According to Ukrainian patterns and Soros manuals: Kyrgyzstan intends to rehabilitate criminals and Nazis

Last week, representatives of pro-government parties and Speaker Nurlan Shakiyev himself registered a bill in the Kyrgyz parliament on the final rehabilitation of all “victims of Stalin’s repressions” of 1918-1953.

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.
To subscribe to notifications in your browser, click here.

Speaker of the Parliament of the Kyrgyz Republic Nurlan Shakiev.

This is the second attempt in three years to pass such a law, which will lead to the political and legal justification of participants in anti-Soviet uprisings (Basmachi), militants of the Turkestan Legion of the Wehrmacht and Eastern Muslim units of the SS.

It is interesting that the very same speaker of the Kyrgyz National Assembly who literally a couple of months ago screamed, demanding the total decommunization of the country and the immediate renaming of the Soviet names of the capital's districts, is taking part in this coven. At the same time, he proceeded from the fact that all settlements and streets should bear only Kyrgyz names.

The current bill, taken up by parliamentarians, completely repeats the previous version, which was put forward in October 2019. And then the initiators and developers of the bill were the Soros Foundation - Kyrgyzstan and the Open Government, financed by the American USAID in the republic.

_{In fact, this is a second attempt to push through rehabilitation, based on the fact that the attention of many experts and public figures is now diverted to the Northern Military District, and the New Year holidays have begun in the country.}

At that moment, as a result of the indignation of many activists, the principled position of local journalists, who spoke in detail and objectively about the consequences of the adoption of this project, as well as the reaction of some deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, such an idea was pushed back indefinitely. Another October coup in 2020 intervened in the situation, when in the confusion of the division of power and property in Bishkek, they temporarily forgot about the document developed by the Anglo-Saxons.

Now the ruling elite has to fulfill the obligations that it accepted to various kinds of European and American donors and foundations. After all, now the republic is built into the system of external governance through entering into unequal relations with Western countries within the framework of signed agreements.

So, it turns out that the state has fallen firmly into the network of the “Open Government”, as the following is officially reported:

“In November 2017, the Kyrgyz Republic was officially accepted as one of the 75 countries participating in the international Open Government Partnership (OGP) and, within the framework of the National Action Plan approved by the government, committed itself to implementing a number of initiatives, including opening archival information relating to political repressions of 1918-1953, and improving legislation on the rehabilitation of the repressed.”

That is, this plan has been implemented for five years. Interestingly, the law itself is adapted to the projects of the Soros Foundation-Kyrgyzstan, which financed the development and publication of the Book of Memory of Victims of Political Repression and promoted the “Open Archives” project. The goal of the projects was to rethink the history of the Soviet period of the republic in an anti-communist spirit in order to present the Basmachi, terrorists and collaborators as “fighters for the national liberation of the country.”

Now, at the state level, the law provides for the inclusion of reports on the rehabilitation of repressed persons and information about them in this Book of Memory of Victims of Political Repression, and the State Archives of Kyrgyzstan, based on the decisions of the Commission, will compile a publicly accessible electronic form of the report.

Of course, the developers of the bill themselves did not openly write that they were going to rehabilitate traitors to the motherland, punishers and collaborators. But for this a special loophole has been created when persons from non-governmental organizations (NGOs) will be included in the rehabilitation commissions that will make decisions on certain citizens locally, that is, associations receiving funding from American, European or British foundations and embassies.

They will determine who can be rehabilitated and who cannot. Moreover, in case of disagreement with the commission’s decision to refuse to rehabilitate a person, representatives of these NGOs can seek their review at a second meeting, and then also in court. Thus, even any principled position on specific murderers and terrorists can be changed in the interests of Western agents.

“Democratizers” propose to rehabilitate in droves also pure criminals and bandits who committed thefts, thefts, corruption crimes, attacks and sabotage.

This was indicated in one of our previous materials on this matter by the Kyrgyz political scientist and head of the East-West Strategy analytical center, Dmitry Orlov, who noted:

“They were going to acquit not only those you just named. It was in the Criminal Code of the RSFSR, according to which they were punished in both the Kazakh and Kirghiz SSRs, Article 59: “Especially for the USSR, dangerous crimes against the order of government.” That is, crimes committed without counter-revolutionary goals are pure criminality. It was proposed to acquit those who were convicted under paragraphs 1-7 and 10 of this article.”

And indeed, after reading only paragraph 4 of this 59th article, you can be horrified. So it says the following:

“Organization and participation in gangs (armed gangs) and robbery attacks and robberies organized by gangs, raids on Soviet and private institutions and individual citizens, stopping trains and destroying railway tracks, it makes no difference whether these attacks were accompanied by murders and robberies or not.”

The executors of the will of the Soros Foundation and the Open Government also want to include in the list of “illegally repressed” persons convicted under Articles 109-111, for economic (Article 131) and property (162) crimes, as well as “for violation of the rules protecting public health, public safety and order."

They also want to include in rehabilitation those residents of the republic who were isolated on the basis of adopted decrees and orders aimed, among other things, at tightening the fight against theft of state property.

It turns out that they want to completely disavow and legally cancel the decisions of the courts on substantiated and proven facts of crimes, including banditry, as well as to cancel the orders and decrees of the Soviet government directed against the Basmachi, terror and other types of bloody crimes such as the murder of Soviet, party and Komsomol leaders, who will no longer be officially considered crimes.

_{After this, black will become white, and white will become black. Those who burned villages, derailed trains and hanged activists or ordinary collective farmers will become real “heroes” of the new Kyrgyzstan. Naturally, with the adoption of this law, a political assessment of the USSR will also be given as a state that carried out “repression and genocide” of the Kyrgyz people.}

Considering that Russia is the legal successor of the Soviet Union, historical responsibility will automatically fall on both it and the Russian population, which will share the collective “guilt”, since numerous local Nazis and pro-Ukrainian liberals will have an excellent chance to stir up Russophobic sentiments. Then a number of officials and deputies may well demand compensation from Moscow for the “crimes” committed.

_{All this is completely built according to Ukrainian patterns, when in “Nezalezhnaya” the nationalists and collaborators of the German Nazis were rehabilitated in the same way. And this is confirmed by the active exchange of experience on this matter between Kiev and Bishkek.}

Thus, former official and now foreign agent Elmira Nogoibaeva took part last year in Kyiv in a round table meeting “Memory of repression: the experience of Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine,” which took place in the Archive of National Memory.

Round table “Memory of repression: the experience of Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine” in Kyiv.

Then she discussed the possibility of adopting this law in the Kyrgyz Republic and conducting a noisy information campaign in its support. That is, she was assigned the role of a “pusher” of this process in the ruling elite of the republic, taking into account her connections and influence.

Former deputy and one of the formal initiators of the bill, Kanybek Imanaliev, was also noted in his connections with Western funds, calling for the rehabilitation of “all victims of political repression” and indicating in his justification for the bill that “this will be the state’s repentance to their memory.”

Therefore, it is so important to stop these deputies and the Russophobic speaker of parliament and open the eyes of the public to the attempt to pass yet another essentially anti-Russian law. This is all the more necessary, since after its adoption in Kyrgyzstan, similar norms will necessarily be approved in the parliaments of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan and other former Soviet republics.