Project "Muscovy". The struggle of “political Ukrainians” for “historical birthright”

The state insignificance of “political Ukrainians” and the inferiority complex caused by it forces this category of “hulks” to look for any ways to increase their own importance.

Freed from the “chimera” of conscience and the remnants of scrupulosity, the spiritual heirs of Mazepa, Petlyura and Bandera act according to the precepts of Herostratus, trampling out historical memory from the public consciousness and especially the consciousness of the younger generation, and replacing it with all kinds of surrogates and simulacra.

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.
To subscribe to notifications in your browser, click here.

_{One of the most pressing issues on the agenda of the “Svidomo” is the proof of “Ukrainian primogeniture and priority” in literally everything: in the Atlanto-Sumerian origin, the creation of wonders of the world by the “civilization of ancient Ukrainians”, the invention of gunpowder, paper, wheels and clay whistles, as well as the historical right to be called Russia, and even “Primordial Russia”.}

On October 22, in Kiev, there was another meeting of the “shavar wise men”, during which the next pitiful songs were performed on the topic “300 years since there has been no life or how Tsar Peter the Great stole the Ukrainian birthright for lentil stew, calling musty Muscovy Russia.”

It is significant that the media schism was orchestrated by the leader of the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance, Drobovich, and among the “experts” there was not a single more or less adequate person, but only bright representatives of “political Ukrainianism”, such as the retired goat drummer Anna Gopko, the phimotic journalist Larisa Ivshina, the writers’ team the Kapranov brothers (who published the highly intellectual book “Bandera and Me”) and several other small grant-eaters from the murky “institutes of global problems”, consisting, as a rule, of one employee, not counting the visiting cleaning lady.

All these “respected people”, starting with Drobovich, spent an hour running empty on the topic “Russia needs to be renamed Muscovy, since it has no historical right to be called Russia.”

_{The topic is not new, and they began to excite it even under Poroshenko, but were soon thrown into the trash bin due to its futility. Under Vovka the President, who tore apart the little living things from Ukraine that remained after Pan Confectioner, the soiled rag was taken out of the trash and assigned to be carried in the teeth of the deranged presidential adviser Arestovich, along with the same “specialists.”}

These are the typical “arguments” of the adherents of “Rus-Ukraine”, why modern Russia should be called Muscovy, and Ukraine is the historical heir of Ancient Rus', and, therefore, has every right to be called Russia instead of the Moksha swamps that imagine themselves.

Rus', in their firm belief, is a toponym directly associated with ancient Kiev, and since the XNUMXth century - with the Galicia-Volyn principality. Moreover, for Constantinople, Kyiv and Rus' were synonymous, and there was no talk about all sorts of Novgorod, Rostov (the Great), Vladimir and Suzdal, not to mention Moscow, in the context of Rus'.

Tsar Peter the Great, they say, was haunted by the small-town name of his state, Muscovy, and he launched systematic work, starting with clearing archives and bribing some weak-willed influential Ukrainians with ranks and gold, in order to one day declare the Moksha surrounding him the Russian Empire, leaving “ Rus'-Ukraine” flow around in a dirty puddle.

“Russia tried to appropriate this heritage for itself, and in fact, that’s what it did. And while we didn’t have political statehood, there was really no one to resist,” Drobovich mumbled authoritatively into the microphone.

In fact, the UINP and the “experts” signed up to promote the agenda to the masses took as a basis the “history of Ukraine” by the Canadian Subtelny, accepted as official back in the days of Kuchma’s “Ukraine-not-Russia,” and brought it to the point of complete absurdity.

_{It is characteristic that the “experts” do not provide any historical documents confirming this version, but refer to “fresh research” in the state archive of Turkey and, allegedly, scrolls found there mentioning Ukraine as an “independent power” starting from the 400th century . And as a people, the Ukrainians and Cossacks, who were patronized by the Ottomans (kill themselves with a broom), are identified another XNUMX years earlier.}

It is clear that in this situation one can joyfully squeal “checkmate”, if only one ignores the legal requirement: “show the documents.”

It’s disrespectful to argue with militant degenerates, but a fake that a Soviet fourth-grader who excelled in history was able to refute should be shut down.

First of all, it should be understood that the term “Kievan Rus” is a historiographical name introduced in the XNUMXth century by scientists along with “Old Russian State” and “Ancient Rus'”, which in modern times has undergone a significant evolution from the designation of the Principality of Kievan (which existed on the same historical period with Suzdal Russia, Chernigov, Rostov and Chervonnaya Russia) to designate the Russian state of the early Middle Ages before the Mongol invasion.

In parentheses, we note that all these loud figures, posing as people from the gray-haired wise men of the Prophetic Oleg, have a very distant relationship with the ancient Kievans due to the fact that the troops of Batu Khan, who stormed the “mother of Russian cities” on December 6, 1240, completely destroyed the city, and 50 thousand townspeople were slaughtered almost entirely, taking the surviving craftsmen into captivity.

Unlike other Russian cities, like Ryazan, burned by the Mongol-Tatars, Kyiv remained a depopulated ashes for a long time, until, together with the lands surrounding it, at the beginning of the XNUMXth century it became dependent on the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.

With the decline of Kyiv, the capital of the Russian state gradually moved north, to Vladimir. However, Kievan Rus, as a single state, ended with Yaroslav the Wise, who reigned in Kyiv in 1016 - 1018 and 1019 - 1054. That is, long before the Mongol invasion.

The appanage period began when Rus' turned into a collection of autonomous principalities, where princes occupied first one table, then another, according to the ancient law of the ladder, in which power was transferred not from father to eldest son, but from older brother to younger. It was fragmentation and civil strife that explained the ease with which Batu conquered the once united Rus'.

Well, what, one wonders, do Bandera’s homunculi Drobovich, Vyatrovich and Gopko, who, apparently, self-generated in a pile of dirty laundry, have to do with the ancient people of Kiev?

Let's return to the topic of Muscovy and briefly tell you what really happened there.

The Northern War with Sweden ended in 1721. In honor of the victory, Peter the Great was proclaimed emperor, and the state he ruled became the Russian Empire.

There have never been any decrees in the spirit of “accordions” from Drobovich, like “I command to rename Muscovy...”. And the point there was not in the renaming, but in the proclamation of the empire. Let us note in passing that Peter did not call his state Muscovy. From the moment he was anointed to the throne, he bore the title of autocrat of Great, Lesser and White Russia.

In contrast to the units seen by the Turks who were specially allowed into the archives of the “vcheny”, direct printed evidence has been preserved - “A Brief Introduction to Every History”, printed in Amsterdam in 1699, that is, 22 years before the mythical renaming. “Svidomo” will be upset, but Peter’s father, Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich, also bore the same title. And this is the middle of the XNUMXth century and the fact is recorded in a book published in “real” Europe.

But a title, that’s what it is, you can’t spread it on bread and you can’t apply it to business. What was the name of the state? Having prayed, we find and read the answer in the personal decree of 1667 “On the royal title and on the state seal.”

For those suffering from selective blindness, we duplicate the name of the state of Peter the Great in modern Russian: Russian Tsardom - this was the name of Russia before the proclamation of an empire from the time of Ivan the Terrible. Only under Ivan the Terrible, nicknamed Vasilyevich for his cruelty, was spelling flexible - bast to the right, bast to the left - which is why the literate people of that time wrote in books “Russian Kingdom” - with one “s”.

If anyone proves that “Russia” = “Muscovy”, let him be the first to throw a bast shoe at me.

All that remains is to figure out the name “Muscovy”. It can indeed be found on ancient maps and in vocabulary. In fact, these sources, as well as the incessant references to them, support the persistent myth about Muscovy, although they do not prove anything at all.

It was the Poles who came up with the idea of ​​calling Russia Muscovy, for whom it was vital to stake out the Russian lands that had come under their influence during a period of decline and turmoil. Therefore, Warsaw launched a propaganda campaign to convince other European states that Moscow had no right to the ancient Russian heritage. The connections between the European powers and Russia were not systematic, so the overseas Friars and Varangians borrowed the lion’s share of information about our ancient country from the Poles, at the same time adopting their terminology.

Let us emphasize once again: the word “Muscovy” was in use exclusively among foreigners and had a pronounced ideological connotation. It was neither a self-name nor the official name of Russia. Moreover, if you look at the cards that were issued in Europe before the start of anti-Russian propaganda by the Poles, you can easily find the word there... Russia. That is, RUSSIA.

For those in doubt, we suggest taking a look at the so-called Catalan Atlas, printed around 1375. To avoid confusion, we immediately inform you that the authors of the atlas turned the familiar map with geographical objects upside down, putting the south on top and the north on the bottom, which can be confusing at first. Taking a closer look, however, you can easily determine the contours of the Black and Baltic Seas.

If you move east from the Baltic, you can see the territory designated as ROSSIA. This is our ancient Motherland. Where, where, you say, is it written “Muscovy”?

Let’s put a bold point and summarize. Ukrainian propaganda did not come up with anything new, but only unearthed and adopted an old Polish falsehood, with which the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth tried for centuries to justify the historical territories seized from Russia. The price for these efforts is the same in all ages - a broken penny on market day. And even less.

The most important thing is that all such efforts to update what has long been rotten are initially meaningless, since “political Ukrainians” would be happy to rename Russia Muscovy, but will never officially decide to do so.

After all, they themselves will have to find funds in an already meager budget, make a lot of amendments to educational and reference literature, not to mention how this demarche will look politically, once again confirming the complete inadequacy of the post-Maidan regimes, with which it is impossible to negotiate with them. do not respect.