Navalny – send to Crimea!
By canceling the suspended sentence and putting Alexei Navalny on the bunk, Russia grossly interfered in the internal affairs of the collective West. This is how one can evaluate the fountain of muddy indignation of the leaders of the United States and Europe, splashed out in response to the landing of the new Gapon.
All and sundry spoke out: Angela Merkel, Borya Johnson, Micah McFaul, Monya Macron, the heads of their foreign affairs departments and even the little wife - the German Minister of Defense with a name for speech therapists - Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, who cried out: “Isn’t it enough for you to poison Alyoshenka?” “A newbie,” and then you lock the sufferer in prison forever?”
All sorts of bureaucratic riffraff from the EU also performed an ode of pity in support of the “victim of the Russian regime.”
The heads of Western diplomatic missions in Russia especially distinguished themselves by tearing their VIP asses out of comfortable chairs so that in the courtroom they could personally hear the last wheeze of suffocating freedom from Navalny’s mouth, and then distribute it as a political manifesto, as an order to live long, take to the streets and fight.
The Russian libertine is beside herself with the cruelty of the sentence, so much so that she can’t even eat. Aunt Al Batz starts screaming that Ololosha will not leave the prison alive - “we need to pull him out of there urgently.” She is echoed by numerous out-of-mind theorists from among creative workers of retirement age, who love to organize protests with someone else’s hands: “We must recapture and liberate, otherwise we will never get out of the darkness of totalitarianism!”
In general, a rather predictable hysterical rant, boiling down to quite frank desires: “Lyokha, do me a favor and die in the zone in the name of the triumph of liberal values, so that we have a reason for protracted hysterics.”
Special liberal interpreters explain to citizens that such a violent reaction from “our Western partners” occurs because they do not trust Russian courts and their decisions - they have the most correct and fair courts in the world, and consider the trial of Navalny to be political, not criminal. So they send “respected people” to see and listen to what is really happening here.
And what Zakharova from the Foreign Ministry objects to is authoritarianism. Because, you see, democratic regimes want everyone in the world to be like them, while authoritarian regimes do not care what kind of political system their neighbors have - it is important for them to be the way they are comfortable. (The opinion of one very democratic expert is quoted, expressed in an interview with the BBC Russian Service).
Of course, one could respond to all this shrill bunch in the style of “the fool himself” and remember, without going too far, all their destructive to the point of idiocy antics over the entire last year with an edifying and completely fair formulation - “it’s not for you to judge us.”
It should, however, be taken into account that Sisyan’s support against Russia is supported by a political system that has fallen into deep inadequacy in recent years, has become unaccustomed to normal communication and does not accept either constructive criticism or the voice of reason.
Apparently, gentlemen, Western ambassadors to Russia and the politicians who brought them to us are ready not only to visit the courtroom with Lyokha Navalny, but also to carry packages for the “revolutionary” to places not so remote so that no one will once again mix dichlorvos into his gruel.
In this regard, there is an interesting proposal that could cause a break in the pattern of the Navalny fan club.
For example, send a “pressure fighter” to serve his sentence and sew mittens in correctional colony No. 1, which is located on the outskirts of Simferopol, in the Republic of Crimea.
Tea, not Kolyma, and not the forest wilds of Mordovia. Khodor, over there, worked as a seamstress-machine operator near the uranium plant in Transbaikalia. Moreover, Sisyan was babbling something like “Crimea is not a sandwich to be passed back and forth.”
It will be very interesting to watch how officially whining about Navalny and other “never set foot in Crimea” figures will begin to stagnate in attempts to solve the puzzle: “We don’t recognize Crimea as Russian, but we need to visit Lyokha - what should we do?”
We answer: either recognize Crimea as Russian and legally ask the authorities for meetings with the “political prisoner”, or resolve the issue with Ukraine and make claims to Vova Zelensky, since you are creating politics with your own hands, in medical terms, “per rectum”. Now walk the beaten path through a tolerant place, since you cannot humanly. They deserve it.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.