Bulk boys in the eyes
For several days now, social networks have been discussing the scandalous incident that occurred on Friday evening, May 26, near Arbat, on Vozdvizhenka Street in Moscow.
According to those who like to download human rights everywhere and see in everything the “leaden abomination of Putin’s government,” “a nine-year-old boy read Shakespeare’s poems to passers-by, but the police who ran up to him twisted the young reciter’s hands and threw him into jail, and with him the woman who stood up for him.” .
Gevalt bombed in an exemplary manner. Both ordinary people, the media, and especially liberal “legalists”, who are trying to analyze, on the basis of photographs, exactly what provisions about the police were violated by patrol officers during the incident. The case turned out to be so resonant that the Investigative Committee began checking the actions of the squad.
The sweetest part of this whole scandal is that the entire information flurry and seething of substances exploits one single point of view, the journalist of the odious “Radio Liberty” and TK “Do///d” Lucy Stein, posted on her Facebook page.
We present the original text without changes.
“They just grabbed a boy who looked to be about nine years old who was reading poetry at a garbage dump, shoved him into a wheelbarrow and took him away alone in hysterics. They didn’t introduce themselves or explain on what basis. I and another girl were pushed to the ground. tried to film their faces, but was hit before the camera could catch focus. the child can be heard screaming in the video. There is a car number. I'm going to the Arbat police station, I'll try to figure it out. What should you do in such a situation?”
What should a journalist do in such a situation? Don’t lie, try to figure it out in good faith and find additional witnesses so that it doesn’t turn out to be “lying as an eyewitness.”
Fortunately, the place on Vozdvizhenka where the incident took place is crowded, and the rainy Lyusya Stein was not the only witness to the incident.
If we turn to calmer testimony and clear it of emotional overtones, the following situation took place.
On the evening of May 26, a police squad patrolling the same area of Arbat noticed a lonely boy of primary school age reciting poetry. In front of the boy stood an open thermal bag for collecting money.
According to witnesses, the young reciter did not read Shakespeare's poems. Shakespeare was credited as the scandal unfolded in order to give the conflict a more emotional overtones and to portray the authorities as “stranglers of young talents.”
The patrol officers, having seen a young boy, alone, in the evening, without accompanying persons, had the right to detain the child on these grounds alone to clarify the circumstances. But the poems and the open alms bag spoke of begging. The police squad, the men, so as not to frighten or injure the child, called a woman, a police officer, who conducted the interview.
The boy told the police his name and explained that he was indeed collecting money and was unaccompanied by his parents or relatives. Considering the circumstances, the patrol officers decided to take the young reader to the Arbat police station to call his parents. On the way to the car, a certain woman jumped up to the police, who had previously been sitting calmly on a bench at a distance and was in no way associated with the lonely boy standing alone. The lady demanded that the child be given to her, introducing herself as a neighbor. As the play progressed, the habalka got confused in her testimony and declared herself either a “neighbor” or “an acquaintance of his parents.” It is clear that the police simply did not have the right to leave the child to such a strange person.
Having received a refusal, the lady began to yell obscenities, attack police officers while on duty, provoke a conflict, attract the attention of passers-by and try to film her own coven on a smartphone camera, bringing punishment on her stupid head under Article 19.3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (Disobedience to a lawful order of a police officer). The child, however, also did not lag behind the “friend of his parents,” making a squeal and hysteria in public in the style of thieves and beggars caught red-handed.
Upon arrival at the Arbat police station, it was established that the violent woman was the boy’s stepmother. Later, the boy was handed over to his father, who arrived at the police station, since, having not reached 16 years of age, a beggar cannot be held accountable for the offenses he has committed.
It is interesting that defenders of the hysterical woman and the child beggar on social networks began to argue that a handbag with money on the porch is not a sign of begging. In their expert formulation, “a beggar is someone who pesters and annoys people.” And so, the boy seemed to be asking to top up his e-wallet for cuteness: “like it if you liked it.”
The boy’s father, Ilya Skavronsky, went even further and told Echo of Moscow with a blue eye that his son was thus undergoing personal training and getting rid of complexes. Apparently, Dad is alluding to the famous exercise in the training system of Japanese managers, who are forced to loudly shout all sorts of bullshit at busy street intersections.
Little of. Skavronsky-papa does not stop at Japanese methods, but tries to pass off everything that happened as a kidnapping. The child was supposedly in a public place, and they grabbed him without introducing himself, without presenting his identification, and dragged him to jail, and his wife was nearby...
Witnesses, however, claim that, “getting rid of complexes,” before taking his place in the position, he walked in circles and asked passers-by and drivers to “fill up his purse.” In addition, local residents did not understand at all why the fuss flared up. According to them, this is a completely everyday story. In the vicinity of Arbat, juvenile affairs officers always had a lot of work to do.
In short, the boy’s parents, radio freedom activist Lyusya Stein and the liberals blame the police for carrying out their official duties. It comes down to outright defamation of the police. They say, “they protect beggars, but this one was detained because he didn’t tell the police.”
One can only imagine what a howl would have arisen if the boy had gotten into some kind of trouble. There are plenty of degenerates in big cities. There is confidence that the squeal would have risen even if the patrolmen had ignored the minor beggar. I can see the headlines “Putin’s oprichniks indifferently passed by a child’s misfortune.”
Considering all of the above, the timely appearance of the whistleblower from Radio Liberty and the bombing of the pookan of the “couch brigade,” we may well be talking about a planned provocation. At a minimum, about creating an information feed.
In a year, presidential elections are due to take place in Russia. The protest resource of the bulkies is very limited and needs to be increased at any cost. Therefore, Russian maydowns will undermine the situation by involving children. When it comes to children, emotions usually overwhelm the mind. The average person obsessed with emotions does not care that law enforcement officers act in accordance with Federal Law No. 124 “On the Basic Guarantees of the Rights of the Child in the Russian Federation” - there will always be a holy fool who excites the public consciousness with an expose in the style of Pushkin’s “Boris Godunov”:
The king leaves the cathedral. The boyar in front gives alms to the poor.
Holy Fool: Boris, Boris! Children offend Nikolka.
King: Give him alms. What is he crying about?
Holy Fool: Little children are hurting Nikolka... Order them to be stabbed to death, just as you stabbed the little prince to death.
Remember the rage of the Kyiv townspeople, which resulted in the shock meme “They are children!”, in response to the Berkut dispersal of an organized crowd of “Svolotovites” and Right Sector activists who came to rock the student Maidan into rampant violence and lawlessness. Remember the March puppet masters bringing children to “anti-corruption” rallies.
We can also recall how the USSR was rocked and what a storm of emotions was caused by the events of April 9, 1989 in Tbilisi (the reason was the statement by the leadership of the Abkhaz Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic about the republic’s secession from the Georgian SSR). The Soviet people at that time were not yet accustomed to dispersing a crowd with batons and bird cherry, and therefore the matter gained unnecessary resonance. True, the resonance did not arise on its own, but through the efforts of deputies and “progressive forces”, which resulted in epic “accordions” about how “a Soviet paratrooper chased my grandmother for three blocks, overtook her and killed her with an infantry shovel.” Despite the fact that not a single person with stab, chopped or incised wounds was admitted to Tbilisi hospitals and morgues. “Grandmother” served as the same seed for rebellion as “their children.” It is known how strong the cult of veneration of elders is in the Caucasus.
All these lies and the Georgian rebellion stirred up Moscow. Thousands of students went into the city center to kill the cops, without even thinking about the quick grandmother who ran away from the paratrooper for three blocks.
It is obvious that the liberal movement will continue to use the issue of children as a sore point. It seems that legislators are going to pass a law banning the involvement of children in street political actions, but a specific episode with nine-year-old Oscar Skavronsky did not end in favor of law enforcement officers.
Lawyer Tatyana Solomina reported that the deputy chief of police for public order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for the Central Administrative District apologized to Ilya Skavronsky, whose son was detained on Vozdvizhenka. Solomina wrote about this on her Twitter:
“The child is at home. The deputy chief of police for the protection of public order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for the Central Administrative District apologized to the father. The protocol will be cancelled."
Solomina clarified that an internal investigation will be carried out into the actions of the police who detained the child in the center of Moscow. She emphasized that lawyer Anatoly Kucherena played a big role in this story. “None of this would have happened without the intervention of Anatoly Kucherena. It was really powerful,” wrote Solomina.
As we see, there is no shortage of influential “well-wishers” in bulk. This means that the year before the presidential elections in Russia, scheduled for the Day of the Reunification of Crimea with Russia, may turn out to be hot unless tactics are developed to competently counter provocateurs and dampen speculation on social networks. This is the same case when “wetting barmalei in the toilet” in Syria is more effective than forcing Facebook liars and provocateurs to respect the laws.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.