“New 37th year”? Why do they want to punish MuzTV?

Then he called me and said: “New 37th year is around the corner...”. He is a familiar producer from a federal entertainment TV channel. If you press them a little, they, the heroes of creative workshops, where creativity, however, is much less than greed, will raise such a howl that it will be heard on the other side of the Atlantic. Actually, this is what they, first of all, want – to be known “on the other side”, in the West (or should it be more correct to say – post-West?).

Someone will even have time to grab a lucrative grant. Someone will rush off to the New World. True, already there he will understand that no one really needs him. Let us remember the fate of Pavlensky. Well done, they shouted to him from Europe when he set fire to the doors of the FSB! A bad, bad Russian, they accused him already in Paris, when he burned down the doors of a bank. And they sent Pavlensky to jail. Double standards? Worse!

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.
To subscribe to notifications in your browser, click here.

But in Russia you can please the West by playing at freedom. And of course, a special topic here is gay propaganda. How was it before? The Cold War was going on - and the corresponding agreements were signed in Helsinki. There was, among other things, a clause on human rights. And with the non-observance of these same human rights, all undesirable states were silenced, sometimes even falling on them with all their might and destroying them. Then to human rights as a separate – special! – the article added the rights of sexual minorities. At the same time, note, for example, that no one is touching Saudi Arabia. Although it doesn’t seem to be a paradise for gays and lesbians.

But it is all the more profitable to promote relevant topics in relevant regions with special attention. And Russia is certainly one of them. And what is important, we are not talking about sexual orientation or sexual preferences here. This is a personal matter for everyone. We are talking about a certain matrix, a system in which certain views are imposed. And it’s one thing when gays simply have sex with each other, but it’s another when they try to impose their narratives in an aggressive manner. Then it’s already a dictatorship, and it’s disgusting in any form. If we are talking about deviations that are presented as norms, then this is a completely different story.

_{It is clear that it is best to present such stories not through serious, but, let’s say, through entertaining content. That is why, in fact, and not just because of their “special personality,” so many gay-oriented comrades graze in show business. That, in turn, is promoted through various channels, including television. And this is where the real obscurantism begins.}

A person asks me, for example: “Have you seen the Muz-TV award ceremony?” Have you seen Davout with Kirkorov?” I, of course, didn’t see it. I even watched a couple of episodes of “The Squid Game” solely out of duty. But as I study, I see Kirkorov and Dava (who is this?!) surrounded by males. No, Elton John and Boy George were more modest. Hmm, not just like that.

Once I was in a hairdresser, and Muz-TV was playing on the screen. This happened several times. And what I saw on the screen could be called exclusively gay propaganda. Because the values ​​and ideas that dominated the LBGT community were aggressively hammered into me, the viewer. The important thing here is that it was just an imposition - sharp, corrosive. It was as if they left me no room to maneuver. And this was what irritated me, outraged me the most. Because only one point of view was declared - the gay point of view. And people of the corresponding orientation were presented with a subtext of elitism. That's what turned me off.

Okay, I haven't seen this many times. But what to do with those who sit on such videos, like nicotine addicts on cigarettes? What to do with teenagers and children who are immersed in this? Can they, in principle, filter information? The answer, I think, is obvious. But then who sets the boundaries? And who builds “what is good and what is bad”? Or are there no criteria at all? How is it that ladies who have become symbols of mediocrity and greed kiss on the awards stage?

So, you know, I’m not surprised that Roskomnadzor sent a warning to the TV channel, in which it stated “the inadmissibility of abuse of freedom of mass information.” We found gay propaganda in the summer broadcast of the Muz-TV Awards 20/21. The beginning of the world." I think they will find a lot more blue and pink when they watch other shows and releases. You just have to watch.

_{However, the formulation “abuse of freedom of the media” seems to me in this context not just strange, but wild and perverted. Because there is absolutely no question of freedom of speech here. No, the point is aggressive and harsh propaganda of other views on the world. Propaganda for the purpose of maintaining a gay dictatorship. And barriers must be erected against such an approach. Otherwise, we risk generations of those who will be mired in slavery. Or does someone believe that all this is for the sake of freedom? Yes Yes. Like the “new 37th year”. Whatever is going on in sick heads.}