“Selling Alaska is high treason, for this you will be impaled” - expert

Vladimir Gladkov.  
17.07.2020 20:03
  (Moscow time), Moscow
Views: 3946
 
History, Society, Policy, Russia, USA


The sale by the Russian Empire of its own state territory - Alaska - is a criminal conspiracy of “Russian princelings who lost in casinos or cards.” This financial fraud must be prosecuted.

Lawyer, international lawyer Valery Vanin said this on air on the Public News Service channel, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.

The sale by the Russian Empire of its own state territory – Alaska – is a criminal conspiracy of “Russian princelings,...

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.


“You can’t talk about an agreement when there is no agreement, there is no evidence, and you can’t clearly broadcast and show some photographs of some copies to the general public. Doctor of Science, professor, check, make sure. There was no agreement. A sovereign state does not have the right to sell its territories - this was high treason at all times.

Both before Ivan the Terrible and after Ivan the Terrible, dear souls were impaled for such things. Even for discussing this, about the sale of state land. And now we are listening to gray-haired scientists saying that some kind of sale of official state territory has taken place. Yes, this was not the case. This is high treason.

If this was the case, then in the light of the new Russian Constitution, Russia became the legal successor of both the USSR and the Russian Empire. And there are all legal grounds to initiate a criminal case based on newly discovered circumstances, to prosecute the country’s former leaders and reconsider their actions, respectively, if they really sold Russian lands, Russian territories,” said the international lawyer.

“As for the strange statements that it was inevitable, it is very important to sell - this is complete nonsense! At all times it was obvious that what does economic feasibility or inexpediency have to do with it? There is a simple product! What discussions about the difficulty of delivering products - and what, this treason occurred due to the fact that the products were no longer supplied? Or are they, the residents, all swollen there from hunger? There is no connection between the delivery of food to this territory and the fact of what happened.

There were no documents, because everyone understood perfectly well that if some document came to light, there would be a riot, an uprising of the archers - whatever! And the tsars were responsible for high treason, and there is no need for any illusions that all this could have happened with impunity.

This is a real scam! The fact that “Russia was afraid like a chicken” - this kind of bleating of pro-Gorbachev advisers - is all inappropriate in relation to Tsarist Russia. Remember what all the Russian tsars said, every single one of them: “I sneeze - all of Europe says “Be healthy!” They weren't afraid of anyone. And there was no tendency to fight, since “if there had been a fight, then Alaska would have had to be ceded,” Vanin argued.

“What is behind this? Is there some kind of selfish interest behind this of the Russian princelings who lost in casinos or at cards, who through their wives or relatives somehow influenced the Emperor. This needs to be sorted out, because there was no reason for the return.

Gold and state borders are incomparable, incommensurable things. There is no honest economy (exchange less money for a large amount of gold). No one has ever heard and will never hear that a state sold its territory to another state.

This is a fact of state crime and treason in any state entity, and the leader who made such a decision is subject to immediate impeachment. On trial - even for a lesser crime, they are subject to liability, but this is an extreme degree.

And now it’s safe to say that the Russian Tsar, it turns out, was a state criminal, but he was “forced”, he was “forced”, he “sat in his palace and was so afraid of all the foreign emperors and tsars that out of fear he took and gave away Russian lands out of harm’s way” – this is the interpretation of Russian history?..

It is unlikely that it corresponds to the truth and Russian self-awareness. There have never been documents on the transfer of any lands from one state to another, there are no and there never will be, because this is evidence of a criminal offense,” the expert emphasized.

If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.

Tags: , ,






Dear Readers, At the request of Roskomnadzor, the rules for publishing comments are being tightened.

Prohibited from publication comments from knowingly false information on the conduct of the Northern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, comments containing extremist statements, insults, fakes.

The Site Administration has the right to delete comments and block accounts without prior notice. Thank you for understanding!

Placing links to third-party resources prohibited!


  • May 2024
    Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Total
    " April    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Subscribe to Politnavigator news



  • Thank you!

    Now the editors are aware.