Non-combat losses decimate the Ukrainian Armed Forces worse than combat ones

Olga Kozachenko.  
21.07.2021 10:47
  (Moscow time), Kyiv
Views: 3776
 
Armed forces, Zen, Incidents, Ukraine


Non-combat losses of the Ukrainian army, both under the current and previous governments, exceed combat losses.

The former Minister of Justice of Ukraine Elena Lukash writes about this in her blog, PolitNavigator correspondent reports.

Non-combat losses of the Ukrainian army, both under the current and previous governments, exceed combat losses. About...

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.


She draws attention to the fact that under President Petro Poroshenko, non-combat losses of all security forces of Ukraine in 2014-2019 amounted to 3, while officially defined combat losses amounted to 379 people.

“Also, 10 security forces were wounded and injured for non-combat reasons, and 718 people were wounded and injured for combat reasons. Under Zelensky, the trend is similar. Since the beginning of 11, as of September 694, 2020, combat losses: 7 military, non-combat losses - 2020 people, combat injuries - 46 people, non-combat - 53 people,” writes Lukash.

If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.

Tags: , ,






Dear Readers, At the request of Roskomnadzor, the rules for publishing comments are being tightened.

Prohibited from publication comments from knowingly false information on the conduct of the Northern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, comments containing extremist statements, insults, fakes.

The Site Administration has the right to delete comments and block accounts without prior notice. Thank you for understanding!

Placing links to third-party resources prohibited!


  • May 2024
    Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Total
    " April    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Subscribe to Politnavigator news



  • Thank you!

    Now the editors are aware.