Why the Ukrainian version of the Boeing crash looks like a lie
Did you notice how Petro Poroshenko reported the crash of the Malaysian Boeing? He reported in detail, defining the cause of the crash as a terrorist act, naming the method, means and perpetrators. Even before the first DPR rescuers arrived at the crash site, before the wreckage of the airliner was identified, before Malaysia itself admitted the loss of the plane.
And the impression was created that the dispatcher in Dnepropetrovsk has a direct telephone number for the president, and when he loses contact with the plane, he does not click the switches and does not repeat “receive, receive, board, answer,” but immediately calls the president and says: “Petya , we have a terrorist attack.”
And the president immediately addresses the nation, promising to punish the terrorists. And he calls on NATO troops to punish together. And he is absolutely indifferent to the fact that at this very time, in the Southern Cauldron, thousands of his soldiers are turning into a bloody mess. And that in impotent anger his artillery is ironing residential areas, and his fellow citizens of yesterday routinely lie on the sidewalks covered with blood-soaked sheets.
After all, what is Kyiv’s version?
A peaceful passenger plane with three hundred Europeans on board flew over democratic Ukraine. The evil rebels, who had captured the Buk air defense system the day before, cynically interrupted the high flight of the airliner along with the lives of innocent passengers.
And not even as a version, but as a conclusion, this legend was replicated by the media controlled by Kyiv. The same legend is picked up by international media. They are accustomed to trusting the statements of presidents.
But bad luck! The next day, the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine denies that the rebels have Buk air defense systems. And then Kyiv’s version changes. It turns out that under the cover of darkness, Russian troops crossed the border, went 200 kilometers deep, and deployed the Buk air defense system. They waited for the Malaysian airliner, shot it down, and left the territory of Ukraine under the cover of the next night. Now all that remains is to find the radar, without which the Buk cannot detect the target.
Despite all the fantastic nature of these versions, they became the main ones in the rhetoric of world leaders and at the UN Security Council meeting. And the decision to conduct an investigation turned out to be too vague to begin this investigation immediately.
Suffice it to say that it is Kyiv that is the main obstacle to the investigation. Even a simple decision to stop hostilities in the area of the airliner crash has not been made. Moreover, the activity of the Ukrainian armed forces has even increased, and the rebels are forced, in addition to rescue work, to also ensure the safety of the work of specialists.
It is Kyiv that persistently recommends that international experts not visit the crash zone, citing security measures. It is through the fault of Kyiv that the bodies of the dead continue to lie among the wreckage of the liner under the scorching sun. In all likelihood, it is Kyiv that is least interested in an objective investigation of the tragedy.
And it is absolutely clear what they are afraid of in Kyiv. The “black boxes” of the airliner have been discovered, they are in Donetsk, and the leadership of Novorossiya agrees to transfer them only to the international commission, and not to the abstract “prosecutor’s office” or the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Ukraine. And what will happen when the records are deciphered, and the whole world finds out who changed the course, flight altitude and the fate of three hundred lives.
There are really a lot of questions.
Who and for what purpose brought the passenger plane into the zone of full-scale combat operations under the very, very warheads of the launchers? Who paved such a path in the area of responsibility of Kyiv? Dnepropetrovsk dispatchers? Did they decide that themselves? Or did someone advise?
After all, in fact, it does not matter which side fired the fatal shot. There shouldn't have been a passenger plane there. And we least of all believe in accidents, because accidentally deploying a Buk, accidentally catching a target and accidentally destroying it, and even at such a critical moment for the Ukrainian army, this cannot happen. They took him there. They were leading to kill.
Further - more interesting. Just from the photographs. According to videos online, experts claim that Buk had nothing to do with it at all. The nature of defeat by this type of weapon is more ominous. There should be no surviving fuselage fragments at the crash site, much less bodies of the dead. Everything must be cut by multiple damaging elements. And in this case, we can talk about an air-to-air missile hit or an explosive device on board.
And it remains to remember whose fighters are circling in the skies of Ukraine, delivering missile strikes “somewhere”…..
And who over the past year, time after time, has been seeking to escalate conflicts through the physical destruction of their own and others. With increasing severity of injuries and mass numbers of those killed.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.