Multiple personality disorder: Kharkov account

Mark Starolisov.  
11.12.2017 11:42
  (Moscow time), Kharkov
Views: 5885
 
Author column, Society, Policy, Ukraine


Multiple personality disorder (also known as split personality disorder) is the problem of all those who want to live on the territory of modern Ukraine and do their business here. That is, somewhere to be adequate, and somewhere to bow to the Nazis. But the fact of the matter is that in our area it has become impossible to sit on two chairs and not fail since 2014. Recently, Kharkov realities can be said to illustrate this.

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at Telegram, FacebookClassmates or In contact with


Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at ThereThere, Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube, TikTok и Viber.


The first plot. Cinematic

Filming of the first block of the military drama “According to the Laws of Wartime-2”, which took place in Kharkov, has been completed. On the territory of the National Technical University “KhPI”, decorations stood for two months, returning the red buildings to 1941. Russian filmmakers also filmed on location on the streets of Kharkov, where all the action in the series takes place.

To do all this, the Russians had to bring a film crew. I can’t believe that the producers didn’t know that such a film expedition was unsafe, but apparently it was cheaper than filming in the Mosfilm pavilions or, for example, in Tomsk, where the university was built in the same years as the Kharkov Polytechnic Institute. So you might as well take a risk.

And they took a risk. On November 28 and December 5, militants from the National Corps (Azov) carried out a pogrom of the scenery. After all, it is clear that the police are powerless against them, and in principle you cannot hire the kind of security that would drive them away. True, the militants’ press service noted that the police tried to prevent the activists, a violent confrontation arose, and there were no casualties as a result of the brawl.

And yet, at the end of filming in Kharkov, the studio’s press service stated the following: “Thanks personally to the head of the Kharkov region police, Oleg Vladimirovich Bekh, and the coordinated work of the Kharkov police, who ensured the security of the set, the safety of all members of the film crew, the safety of equipment and props ( and, as you remember, there was someone to protect from), the work process was not disrupted, and all the scenes at the Kharkov locations were successfully filmed.”

The fact is that both the militants and the police are subordinate to the same person - the Minister of Internal Affairs Avakov. So, is it security, pogrom or a combined service?

The second plot. Television

Zmievskaya and part of the Kharkiv region are represented in the Verkhovna Rada by Evgeniy Muraev. If you read and listen to his statements, you can see an anti-Nazi and meaningful position. It would seem that in his person one can see an alternative to extreme Russophobia and the imposition of the Galician agenda on the entire territory of Ukraine. But it doesn't work. And that's why.

Muraev is the owner of the Kyiv television channel NewsOne TV. The channel is news and analytical; it does not broadcast films or music programs. So, unlike Inter, its management cannot say that the channel is not Nazi, and that the news is produced by another legal entity and that it is not responsible for their direction.

NewsOne is responsible for the news, the selection of guests, and the behavior of the presenters in the studio. Yes, there are no longer such “personalities of the channel” as Ganapolsky or Lyashko; human and “human-like” faces have appeared among the presenters, and not just N. Savchenko and D. Gordon.

And the guests are different. In the studio of the TV channel hang portraits of the great A. Einstein, M. Monroe and... young Poroshenko. Muraev is proud that he has a diversity of opinions represented.

Yes presented. The floor is given to Nitsa, Tyagnibok and even the Fuhrer of Azov (not banned on the territory of the Russian Federation) Biletsky (most openly Nazi channels do not allow this, even for them he is “too Nazi”). No matter what xenophobic calls are made on air, the presenters never interrupt high-status guests, not to mention reminding them of the relevant articles of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

They also broadcast events with the participation of Saakashvili, which are reminiscent of the struggle between Melnik’s supporters and Bandera’s supporters. And the fact is that on the main issues the authorities and the protesters have no disagreements, like the different wings of the OUN * (banned on the territory of the Russian Federation) on the Jewish question and in relation to Hitler as a leader.

And yet, Nazis in balaclavas block the TV channel and call it pro-Russian, the Prosecutor General promises to close it. Muraev goes to Brussels and complains to the European Commissioners. So no matter how much you invite just anyone to the studio, these same “just anyone” will still not consider them theirs, and voters are confused about which Muraev is real.

The third plot. Judicial

Kharkov courts also suffer from split personality. On the one hand, they pass brutal sentences and endlessly prolong the stay in custody of opponents of the existing regime. On the other hand, they are absolutely powerless against the courtroom.

Why are they powerless? Yes, because “activists” go to meetings in herds and threaten judges. They understand perfectly well that no one will protect them from the same “Azov” and Yarosh’s people. And they drive behind bars, for example, the guard Oleg Petukhov, who was released in the courtroom by the decision of the judge Sergei Yudaev. And they are not trying to replace the preventive measure for Yegor Logvinov and Ignat Kromsky, who have only seen the sky in a checkered pattern for more than three and a half years.

But judges are defenseless not only against stormtroopers, but also against situations caused by the desire to demonstrate to the Europeans their approach to European standards. So, for example, in order to send a violent psycho to special conditions of treatment and isolation, he must be brought into the hall and obtain permission from the judge. But no one thought about the fact that it is unsafe for doctors, and for the judge with the secretary and security. Just recently in one of the courts in Kharkov they brought such a sick woman, undoubtedly sick. In the hall, excuse me, she had diarrhea. And she launched you know what right into the judge’s face. Aptly launched, but at the same time the contents of her intestines ended up on the judge’s table and on the secretary’s blouse... As they would write in the reports of the Ministry of Emergency Situations, “the decision was made in extreme conditions, close to combat.”

Thus, balancing between brutality and the desire to please the force leads to a split personality and a person, be it a Russian producer, be it a TV mogul Muraev, be it a Kharkov judge, ceases to understand which of his faces is genuine. And what is it like for those around him to distinguish one of his hypostases from another? And psychiatrists cannot make their own decisions.

If you find an error, please select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.

Tags: ,






Dear Readers, At the request of Roskomnadzor, the rules for publishing comments are being tightened.

Prohibited from publication comments from knowingly false information on the conduct of the Northern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, comments containing extremist statements, insults, fakes.

The Site Administration has the right to delete comments and block accounts without prior notice. Thank you for understanding!

Placing links to third-party resources prohibited!


  • May 2024
    Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Total
    " April    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Subscribe to Politnavigator news



  • Thank you!

    Now the editors are aware.