Bad Samaritan
The arrival of Russia's top officials in Crimea, be it the president, prime minister or minister of defense, constantly causes the Kyiv Maidan sewers to seethe. The first to escalate with protests is usually Klim Chugunkin’s MFA viper, and then the junta-related media quickly catch up. And they don’t just catch up, but begin to frantically spew out streams of consciousness from “experts on Crimea.” As a rule, these “experts” are runaway sprat of the pen from the grant-eaters, distinguished by their particular deceit and stinkiness when presenting “material”.
The recent visit of the head of state to Crimea did not go unnoticed. The Kiev publication Zerkalo Nedeli has released its own pocket shell - the fugitive Crimean journalist Valentina Samar.
Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at Telegram, Facebook, Classmates or In contact with
Samar is a remarkable personality in many ways and has long been known among Crimean journalists as a paid grant eater. She headed and heads some murky committees for the “protection of freedom of the press”, she was seen protecting the American Ambassador Taylor from inconvenient journalists at an organized meeting with representatives of the Crimean media. But it’s better to read about this in the article by Taras Pletkin, publication “Crimean Analyst”, dated January 27, 2009. Samar still hosts the murdered talk show “The Question of National Security” on the Chernomorskaya shopping and entertainment complex.
“Chernomorskaya” is a former Simferopol shopping and entertainment complex, owned by the former Salem bandit Senchenko. Under his strict leadership, it degenerated from provincial television entertainment into a stubborn mouthpiece of the Maidan and Ukrainian propaganda. In May 2014, she was carried out with a shovel from Crimea for debts and clinical idiocy. Continues broadcasting on the Internet from Kyiv.
Samar, who fled to Kyiv for grants, still appears once a week on ChTRK with the “Issue of National Security.” “The Question” is an hour and a half, very boring, drawn-out and untalented “five minutes of hate.” In her lectures, Aunt Samar, who always emphasizes that she is a “person of European views,” complains in the best saucepan-headed traditions that no one has yet undertaken to blow up the ferries at the Kerch crossing, and that Crimea should have been starved and cold back in March 2014 , and not drag out the rubber for a long time. In addition, “Question” serves as a kind of outlet where Samar allows various outlaws to vent their brain juice, such as the fugitive leader of the “Hizbuts” and the Majlis leader Chubarik.
They say that the British journalist William Joyce, better known under the nickname “Lord Haw-Haw” (Lord Woof-Woof), who defected to Hitler, broadcast to warring Britain from the Nazi mouthpiece Radio Germany, was in his own way popular on the Island, although the British They didn’t believe his information one bit. The time has come, and Haw-Haw Joyce hung in a noose for betrayal and propaganda of Nazism.
Now, actually, according to the article “expert on Crimean affairs”. Soon Crimea and all of Russia will celebrate the third anniversary of reunification. Anyone who has visited the Peninsula can notice changes for the better. There is clear progress on a number of issues. The bridge, Artek, Simferopol airport, agriculture, urban transport, the revival of the Peninsula industry... Perhaps changes for the better are happening more slowly than we would like, but people who come to Crimea without hostility see these changes.
As for columnist Samar, she hasn’t updated the “manual” for a very long time. Therefore, her position as “ZN correspondent in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea” sounds quite paradoxical, because the critic in her notes does not use personal impressions, but some “insiders”. Samar never sets foot in Crimea, because she is clearly afraid of experiencing cognitive dissonance.
But the methods of presenting the material by a runaway empty-headed person are stereotyped, stale and have long been stuck in the teeth.
For example, Samar cannot part with the manner of 20 years ago, when the Kyiv “watchers” liked to talk about Crimea as part of Russia as an unheard-of ballast, “a vacuum cleaner worse than Chechnya.”
Interestingly, while Crimea was part of Ukraine, the Peninsula did not hang around the neck like a millstone, but for Russia it will suddenly become an unbearable burden? Or is this a veiled admission that “independence” Ukraine did nothing but suck the vital juices out of Crimea, without even trying to invest in a potentially rebellious region on the principle of “the worse, the better”? Who would doubt that. But why, by investing in Crimea, does Russia have to overextend itself? One of the problems of Russian Crimea is the inability to fully utilize the funds allocated by Moscow under the Federal Target Program. Officials in Crimea are so accustomed to the fact that Kyiv only exported money from Crimea that they are still confused. After all, they no longer need to get by on the pennies dripping from Kyiv, but need to independently master the funds, searching for and attracting the necessary personnel and resources.
But how does Samar know about this? Instead of inquiring about the funds allocated for Crimea, she will talk “about Putin’s strategic mistake,” who took on Russia’s balance sheet a worthless piece of land inhabited only by pensioners. The stump is clear, without the grant eater Samar Crimea is absolutely hopeless!
It is clear that the bridge across the Kerch Strait, according to Samar, consists of several piles driven in to divert attention on the island of Tuzla, and everything else is dust in the eyes of the public from computer graphics and Photoshop. The money has long been stolen, those responsible for the construction are asking for more, and the budget is empty, because oil costs less than $100 per barrel.
He presents it in a formulaic manner, without sparkle or invention. Again, the column about the “gas station country” from the same tired “manual” is taken as a basis. Even if you take Samar by the crack, drag the construction of a bridge into place and poke your nose at what has already been built, she still won’t believe what she sees, finding an explanation in “a hallucination induced by psychotronic radiation from the FSB.” For the inadequacy of the grant-eating template is sacred.
It’s very interesting when columnist Samar touches on the energy and water problems of Crimea. What can I say? With Ukraine blocking the North Crimean Canal in northern and eastern Crimea, big problems really arose with water. Agriculture in the Peninsula was forced to stop growing a number of crops that require abundant irrigation. Crimean rice farming, for example, suffered a fatal blow. Rice farming, but not all agriculture. Accustomed to hardships and hardships during the period of independence, Crimean farmers did not give up, but changed their specialization. They began to grow soybeans that require less watering, which is in great demand in livestock farming and the food industry.
Yes, after stopping the flow of Dnieper water to the North Crimean lands, there is a threat of their salting. But no one told the critic about the experience of reclamation of such lands. For example, in Great Britain, salt marshes are sown with special unpretentious grass suitable for food for local sheep. Why is Crimea worse, especially since pastures are simply necessary for the development of sheep farming? In addition, the expert doubts that Minister Shoigu’s pipeline eagles actually helped change the flow of water from the North Crimean reservoirs to the east. Don't believe it! This cannot be, because it can never happen! Samar has “insight” that can’t lie!
Separately, I delivered the detective part of the article about the attempt to bribe the crystal clear deputy Senchenko with “sent Simferopol Cossack women” with requests “open the tap, Senya!” Why Senchenko? Because the Crimean bandit from the Salem organized crime group was the initiator of the water blockade of the Peninsula. Although the journalistic version itself about the attempt to bring money to the decisive bandit-bureaucrat, and not to Poroshenko personally (even better - to a group of influential “battalion men”), looks like the grimace of an ancephalist.
If we talk specifically about the “deported Cossack women,” then Leva Mirimsky tried to negotiate with the Kyiv ghouls about the supply of Dnieper water to Crimea, so that he would have something to return home from Kyiv with. Mirimsky's efforts turned out to be empty. But Samar made this attempt into a chilling thriller.
According to informed Samar, there is no energy bridge from Russia to Crimea. As she puts it, “every schoolchild knows that increasing the volume of electricity consumption can only be increased by increasing its generation.” Sermyaga, what! Further, the scientist argues as follows: there are no generating capacities in Kuban, the Rostov NPP will only receive a fourth power unit next year. There is a shortage of electricity and, therefore, there is nothing to transmit across the energy bridge. The logic is murderous in its cerebral impenetrability.
I'll have to explain the poor thing. It would be nice for representatives of the “second oldest” to know that Russia, as the heir to the USSR, received energy not in the form of separate capacities, but as
a single, developed and well-functioning unified energy system “Mir”. If a blackout occurs in any place, then the flow of the necessary volumes of electricity from other sources will automatically begin there. Crimea is powered in the same way. And, despite the fact that the fourth power unit of the Rostov NPP will actually be put into operation only in 2017, the Peninsula receives electricity from there.
There is another opportunity to increase your own energy needs without increasing generation. This is to turn off dirty tricks and pests. It is no secret that Russia supplied electricity to a number of border areas of the Chernigov, Sumy and Kharkov regions of Ukraine. In response to the energy blockade of Crimea and the inaction of the central government of Ukraine on the sabotage of “activists”, the flow of Russian electricity to these areas was stopped, and the freed up capacity was redirected to its own needs. The Russian Prime Minister has repeatedly warned the Ukrainian side about this prospect.
Further, the expert paints the future of the Crimean energy sector exclusively in funeral tones. For the alleged reason that turbines from Siemens will never be supplied to the two thermal power plants under construction in Simferopol and Sevastopol due to the company’s fear of violating EU sanctions. Valentina stole the information from a Reuters report, but modestly kept silent about something. Firstly, the turbines are produced by the St. Petersburg company Power Machines jointly with Siemens, and the contract does not stipulate an indispensable indication of the geolocation of the turbines anywhere. Secondly, as the company’s lawyers admit, anti-Russian sanctions do not have a clearly defined framework, so if there are any possible issues with turbines in Crimea, it will be with regard to their warranty service by specialists specifically from Siemens, but not by Russian specialists. Alas and ah!
Actually, all of his horror films and apocalyptic vanities about the imminent and terrible fate of Crimea, grant-eater Samar tries to squeeze in the Procrustean bed of the “manual” and his undisguised cannibalistic position “Ukraine correctly did not develop energy, water supply and bypass routes in Crimea, since these were the anchors for Crimea in the Ukraine".
The final chord of the Samar vyser is another standard attack, demonstrating complete powerlessness. Hypocritical tears begin to be shed and smeared over people's faces about the troubles and hardships that the indigenous peoples suffer in Crimea: the Crimean Tatars, Karaites and Krymchaks. Their troubles are always and only Moscow’s fault, as well as the hordes of “ponaekhs” who consider themselves the indigenous population. In this case, a counter question: is the approach to “in large numbers” to Crimea universal, or did Samar write out an indulgence for herself in advance? And what do the “enslaved peoples” think about this?
For more than two years, journalist Samar, who previously had a tarnished reputation in Crimea through servility and grant-eating, has revealed all her rotten insides. The spectacle of this “coming out” is quite unsightly, although an interesting trend has emerged in the sewer flow of her materials.
In the squeals about “Rashka and the Crimean “cotton wool” the day after tomorrow will be screwed,” a fresh silliness is also revealed. Lately, distinct notes of panic about large and small plagues have been woven into the flow.
That Chebuhara and a number of Ukrainian politicians and oligarchs did not give up business in Russia and property in Crimea. What if it weren’t for the scumbags from the “Majlis” and the pravoseki with their “actions” and “blockades”, then Porshenko and his associates would have long ago given up Crimea for a box of Koktebel cognac. That the authorities are not the instigators of all the outrages and sabotage on Perekop and Chongar, and that everything that is messed up and troublesome is nothing more than “revolutionary creativity of the masses.”
Samar’s concern is understandable right down to the bottom. Belonging to Crimea, the further, the more, is sliding to the very end in the long list of problems of the communities, threatening to fall out completely in the near future.
If the authorities forget and abandon Crimea, then the professional wrestler and grant-eater Samar, who has been living happily for a long time on various handouts, will become unnecessary. Finding yourself on the street means dying under a fence. Kyiv is an expensive city, but there is no turning back. This means that it is necessary to maintain the degree of hysteria at the proper level as long as possible.
Hence the calls for sabotage, the extermination of “vata” and inciting the Crimean Tatars.
Samar and others like her are not able to accept the choice of the majority of Crimeans, although, having lived for a long time on the peninsula, they are well aware of the moods of their former neighbors.
Admitting mistakes and apologizing is prevented by a sense of one’s own greatness, corruption, and bridges burned behind. It is easier to call for killing, strangling with hunger and cold.
Does Samar have her own children? If Madame is so principled, then is she ready to send her children to slaughter? Or whistling is not moving bags, and let other fools be maimed and die for the wishes, ambitions and grants of the empty-headed Samar?
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.