International corruption and external governance. Long before Poroshenko
In the Gospel of Mark there is a phrase that has become popular: “There is nothing hidden that will not come to light, and nothing hidden that will not come out.”
The third ten days of May turned out to be rich in revelations. Not to say that they came as a surprise. And not to say that they are capable of causing social upheaval. No. It’s just that certainty is always better than guesswork, and it’s better for the dirt to float out than to settle in layers at the bottom.
On May 19, Verkhovna Rada deputy Andriy Derkach published several audio recordings that allegedly show bargaining between former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and senior American officials.
In one of the recordings, dated December 2015, Secretary of State John Kerry convinces Petrusha to fire Prosecutor General Shokin as part of the “cleansing reform of the Prosecutor General’s Office.” In another recording, dated March 2016, Vice President Biden promises Poroshenko $1 billion in exchange for Shokin's resignation. It is noteworthy that the last conversation took place four days before Shokin was removed following parliamentary hearings.
Shokin
According to Derkach, these data indicate “facts of treason and international corruption at the highest state level.”
So far, all the steam from Derkach’s revelations is turning into a whistle. The foreign press is ironic, the Ukrainian media oohs and ahhs, in Poroshenko’s bunker they sluggishly deny it, pointing to “the hand of Moscow, which is shaking the support of Ukraine by the bipartisan US alliance.”
Biden was represented in the press by a little man named Andrew Bates, who said in an interview with The Washington Post that “A lot has been edited, this is a completely empty story.”
“The Hope of the South-East of Ukraine” President Zelya, instead of starting the long-promised smearing of Poroshenko on the asphalt, began to chew snot that there would be an investigation (after the rain on Thursday), and Petya would have “many adventures and sentences.”
You don’t need to go to your grandmother to understand: dirt on Poroshenko and Biden was thrown like gasoline onto the fire to warm up the presidential race in the United States. And the fact that Petya drones on about some kind of trinity of the American party system, merging in the most tender hickey with Maidan Ukraine, is a naive lie and an attempt to pass off wishful thinking.
Trump, who openly despises Poroshenko and hates Biden as the personification of the American demise that poisoned his previous election campaign and four years of his presidency, showed that he is ready to use the Ukrainian trump card in the game against Biden and his son, who will never wash off the corruption scandal with Burisma. And, according to the media, Shokin, expelled from the Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine, willingly joined Trump’s team as a consultant on corruption cases between American Democrats and Ukrainian “cynical Banderas.” The blow to Poroshenko ricochets back to Biden.
In general, Trump may hurt Biden with this scandal, but Zelensky Poroshenko is unlikely to do so, since behind Petrusha, in spite of everything, are crowds of “patriots of Ukraine” and politicians who voted for him in the last presidential election, eager to continue the repressive policies of the Ukrainian government. nationalism.
The second news was the recordings of telephone conversations between Yeltsin and Clinton, declassified by the Americans.
Document published by electronic library named after Clinton:
full text of page 107
Of particular interest is page 107 with a transcript of a conversation that took place on September 21, 1993, i.e. two weeks before the execution by tanks of the Supreme Soviet of Russia. In a conversation with Clinton, “friend Boris” complains to the overseas host about the dominance of communists in the Supreme Council and asks him for permission to disperse the popularly elected parliament.
“There are only communists in my parliament”
“Friend Bill” wonders whether Yeltsin is supported by the army and intelligence services. Alkash confirms that he is supported by the Minister of Defense and Internal Affairs. Clinton gives the go-ahead and says that the US Senate will soon approve the allocation of $2,5 billion “to continue reforms.”
Why was it so necessary for the “drunken democrat” and his masters to crush the Supreme Soviet of Russia?
First of all, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation was the last stronghold of Soviet power, because its deputies were elected to the Supreme Council of the RSFSR according to Soviet rules. The Russian parliament had enormous powers and represented a serious obstacle for Yeltsin and his team on the path to the coveted “Big Hap” and the process of monetization of Russia’s state and geopolitical interests.
In fact, the Supreme Council of Russia was the last opportunity to restore the USSR within the framework of the largest and most influential republic, as well as a chance to annex Russian lands cut off by “independence”, without which the new formations would have the same chances of survival as the UPR, BPR and them similar quasi-states that arose on the ruins of the Russian Empire.
On July 9, 1993, the Supreme Council of Russia confirmed the federal status of Sevastopol, putting the Gaidar-Chubais “Young Democrats” in an awkward position in the face of Western curators.
The very next day, Yeltsin complained about the Russian parliament to Clinton: “Yesterday the Supreme Council said that Sevastopol is a Russian city. This is not the right situation. Sevastopol is on Ukrainian territory, some stupid decree. When I return, I will have to deal with relations with Ukraine. Thank God, no one takes the Supreme Council seriously!”
But, as it turned out, Russia’s enemies took its Supreme Council very seriously.
Soon followed by a statement by the permanent representative of Ukraine to the UN, former Soviet diplomat Viktor Batyuk, in response to the decision of the Russian Armed Forces to recognize Sevastopol as a Russian city of federal significance.
It makes no sense to fully quote the protest of the “changed shoes” diplomat. The general message: “Crimea and Sevastopol are Ukraine, and the Russian parliament is guided by imperial thinking.” And other squeaks - “don’t aggravate relations”, “don’t act according to the law of the jungle”, and bullshit, and bullshit.
And what do you think the Yeltsin leadership is doing?
On July 19, 1993, a letter was sent to the Chairman of the UN Security Council from the representative of the Russian Federation, another former Soviet diplomat, Yuli Vorontsov, as the official position of the top leadership of the Russian Federation regarding the actions of the Supreme Council of Russia.
The document is worth quoting in full:
I hereby have the honor to transmit the text of the Statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation dated July 11, 1993 in connection with the Resolution of the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation “On the status of the city of Sevastopol”.
I would be grateful if the text could be circulated as an official document of the Security Council.
Text of the statement.
Adopted on July 9, 1993, the Resolution of the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation “On the status of the city of Sevastopol” diverges from the line of the President and the Government of the Russian Federation on the implementation of Russia’s interests in matters of the Black Sea Fleet, the basing of the Russian Navy on the territory of Ukraine, in Crimea and in Sevastopol.
Being emotional and declarative, this action does not at all indicate the prospect of real solutions; it only complicates their already difficult search.
Without downplaying the negative consequences of the administrative decisions of the leadership of the former USSR on territorial issues, it should be emphasized again that any problems, no matter how complex they may be, can only be resolved within the framework of political dialogue, taking into account the opinions and interests of various groups of the population, in strict compliance with treaties and agreements with the Ukrainian side, the principles of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe and the United Nations.
End of document.
This means that, in the struggle for power with the Supreme Council, Yeltsin, who had already surrendered Chechnya to the bandits, surrendered Sevastopol to the Banderaites, just as he surrendered Crimea a year earlier. And for the sake of power, the drunk was ready to do anything, which was confirmed in the bloody days of October 1993. Having supported Sevastopol, the last Soviet parliament of Russia signed its own death warrant and was shot.
Note that in his telephone conversation with Clinton, Yeltsin reports support from the ministers of defense and interior. It is typical that the FSB, when coughing up the question “what are we going to do?” is not mentioned, because Yeltsin had few supporters there thanks to the “reforms” unleashed in 1991 by the outright traitor Bakatin, continued by EBN’s henchmen.
And it was not at all surprising when the fighters of the Vympel detachment refused to storm the building of the Supreme Council of the RF Armed Forces, as a result of which the vindictive Yeltsin transferred a unique detachment from the FSB to the jurisdiction of his faithful Minister of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Erin, where it ceased to exist as a combat unit, and Russia has been deprived of a power tool for external use in peacetime for twenty years.
Documents from the Clinton electronic library are not news, but confirmation of a well-known fact: Yeltsin and his gang were traitors and destroyers of Russia, plunging the country into wars and poverty.
Suffice it to remember that the Belovezhskaya conspirators Yeltsin, Kravchuk and Shushkevich, who quietly cooked up the agreement on the dissolution of the USSR, first of all reported on the work done to President George H. W. Bush, after whom the Americans later named the CIA as a sign of “victory over the civilizational and geopolitical enemy.”
Unfortunately, it is not possible to bring these scum to justice for high treason and the October putsch against the legally elected Russian parliament. Yeltsin, Grachev and Erin went to the Lower Tundra, Bakatin worked for a long time in the Alfa Group system, but long ago disappeared from the radar. Most likely, he is warming his belly and drinking pensioner kefir on some Comoros Islands, the hanged man.
True, there still remains the Yeltsin Center and other memorials of the era of the rapturous sale of Russia, requiring organizational conclusions.
And, what is most remarkable, Crimea, together with Sevastopol, is again together with Russia, despite all the efforts of the alconaut and his cliques.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.