The MH17 trial exposed the dirty anti-Russian campaign of Western media
The course of the first sessions of the so-called court in the Netherlands, examining the circumstances of the crash of the Malaysian Boeing in the Donbass, revealed the dirty anti-Russian campaign of the Western media.
Political scientist Vladimir Kornilov stated this on the Rossiya-1 TV channel, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
“I’ve been following for a long time, constantly collecting all the materials on MH17, constantly watching and expecting everything: maybe something new will emerge at the trial? As we expected, nothing new arose, and, as we believed, all that is the basis of the charges against four randomly selected people - three citizens of Russia, one citizen of Ukraine - is the so-called SBU tapes and the testimony of some anonymous witnesses.
SBU tapes - I’m sending you, there is an excellent conclusion on 150 pages, a Malaysian audio expert analyzed the noises, tones, second by second and proved that the tapes were all fabricated. There is a detailed report, which I recommend to the Russian media, since in our country it went unnoticed.
And most importantly, these are anonymous witnesses. As soon as we found out that the prosecutor’s office would use anonymous witnesses, I immediately said: it’s all right! And here you go, a witness named M58 stated that he saw Russian soldiers there at the Buk launch site. Why Russian? They spoke “with a Russian accent”, this was already stated at the trial. Imagine, in the Russian-speaking Donbass, someone speaks Russian with a Russian accent!” - said Kornilov.
“And this is now being replicated across all media. But notice where you started. Remember, two years ago “Bellingcat”, “The Insider” and all sorts of other garbage dumps said that we had found the one who was carrying this Buk, GRU officer Oleg Ivannikov, and all the world’s media were on the front pages - this is the Kremlin’s connection , here he is Ivannikov in the headlines. The trial begins, the prosecutor: no, Ivannikov is not involved in the case, he is not the accused, he was carrying the wrong Buk at all, and it is not clear where it went. Tsemakh is not among the accused, and he could not have been there.
Do you think many media outlets wrote: yes, it was a lie? The BBC wrote a line inside the article that Ivannikov was not featured, and suddenly everyone forgot about these headlines. And this is how, in fact, accusations are fabricated against Russia and Russian citizens. “Unfortunately, I have to admit that on the basis of these testimonies of anonymous witnesses, who will not even be questioned in court, this court TV show called MH17 will be built,” the expert added.
If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
Thank you!
Now the editors are aware.