Where do Ukrainian “cyborgs” come from?

Alexander Rostovtsev.  
26.01.2018 09:06
  (Moscow time), Kyiv
Views: 6848
 
Author column, History, Propaganda, Ukraine


On January 29, Svidomo necrophiles are preparing to celebrate the “Velychezna Peremoga” in the history of Square - the 100th anniversary of the accordion-epic battle of Kruty of three hundred Ukrainian Spartans who detained countless hordes of Bolsheviks who came directly from the Kremlin, as the official fragrant legend says.

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at Telegram, Facebook,  Classmates or In contact with


Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.


The XNUMXth anniversary is not a big deal for you. On this occasion, the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance of the degenerate Vyatrovich went out of his way and covered Kiev with sheets of social advertising, glorifying the act of “peer cyborgs,” as Svidomo agitprop now calls the flimsy detachment of Kyiv students, drawing historical parallels from the past to the present.

Interestingly, on the website of the Institute of National Memory the legend has been corrected. The number of “cyborgs” under Kruty is now determined to be 520 bayonets, and Muravyov’s “red heap” opposing them is 10 times more. Less than 10 years have passed since the Krut “cyborgs” were raised to the banner, when the sturgeon was cut down. Just a year ago, the number of red troops advancing on Kyiv was estimated depending on the crazyness of the “researcher” - from 50 thousand to 2 million. Now the order of numbers more or less corresponds to historical facts.

Only the assessment of events has not changed. The version of the battle near Kruty officially adopted in Nezalezhnaya reads: On January 29, 1918 (new style), a small military detachment of Kiev students delayed the advance of the Red Army to Kiev, thereby allowing representatives of the Central Rada to calmly evacuate and sign a separate peace with Germany and Austria, according to which The autonomous UPR received “independence” from Russia.

That is, once again the myth, generated a hundred years ago by the first ruler of the UPR, the bearded fake-thrower and intriguer Grushevsky, has been confirmed and re-written. The version that contradicts the facts about the attack on Kyiv by the Red Army, which, as is known, will be formed only in a month, has been left unchanged.

If we turn to archival materials, we can find out that in January 1918, UPR troops fought many other battles with Red Guard detachments - for Chuguev, Romodan, Sumy, Odessa and Yekaterinoslav. But for some reason, only the battle near Krutami was chosen as a “national bond.” Why?

The answer lies in the coolest squad. It consisted mainly of students and high school students from Galicians. And who else but the Galicians are considered the main passionaries who achieved the cherished Independence, acting as its hope and support?

In principle, there is nothing to choose from among the battles in which the UPR army participated. The result was the same: the independent army suffered defeat after defeat and escaped with a drape. Often everything ended without clashes - Ukrainian troops surrendered cities and towns just from hearing about the Reds’ offensive. The battle near Kruty was no better or worse than others, it was just that racially faithful Galicians took part in it, acting as the passionate “yeast” of Ukraine, its hope and support.

The inconvenient truth is that it was not their generous fellow Ukrainians who came out to fight the Red Ukrainian detachments, but the Konovalets Sichists who came to Kiev in 1917 from the other side of the collapsed front, subjects of Austria-Hungary, called up to the front from Lvov and other Western universities. These alien parasyuks and tyagniboks, who did not have the slightest idea about the historical and cultural tendencies of the people of Eastern Ukraine, formed the Student Kuren in defense of the Central Rada.

Simply put, it was a group of foreign radicals, warmed up by the rulers of the Central Rada, defending their selfish interests. There is no need to talk about any popular support for Sichev students. It is also known that, together with “senior partners” from the Konovalets sicheviks, they took part in suppressing the uprising of workers at the Kyiv Arsenal plant, as a result of which 400 people were shot or lowered under the Dnieper ice by punitive forces.

On top of that, recruitment to the Student Kuren was not voluntary. On January 18, 1918, Galician students from the Kyiv University of St. Vladimir and the “independent” Ukrainian People’s University convened a meeting for all students who considered themselves Ukrainians. Those gathered were automatically enrolled in Kuren, because “under the threat of boycott and expulsion from the Ukrainian student family, all Ukrainian students must join.”

In addition to Galician and Ukrainian students, students of two senior classes of the 2nd Ukrainian named after. Cyril and Methodius Brotherhood Gymnasium.

In total, the Student Kuren consisted of approximately 200 people, whose command was given to the front-line soldier Omelchenko, who was specially enrolled in the Ukrainian People's University. The first hundred of Kuren took part in the battle near Krutami. The second hundred remained in Kyiv and took part in urban battles. The Praetorians of the CR were equipped to the highest standard.

A participant in the battles near Krutami, student Igor Loskiy recalled: “You can imagine how grotesque the hundred looked. The typical look was like this: your own shoes, pants belted with a rope (there were no belts), a gymnasium or student jacket, or a civilian sleeveless jacket, and on top an overcoat without at least one flap... old rusty guns... While the Bolsheviks, who captured the premises a month later schools, found there full warehouses of brand new shoes, clothes, not to mention weapons and ammunition.”

Other sources add that the “Praetorians” were given torn trousers and even prisoner’s hats as headdresses by the loving authorities of the UPR, which resonates well with the homeless equipment of modern “cyborgs”, for whom the Maidan owner does not mind anything, including those purchased from some foreign flea market shoes with cardboard soles.

Sichevik students were given normal Russian rifles, while Sichevik high school students were blessed with rusty Austrian rifles, for each of which they somehow scraped together three clips. As many as five days from January 21 to January 26, 1918 were allocated for combat training of the “proto-cyborgs.”

Not only suicide bombers from among hundreds of Galician students and schoolchildren took part in the battle near Kruty. Together with them, the Kuren of the 1st Youth Military School named after B. Khmelnitsky, under the command of centurion Averky Goncharenko, took part in the battle. These are 250 - 300 trained officers and cadets. Among them, former soldiers of the Austrian army who were captured by Russians predominated.

The aforementioned centurion Goncharenko, by the way, a former career officer of the Russian army with the rank of captain, during the Great Patriotic War changed his shoes into the uniform of a Hauptsturmführer of the Waffen SS “Galicia” division. There is something disgustingly natural about this.

The Krut army was also reinforced by 40 captured deserters from the kuren of the “Free Cossacks” (there were about a hundred “free Cossacks” near Krut). Let's add here the artillery battery of centurion Loschenko (2 cannons and 30 artillerymen), 60 volunteers from the local Cossacks, plus 40 people from the commandant's platoon under the command of the station chief Kruta.

According to various sources, the motley “independent” army near Kruty reached 900 bayonets with 18 Maxim machine guns. The general leadership of the troops concentrated at the station was carried out by the head of the 1st military school, centurion F. Timchenko. His district defense headquarters was located in a train stationed at the station itself. A separate wagon with ammunition was attached to it.

The future SS Hauptsturmführer Goncharenko advanced his forces 2 km ahead of the station. The detachment stretched along the front for 3 kilometers and was separated by a railway embankment, and the flanks did not see each other, and the military geniuses did not think of grabbing field telephones. The cadet commander, centurion Goncharenko, divided the students into four platoons of 28–30 bayonets and assigned them the safer left flank. The youngest and those who did not know how to shoot were left in reserve. The Junkers were placed on the right flank. Communication between the flanks was carried out verbally, along a chain, which in the heat of battle guaranteed the effect of a “broken telephone.”

In general, as is traditionally the case with “independents,” the organization was raised to unattainable heights.

And all this army was attacked by Muravyov’s “red horde” of about 6 thousand fighters. It consists of: the Poltava column of Yegorov’s 1st Army of 1300 bayonets; Berzin's 2nd Army of approximately 3000 bayonets; a detachment of Kudinsky’s 3rd “army” of 800 bayonets. Directly during the battle, the 1st Petrograd consolidated detachment arrived from Aleksandrovsk (Zaporozhye) to help these troops.

In composition, this army, barely equivalent to half a full-blooded division, consisted of Ukrainian volunteers. It included Kharkov and Donetsk workers (the commander of the Donetsk people was Ukrainian D. Zhloba), red Cossacks under the command of a native of the Chernigov region Vitaly Primakov, a detachment of workers from Yekaterinoslav, front-line Ukrainians from among those who returned from the war with the Germans, a detachment of Black Sea sailors.

As Grushevsky’s closest ally in the UPR, Vinnychenko, wrote in his book “Rebirth of the Nation”: “The majority of the Bolshevik army was formed from our own warriors...”

However, if you think about it, the Reds advancing on Kyiv did not have the most suitable origin. Apart from the Red Cossacks of Primakov, the rest were natives of Donbass, Tavria and Novorossiya.

It is known that the machine gunners and artillerymen of the Sicheviks were the first to open fire on the Red vanguard. The advance detachment of the Reds suffered losses and retreated, requesting reinforcements. In total, the Reds made five attempts to attack, and the fifth was crowned with complete success, since the defenders ran out of ammunition, and the authorities sitting at the station in the carriage had drunk too much before the start of the battle, and fled as soon as they heard the shots.

The Red Guards, as the attacking side, suffered losses of 300 people. The defending Sicheviks lost 70–90 people. Most of the “warriors” fled, about 30 students were captured. Some of them were released, some ended up in the infirmary, some, as they say, were given the hot hand by the soldiers of Popov’s advanced red detachment, who were more unlucky than others.

According to the canonical legend, at Kruty “the entire flower of the Ukrainian student body perished,” which, of course, is a shameless lie.

The same student Loskiy remained alive and left notes about the battle near Kruty and the events preceding it, which are very different from the licked and syrup-drenched harem myths and legends.

And for a snack. One of the main questions that constantly arises when discussing the battle of Kruty can be formulated as follows: why, with the nominal size of the UPR army of 140 thousand bayonets, were students and schoolchildren used as a barrier?

 

Yes, because in just a year of “independence” the residents of the UPR were overwhelmingly disillusioned with the incompetent leadership, which consisted of impostors who relied on the interventionists’ bayonets and instilled aggressive Galicianism. At the time the CR declared complete “independence,” 10 thousand of Skoropadsky’s troops, tens of thousands of yesterday’s front-line soldiers who had returned home from the German war, Petlyura’s “Haydamak kosh,” and Konovalets’ Sich punitive forces were stationed in Kiev and its surroundings. Warehouses were bursting with weapons and ammunition. But there was no one to fight for the Central Republic and the UPR. There was only a group of students and schoolchildren, excited by the idea of ​​Svidomo, some of whom were recruited to fight under the threat of expulsion from the university.

If anything should be celebrated on December 29, it is the centenary of the Galician massacre of the workers of the Kyiv Arsenal plant, who rebelled against the puppet UPR, the hetman, the Petliurites, along with their puppet masters.

But loser states have their own loser heroes, who fit well into the idea of ​​tolerance and necrophilia professed at the state level.

If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.






Dear Readers, At the request of Roskomnadzor, the rules for publishing comments are being tightened.

Prohibited from publication comments from knowingly false information on the conduct of the Northern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, comments containing extremist statements, insults, fakes.

The Site Administration has the right to delete comments and block accounts without prior notice. Thank you for understanding!

Placing links to third-party resources prohibited!


  • May 2024
    Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Total
    " April    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Subscribe to Politnavigator news



  • Thank you!

    Now the editors are aware.