Ukrainians laid claim to the Yalta Film Studio
Moscow - Simferopol, February 27 (PolitNavigator, Mikhail Stamm) - Following the owner of PJSC Yalta Film Studio Sergei Arshinov, who successfully challenged the nationalization of his property, the Ukrainian company Rozbudova-grad LLC went to court with similar claims. But it is unlikely that the Russian court will meet the Ukrainians halfway, they write "News".
Subscribe to the news "PolitNavigator - Crimea" в Facebook, Classmates or In contact with
Following the owner of PJSC Yalta Film Studio Sergei Arshinov, who successfully challenged the nationalization of his property, the Ukrainian company Rozbudova-grad LLC went to court with similar claims. The plaintiffs demand that the resolution of the State Council of Crimea dated October 9, 2014, which returned the company’s territory to state ownership, be partially declared invalid, as well as the decree of the Council of Ministers dated October 28, which assigned the real estate plot to the State Unitary Enterprise of the Republic of Kazakhstan “Yalta-Film,” to be cancelled.
The statement of claim in the first case was accepted for proceedings by the Arbitration Court of the Republic on January 22, in the second - on February 17.
The newspaper recalls that the Council of Ministers of Crimea approved a resolution on the purchase of the Yalta film studio into republican ownership for 1,3 million hryvnia (approximately 3,7 million rubles at the current exchange rate). On September 10, the State Council of Crimea canceled the 15-year-old decision to corporatize and sell a controlling stake in the Yalta Film Studio, thereby returning the territory and objects at the address: st. Mukhina, 3. The main owner of the studio, Sergei Arshinov, challenged the actions of the authorities in court and on February 3 won a lawsuit against the State Council.
However, the claim won by Arshinov does not mean that Rozbudova-grad LLC (it owned the plot and facilities at the address: Sevastopolskaya St., 4) will face a similar outcome, the newspaper writes.
“We do not have case law, and a court decision, even in a similar case, is not obligatory for making a different decision,” Sergei Zhorin, chairman of the presidium of the Moscow Bar Association, told Izvestia. “It can be just the opposite; there are quite a lot of such examples in our courts.” The judge will be guided by the rules of the law, the circumstances of the case, and also, most importantly, by internal conviction,” the lawyer emphasized.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.