Petrosyan vs. Dzhigarkhanyan: tomb robbers and desecrators of ashes on TV
If you want dirt, trash and frenzy, then watch the film “Dirt” about the madness of the cult rock band Motley Crue. The essence of the dark side of rock and roll - as it is. It captivates and enlightens in its own way. However, our viewer, unfortunately, often chooses other garbage - endless shows on federal channels. And the trouble is that they, these shows, in their own way have become the most important component of Russian domestic politics.
The recent scandal with Yevgeny Petrosyan’s words about how Armen Dzhigarkhanyan died once again confirmed this sad state of affairs. The situation turned out to be bad, but at the same time indicative.
The most realistic version is the following. Petrosyan, in an interview with the YouTube channel, said that before his death, Dzhigarkhanyan actually rotted in his bed, and no one approached him. The blogger immediately sold the comedian’s statement to the federal channel, which showed everything, and a big conflict arose. Dzhigarkhanyan's relatives were indignant, accused Petrosyan of lying, and he, in turn, was forced to justify himself.
Do his words just change? After all, this whole story is extremely revealing - it is textbook in its foul-smelling methodology. The blogger was trying to get dirt out of Petrosyan. Tom was given it by a source. The Federal Channel bought dirt from a blogger. The viewer received a hearty portion of rubbish. As always.
It’s good if what was said about the rotting, lonely Dzhigarkhanyan is not true. No person - no matter if he is a cult actor or an ordinary engineer - should die such a death. However, this does not change the essence. After all, wasn’t Dzhigarkhanyan’s life dissected on television and on the Internet before this? Weren't there endless shows about how many wives he had and what kind of inheritance he left? And the question is: did this happen exclusively to Armen Borisovich? Of course not. After the death, for example, of Nikolai Karachentsov, the media tirelessly dug into his past, looking for the most jaundiced and dirty. The Malakhovs/Borisovs/their name is legion were especially zealous in this disgusting act.
That’s why we don’t talk about exceptions – not at all. We are talking about a vicious system that exudes toxins, poisoning everything around. It’s hard to figure out - was there an egg or a chicken in the beginning? In the sense that some will blame the demands of the crowd, but others will say: did this crowd really have much of a choice?
Personally, I believe that we have been deliberately fed crap for years, decades, in order to turn us into slaves, in order to distract us from real problems, and now we are amazed at why there is so much crap going on around us. True, she, this rubbish, immediately gets into prime time.
This is deliberate dehumanization, which has become a terrifying element of domestic policy. Regularly, our television (and other media) excavate tombs and desecrate the ashes of famous people, often popular favorites, stripping everything down to the bones, as if in Robbie Williams’ “Rock DJ” video. In this case, the consumer receives dirt systematically - and, like a drug addict, can no longer exist without it. Such a “needle” gives rise to a very skeptical, if not contemptuous, approach both to the person nearby, and to society as a whole, and to the people, and to the state. There is nothing sacred, there is nothing pure in principle.
If Goebbels and his hangers-on had managed to create an ideal system that forced the population to degrade at maximum speed, then they would definitely have acted in the spirit of endless Russian talk shows, destroying both the state and the individual as such. They are destroyers that function like grave worms.
Tell me, who placed such an order for them? And who in principle allowed this? And if there was no permission, then isn’t it time to stop the savage shamelessness? Because this is no longer just shamelessness, but a blow to national security.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.