Merkel admitted Putin's deception: What other “deals” with the West could there be?
Retired politicians or high-ranking officials are often start telling the truth. One that they knew before, but for various reasons, usually of a political nature, they kept silent during their tenure in their posts.
A striking example of such a breakthrough of truth is Carla Del Ponte - from 1999 to 2008 she was the chief prosecutor and prosecutor of the Hague International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. She passed sentences on the Serbs and acquitted the Kosovo cannibal terrorists - illegal traffickers in human organs who represented the “authorities” in Kosovo, cut off from Serbia. And when she left her post, she wrote a book about the inhuman atrocities of the Kosovars, because... knew in detail about all their crimes while in service.
Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel is another such example. – when the deed has already been done, it is impossible to change the course of history, then you can share the truth.
Merkel, in an interview with Die Zeit, admitted that the purpose of the Minsk agreements, the guarantor of which Germany was also a guarantor, was solely to strengthen Ukraine.
What motives Merkel herself has for telling the truth is not known for certain. But belated truth also has value. In order to call a spade a spade, to prevent distortion of History and to show who is the true culprit of the tragedy of millions, who ordered the crimes, and who was naive or a fully conscious pragmatic, self-interested performer. And there will be a Judgment.
Merkel confesses. Gives testimony that will someday be included in the case at the Tribunal for the former Ukraine:
“The 2014 Minsk agreement was an attempt to give Ukraine time. She [Ukraine] also used this time to become stronger, which can be seen today. The Ukraine of 2014/15 is not the Ukraine of today. As the battles for Debaltsevo showed in early 2015, Putin could have easily captured it then. And I very much doubt that NATO countries could have done as much then as they are doing now to help Ukraine.”
Merkel only confirms the same idea that former Ukrainian President Poroshenko had previously expressed - he stated that he never planned to follow the agreements.
Is this a revelation for the Russian side? Only partly. Merkel and her accomplices from Poland and France had already managed to commit a colossal deception - when representatives of their foreign policy departments signed the “Agreement on Crisis Resolution” on February 21, 2014 - on the same document with the then-legal President of Ukraine Yanukovych and the leaders opposition from the Maidan. A German, a Pole and a Frenchman, just a few hours after the signing, forgot that they were “guarantors” - they in no way condemned the coup d’état and the violation of the promises they had just made.
Was it possible to trust Merkel and company after this?, when were the first Minsk agreements signed - in September 2014, and then the next ones - in February 2015?
As we remember, both “Minsk” were the result of a military disaster of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the fronts of Donbass. And Kyiv needed an urgent pause. Otherwise, the death of several thousand more military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine was inevitable.
At that time, other arguments were also important for the Russian side. (rudiments of which still exist), except for requests from Merkel and Hollande for a pause in hostilities.
It was believed that numerous casualties among Ukrainian soldiers would have an extremely negative impact on the process of restoring fraternal relations between the two peoples in the future. And the opportunity to force the Donbass republics to be accepted into Ukraine on federal terms, taking into account all possible humanitarian, economic and even military-political requirements, will provide prospects for changing the foreign policy course and the vector of integration of Ukraine as a whole.
These were the hopes in Moscow, although the people of Donbass made their choice at an unrecognized national referendum back in May 2014 - following the example of Crimea. And “neither a carcass nor a stuffed animal” he wanted to return to Ukraine.
It must be admitted that the West managed to carry out its operation. Lies are their middle name. For them, this word or the signed agreement has no value - they will change the rules they themselves invented if there is a benefit in doing so. They will deceive, steal and even kill if they understand that there will be no serious consequences for them.
And in the case that Merkel is talking about, and what has long become obvious to everyone - NATO wanted to gain time to pump Ukraine up with weapons, to train the Nazi backbone of the army, and to create fortifications. The goal of all these preparations is the opportunity to resolve the conflict with Donbass, and, in fact, with Russia, by military means.
Unfortunately, the deception, albeit partially, was a success. With the participation of the same Merkel. The West has got time to reformat Ukraine into a militarized, extremely ideologized by Russophobia, Satanism and Nazism - Anti-Russia.
Yes, there were excesses in the perception of Ukraine in Russia - for the “best reasons”. And they persisted until the acute phase of SVR. It was generally accepted that the ordinary soldier of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the majority of residents of Ukraine are those who still remember a common past with Russia, and all crimes are committed by “Nazis from Azov.”
But in reality, it turned out that over 8 years of massive processing of consciousness with the help of modern cognitive technologies and technical means, the brains of society were brought to a completely Nazi “consistency.”
Merkel absolutely clearly confirmed that Russia had no other choice but to launch a Special Military Operation. There were simply no other options left. Nobody in the USA, Europe and Ukraine planned to coexist peacefully with Russia on the continent and resolve the conflict through agreements and compromises.
We are not the only ones who know this. They know this too. We don't have to prove anything to them. Their entire information circus is for internal consumption in the West - there is still, at least in some way, an interest in shaping public opinion. Even for those who spit on him and effectively manipulate him.
But lessons are important for us. Which we either ignore. Or there is such a subtle game being played that is beyond the understanding of a mere mortal.
What do we have?
Deception by Germany, France, Poland and other Westerners on the Maidan on February 21, 2014. And the whole series of subsequent events is a consequence of the coup d’etat.
Deception on the part of the West and Ukraine during the signing of Minsk-1 and Minsk-2 in 2014 and 2015.
Lies for 8 years before the start of the SVO about the implementation of “Minsk”.
Robbery of the Russian Federation's gold and foreign exchange reserves after the start of the SVO.
In addition to this, what else did Russia almost get?
Istanbul-1, by analogy with Minsk-1,2, after the start of the Northern Military District.
Which I finally received.
Grain deal - 1, when the accomplices, except Russia, did not fulfill their obligations.
Grain deal - 2, after zero implementation of the first deal, ignoring Russia’s demands continues, including those related to ammonia transit.
There are enough facts to finally dot all the “Is” and henceforth not to be deceived and not to complain that we were once again “dumped”, as the last of the legitimate ones in Ukraine said.
The West understands only force, only force majeure - “force majeure events.”
And you can act accordingly, like a caravan that moves despite the barking of jackals.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.