they are suspended on a separate command. In addition, the missiles were decommissioned and had expired, he claims. “But literally the day before, a week before this incident, the use of these missiles was urgently extended,” says the witness.
When the frightened captain Voloshin was taken out of the plane, he, according to Alexander, uttered the phrase: “The plane is not the same.” And there was an evening phrase, a question from one pilot to him, to the same one, to Voloshin: “What’s wrong with the plane?” To which he replied: “The plane ended up at the wrong time and in the wrong place.”
According to the witness, he himself is not a pilot, so he did not know what and how the pilots of the unit said about this case - they are reluctant to communicate with lower personnel. He himself imagines the situation like this: since two planes of his comrades were shot down that day, Voloshin became nervous and “maybe mistook the Boeing for a combat aircraft” - it’s difficult to determine at a great distance. But for a rocket this distance is quite surmountable, and the Boeing’s speed is not a hindrance for it. Even if the Su-25 does not rise to the height of the airliner, it “can simply raise its nose up, and there will be no problem in registering this and launching the missile. The flight range of this missile is more than 10 kilometers.”
About himself, the interlocutor of “KP” said that he left for Russia because he was intimidated by the SBU and the National Guard: “People can be beaten for any careless word, imprisoned for any insignificant suspicion of sympathy for Russia or the militias. And I was initially against this “anti-terrorist operation”.
“We do not have the opportunity to check all the testimony of the witness,” the newspaper summarizes, “but the first thing we managed to find out is that Captain Voloshin actually exists in the Ukrainian army.” The publication publishes a photo of the pilot with the caption “Vladislav Valerievich Voloshin – flight commander, captain. Awarded the Order of Bohdan Khmelnytsky for participation in the ATO.”
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.