A month after the Boeing crash: The American-Ukrainian version fell apart
After the hysteria of the Western media, they, as if by agreement, took water into their mouths and did not raise the topic of the Boeing that crashed in Donbass. In an information and sabotage war, the main thing in the struggle for mass consciousness is to be the first to speak up. That’s why most of the English press immediately after the fall came out with headlines about “damned Putin” who personally shot down the plane. What about the evidence? Evidence is not needed - you need to have time to declare, label, so that a vague imprint of something bad and dark remains in your head. I am sure that if you interview Londoners now, most of them will not remember what kind of plane it was, where it flew, how it fell, but they will be absolutely sure that Russia is to blame.
But in fact, a month has passed, and there is not even preliminary data, preliminary analyses, although all the black boxes were handed over to Malaysian experts. The recorders are being examined in London, the most anti-Russian side in this conflict.
A preliminary report on the investigation into the crash of a Malaysian Boeing 777 in Ukraine will be ready in late August – early September. Important in the final decision will be the analysis of the Dutch Safety Board. Holland is a country that can impartially assess the crash, especially because the largest number of people killed in it were Dutch citizens, and because the Netherlands can be independent if they want. Its promulgation will take place in the UN Security Council by the end of August.
However, based on the first results of the analysis of the flight recorders, it is possible to answer whether the plane was shot down by a Buk missile, or by an artillery/missile strike from planes observed next to it at the time of the tragedy. The fact is that when hit by a Buk missile or its numerous fragments, all life support systems of the aircraft stop functioning instantly, in an instant. If an aircraft is hit by shells from an attack aircraft or fighter, or by its missile, a number of several systems will fail, but almost never all at once. The plane crashes, while continuing its residual functions. English, Malaysian, Dutch specialists cannot but know this.
The Russian Ministry of Defense worked very accurately and at the highest professional level, promptly providing all available documentary data and information from radars on the movement of aircraft in the area of the tragedy. It was there that confirmation of the presence of a military aircraft crash in the square appeared. Neither the Americans nor the British provided even something closely resembling the data of the Russian Ministry of Defense. This played a role, and the media slowly began to fall silent.
Already now, primarily in the Malaysian press, there are reports that Russia is in no way involved in what happened. Malaysians are surprised by Western bias. After all, John Kerry himself made statements that Moscow trained the rebels to use the Buk. They provided doctored photos with a changed date, and after a refutation they were forced to admit that they did not have accurate information about who shot down the plane.
Meanwhile, American investigative journalist Robert Perry claims that US intelligence analysts do not rule out the involvement of Ukrainian armed forces in the attack. The Malaysians cite forensic experts who believe that the holes in the fuselage are similar to shells from an aircraft cannon, and cite the opinion of Michael Bokuriv, an OSCE observer of Ukrainian-Canadian origin, who claims that the fuselage is riddled with machine gun fire. This is confirmed by German journalists. They are echoed by retired Lufthansa pilot Peter Gaisenko, who accurately noted that a missile fired from the ground could not leave holes in both sides.
In Ukraine itself, a media campaign is being launched to accuse Kolomoisky of complicity in the Boeing crash, because it was his dispatchers in Dnepropetrovsk who brought the plane into the combat zone. Whether the evil oligarch is guilty or innocent is impossible to say, but his opponents within the country will not miss to dirty him up once again. And there is a reason...
Be that as it may, the West is retreating in the information battle for Boeing, despite the first successes. In August, a whole battle will unfold in the UN Council over the interpretation of the results of the analysis of the crash. After all, it’s one thing to analyze, and another to gain the right to interpret the research results, and, therefore, the right to potentially accuse. Indeed, more than once in the history of Russia, the result of won wars was crossed out by the special participation of England in the signing of the final peace document.
To lose the interpretation of results that are likely to be deliberately vague means to lose another battle in the information war. There is no need to do this, because if England and the United States had at least some evidence in favor of accusing Russia, the whole world would be watching them around the clock on the screens of all possible monitors.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.