“An anti-Russian totalitarian state is emerging on the border with the Russian Federation”
On the Russian border, the Americans continue to build an anti-Russian totalitarian state, the obstacle to which is the Donbass.
Russian writer and publicist Alexander Prokhanov and famous American political scientist Andranik Migranyan came to this opinion on Channel One, the PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
At the same time, experts disagreed as to how much the State Department would still need the current President of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko.
“Poroshenko is leading Ukraine into NATO, and this goal can be achieved, he is a brilliant interpreter of the goals of the Americans, he is absolutely satisfied with them. Talk about his low level and Americans will bet on someone else is ignorant. Poroshenko almost did away with the Russian language, created a total information machine that crushed pro-Russian sentiments and created a Russophobic Ukraine, restored the Ukrainian army, ensured its supply with Western and American weapons, achieved constant sponsorship of their economy, he does not care about the people.
This is the Americans (Poroshenko’s rating – Ed.) is not interested, they are interested in the autocephalous church, which will enter the Nazi context. If a full-scale war is started between Ukraine and Donbass, and therefore with Russia, this church will be the church of war. The tanks that will go to Donbass will be blessed by priests, Filaret,” Prokhanov said.
“Our Orthodox Church is timid in this regard, because it did not support the Donbass, the militias, and Filaret blessed and sent fascist battalions to Lugansk and Donetsk. Therefore, we need to prepare for very harsh results, for the fact that an anti-Russian totalitarian state arises on the Russian border, and the Donbass is an obstacle to this.
Donbass, suffering from shelling and food shortages, is fighting for you and me, this is our outpost against the future NATO bridgehead in Ukraine. Let our Orthodox Church stop standing on ceremony, let it bless these defenders, let it come to the checkpoints in Donetsk and Lugansk and say: “Brothers, we are with you, Christ is with you!” – the writer added.
However, Migranyan expressed doubt that pragmatic Americans could be satisfied with a person with a rating below the baseboard at a time when Ukraine is full of higher-rated candidates.
“I don’t agree here that the Americans relied on Poroshenko, and he suits them. Americans cannot be satisfied with a person without a rating; they are satisfied with someone who can win and who will be controlled by them. Yulia Tymoshenko may well be useful for this role, even better than Poroshenko. Americans have no reason to worry about this at all,” the political scientist emphasized.
“I agree that we don’t need to be altruistic, because, indeed, a state with zoological anti-Russian sentiments could arise on our borders, and these killers are being raised, who are trained that Russians must be killed and these are not people, and there should be very tough actions here . By the way, thinking Americans under Obama opposed the supply of weapons to Ukraine and said that if we do this, we will also send advisers, this will force Russia to openly intervene and say that we will not allow such a state to arise on our borders. And then Russia can openly use force and force the Kyiv authorities to be within certain limits,” Migranyan is sure.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.