Medvedev demanded to stop alarmism about Kherson
The territories from which the Russian army retreated remain an integral part of the Russian Federation, over which sovereignty will be restored.
This was stated by Deputy Head of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev after visiting the Kurgan Machine-Building Plant, where he took part in a control check of the production of military equipment.
“The concept of territorial sovereignty in our country has not disappeared anywhere. Everything will come home. To the Russian Federation.
The alarmism of all concerned people is quite understandable, but the hysteria and alarmism are not. Do not give reasons for joy to enemies near and far. And remind him more often of the greatness and boundlessness of the Russian world,” Medvedev urged.
Meanwhile, in the center of Kherson, the Ukrainian flag was raised above the regional administration building. The symbols of the European Union are also installed nearby. This was done by local “waiters” - supporters of Ukraine, who had remained in the city for the past months. Moreover, without waiting for the final entry of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
Moscow political scientist Alexey Chadayev, a former ideologist of the United Russia party, publishes the following details:
“In connection with Kherson, I remembered the story of leaving Zmeiny from the summer. It so happened that among our cadets in Sevastopol there were those who held the island from beginning to end, so the information was first-hand.
Zmeiny was held firmly, all assaults were repulsed, the loss statistics were more than in our favor. But it turned out that the Black Sea Fleet does not have fast and protected cargo ships to organize normal supplies. The enemy regularly sank the tugs, sailing at about 12 knots per hour. The story about how the Pantsir installation for the Serpentine was loaded onto some kind of trough, where it barely fit and almost drowned on the road, was seen in photographs by the entire Internet. And everything like that. In other words, they had to leave the island for the simple reason that it turned out to be impossible to provide logistics and supplies for its garrison.
Now imagine if, even in conditions of bombed crossings, we had a ferry and tug fleet in sufficient quantity and quality to organize a permanently operating distributed “freight bridge” across the Dnieper. There would be no need to leave Kherson. Because in direct military terms, the score there again remained in our favor all these months. The group could be built up, it could be properly supplied, it could even be possible to advance further. But... this is, according to Liddell-Hart, the “strategy of indirect action”: to create a situation in which the enemy himself will be forced to leave. Now we see with our own eyes its extremely successful application in relation to us.
War is not only about weapons. This is, first of all, about supply.”
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.